Polity, Politics and Policy Evaluation in Belgium

Evaluation

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 253-273

  Varone, Frédéric ^a   Jacob, Steve ^b   de Winter, Lieven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Belgium; federalism; institutionalization; parliamentary control; partitocracy

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744560896     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389005058475     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Braun, D., ed. (2000) Public Policy and Federalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.
2. Derlien, H.-U. and R. C. Rist (2002) ‘Conclusion. Policy Evaluation in International Comparison’, in J.-E. Furubo, R. C. Rist and R. Sandahl (eds) International Atlas of Evaluation, pp. 439-455. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers.
3. Dewachter, W. (1981) ‘De partijenstaat in de Westeuropese polyarchie: Een proeve tot meting’, Res Publica: Belgian Journal of Political Science 23(1): 115-123.
4. De Winter, L. (1996) ‘Party Encroachment on the Executive and Legislative Branch in the Belgian Polity’, Res Publica: Belgian Journal of Political Science 38(2): 325-352.
5. De Winter, L. and P. Dumont (2003) ‘Belgium: Delegation and Accountability under Partitocratic Rule’, in K. Strøm, W. C. Müller and T. Bergman (eds) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, pp. 253-280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. De Winter, L., D. Della Porta and C. Deschouwer (1996) ‘Comparing Similar Countries: Belgium and Italy’, Res Publica: Belgian Journal of Political Science 38(2): 215-236.
7. Feinstein, O. (2002) ‘Use of Evaluations and the Evaluation of their Use’, Evaluation 8(4): 433-439.
8. Fontaine, C. and E. Monnier (2002) ‘Evaluation in France’, in J.-E. Furubo, R. C. Rist and R. Sandahl (eds) International Atlas of Evaluation, pp. 63-75. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers.
9. Furubo, J.-E. and R. Sandahl (2002) ‘Introduction. A Diffusion Perspective on Global Developments in Evaluation’, in J.-E. Furubo, R. C. Rist and R. Sandahl (eds) International Atlas of Evaluation, pp. 1-23. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers.
10. Furubo, J.-E., R. C. Rist and R. Sandahl, eds (2002) International Atlas of Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers.
11. Haas, P. (1992) ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization 46(1): 1-35.
12. Hall, P. A. and R. Taylor (1996) ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44(5): 936-957.
13. Jacob, S. and F. Varone (2003) Évaluer l'action publique: État des lieux et perspectives en Belgique. Gand: Academia Press.
14. Jacob, S. and F. Varone (2004) ‘Evaluation Practice around the World. Belgium. Policy Evaluation in Belgium: Toward Institutionalization?’, in S. Mathison (ed.) Encyclopedia of Evaluation, pp. 174-175. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15. Janett, D. (2003) ‘Evaluation wird als Kontrollinstrument des Bundesparlaments immer wichtiger’, Leges: Législation et évaluation (14)1: 165-7.
16. Koelble, T. A. (1995) ‘The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology’, Comparative Politics 27(2): 231-243.
17. Leeuw, F. and P. Rozendal (1994) ‘Policy Evaluation and the Netherlands’ Government: Scope, Utilization and Organizational Learning’, in F. Leeuw, R. C. Rist and R. Sonnichsen (eds) Can Governments Learn? Comparative Perspectives on Evaluation and Organizational Learning, pp. 69-70. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
18. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Lowndes, V. (1996) ‘Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal’, Public Administration 74(2): 181-197.
20. MacDonald, B., P. Rogers and B. Kefford (2003) ‘Teaching People to Fish? Building the Evaluation Capability of Public Sector Organizations’, Evaluation 9(1): 9-29.
21. Newman, D. and R. Brown (1992) ‘Violations of Evaluation Standards: Frequency and Seriousness of Occurrence’, Evaluation Review 16(3): 219-234.
22. OECD (1997) Promouvoir l'utilisation de l'évaluation de programme. Paris: OECD.
23. Perret, B. (1998) ‘Institutionalise and Professionalise Evaluation: The French Case’, unpublished manuscript.
24. Rist, R. C., ed. (1998) Program Evaluation and The Management of Government: Patterns and Prospects across Eight Nations. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers.
25. Rouban, L. (1993) ‘Évaluation et modernisation administrative’, in CURAPP (ed.) L'évaluation dans l'administration, pp. 34-54. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
26. Stame, N. (2003) ‘Evaluation in Italy: An Inverted Sequence from Performance Management to Program Evaluation?’, in J.-E. Furubo, R. C. Rist and R. Sandahl (eds) International Atlas of Evaluation, pp. 273-289. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers.
27. Strøm, K. (2000) ‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 261-289.
28. Varone, F. and S. Jacob (2004) ‘Institutionnalisation de l'évaluation et Nouvelle Gestion Publique: Un état des lieux comparatif’, Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée 11(2): 271-92.
29. Wargo, M. (1995) ‘The Impact of Federal Government Reinvention on Federal Evaluation Activity’, Evaluation Practice 16(3): 227-237.
30. Watts, R. L. (1999) Comparing Federal Systems. Kingstone: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.