Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis

European Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 2219-2229

  Leiner, T ^a,b   de Haan, M W ^a   Nelemans, P J ^a   Engelshoven, J M ^a,b   Vasbinder, G B C ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computed tomography, angiography; Hypertension,renal; Kidney, ultrasound; Magnetic resonance, vascular studies; Renal arteries

Indexed keywords

COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPARATIVE ANATOMY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FIBROMUSCULAR DYSPLASIA; FLUOROSCOPY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY ANGIOGRAPHY; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEPHROSCLEROSIS; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RADIOSENSITIVITY; RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 27744553413     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2826-6     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Laragh J. 1978 Harry Goldblatt 1891-1977 Trans. Assoc. Am. Physicians 91 24-27 1:STN:280:CSaB2M%2FmtVM%3D
2. Hillman B.J. 1989 Imaging advances in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension Am. J. Roentgenol. 153 5-14 1:STN:280:BiaB1crhsFM%3D
3. Derkx FH, Schalekamp MA (1994) Renal artery stenosis and hypertension. Lancet 344:237-239 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)93002-3
4. Eardley KS, Lipkin GW (1999) Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: Is it worth diagnosing? J Hum Hypertens 13:217-220 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000785
5. Safian RD, Textor SC (2001) Renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 344:431-442 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ksVajuw%3D%3D
6. Working Group on Renovascular Hypertension (1987) Detection, evaluation, and treatment of renovascular hypertension. Final report. Arch Intern Med 147:820-829
7. Slovut DP, Olin JW (2004) Fibromuscular dysplasia. N Engl J Med 350:1862-1871 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjsVOgsLw%3D
8. Schreij G, de Haan MW, Oei TK, Koster D, de Leeuw PW (1999) Interpretation of renal angiography by radiologists. J Hypertens 17:1737-1741 10.1097/00004872-199917120-00011
9. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM (2001) Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 135:401-411 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrislSgsw%3D%3D
10. JA Kaufman 2004 Renal arteries. In: JA Kaufman MJ Lee (eds) Vascular and interventional radiology. The requisites Mosby Philadelphia pp. 323-349
11. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG et al (2003) Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 141:674-682
12. Bude RO, Forauer AR, Caoili EM, Nghiem HV (1998) Is it necessary to study accessory arteries when screening the renal arteries for renovascular hypertension? Radiology 226:411-416
13. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA (1998) Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1228-1235 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmtlCkuw%3D%3D
14. Schoenberg SO, Prince MR, Knopp MV, Allenberg JR (2001) Renal MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6:351-370
15. Cochran ST, Bomyea K, Sayre JW (2002) Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. Am J Roentgenol 176:1385-1388
16. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ et al (1996) Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:685-696 10.1002/jmri.10214
17. Maki JH, Chenevert TL, Prince MR (2000) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 8:322-344
18. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A et al (1998) Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:671-677 10.1002/ 1522-2586(200011)12:5<671::AID-JMRI3>3.0.CO;2-F
19. Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ et al (2000) Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: Accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 207:497-504
20. Shetty AN, Bis KG, Kirsch M, Weintraub J, Laub G (2001) Contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of renal arteries: Optimization of technique and pitfalls. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:912-923 10.1002/ 1522-2586(200012)12:6<912::AID-JMRI15>3.0.CO;2-A
21. Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, Kruger DG, Riederer SJ (2003) High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 218:481-490
22. Prokop M (1999) General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol 45(Suppl 1):S4-S10 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00358-3
23. Prokop M (2003) Protocols and future directions in imaging of renal artery stenosis: CT angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23(Suppl 1):S101-S110
24. Fleischmann D (2003) MDCT of renal and mesenteric vessels. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 5):M94-M101 14989617
25. Kemerink GJ, De Haan MW, Vasbinder GB et al (2002) The effect of equipment set up on patient radiation dose in conventional and CT angiography of the renal arteries. Br J Radiol 76:625-630
26. Lufft V, Hoogestraat-Lufft L, Fels LM et al (2004) Contrast media nephropathy: Intravenous CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in renal artery stenosis: A prospective randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis 40:236-242
27. Garcia-Ruiz C, Martinez-Vea A, Sempere T et al (2004) Low risk of contrast nephropathy in high-risk patients undergoing spiral computed tomography angiography with the contrast medium iopromide and prophylactic oral hydratation. Clin Nephrol 61:170-176 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ot1ahuw%3D%3D
28. Petersein J, Peters CR, Wolf M, Hamm B (2003) Results of the safety and efficacy of iobitridol in more than 61:000 patients. Eur Radiol 13:2006-2011 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svgtlSquw%3D%3D
29. Beregi JP, Louvegny S, Gautier C et al (1999) Fibromuscular dysplasia of the renal arteries: Comparison of helical CT angiography and arteriography. Am J Roentgenol 172:27-34 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7gtlyjug%3D%3D
30. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH et al (2005) High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology (in press)
31. Assen HC van, Vasbinder GB, Stoel BC, Putter H, van Engelshoven JM, Reiber JH (2004) Quantitative assessment of the morphology of renal arteries from X-ray images: Quantitative vascular analysis. Invest Radiol 39:365-373 15167103
32. de Koning PJ, Schaap JA, Janssen JP, Westenberg JJ, van der Geest RJ, Reiber JH (2003) Automated segmentation and analysis of vascular structures in magnetic resonance angiographic images. Magn Reson Med 50:1189-1198 14648566
33. Rabbia C, Valpreda S (2003) Duplex scan sonography of renal artery stenosis. Int Angiol 22:101-115 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szjtlSrsw%3D%3D
34. Radermacher J, Chavan A, Schaffer J et al (2000) Detection of significant renal artery stenosis with color Doppler sonography: combining extrarenal and intrarenal approaches to minimize technical failure. Clin Nephrol 53:333-343 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvgvFWmtw%3D%3D
35. De Cobelli F, Venturini M, Vanzulli A et al (2000) Renal arterial stenosis: Prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 214:373-380 10671583
36. Kliewer MA, Tupler RH, Carroll BA et al (1993) Renal artery stenosis: analysis of Doppler waveform parameters and tardus-parvus pattern. Radiology 189:779-787 1:STN:280:ByuD2M3mtVw%3D
37. Baumgartner I, Behrendt P, Rohner P, Baumgartner RW (1999) A validation study on the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of renal artery duplex ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 25:225-231 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3lt1Smuw%3D%3D
38. Johansson M Jensen G, Aurell M et. al (2000) Evaluation of duplex ultrasound and captopril renography for detection of renovascular hypertension. Kidney Int 58:774-782 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitFKltw%3D%3D
39. de Haan MW, Kroon AA, Flobbe K et al (2002) Renovascular disease in patients with hypertension: Detection with duplex ultrasound. J Hum Hypertens 16:501-507 12080435
40. Robbin ML, Lockhart ME, Barr RG (2003) Renal imaging with ultrasound contrast: Current status. Radiol Clin North Am 41:963-978 14521204
41. Grenier N, Basseau F, Ries M, Tyndal B, Jones R, Moonen C (2003) Functional MRI of the kidney. Abdom Imaging 28:164-175 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7jsFehtQ%3D%3D
42. Zhang HL, Schoenberg SO, Resnick LM, Prince MR (2003) Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: Combining gadolinimum-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with functional magnetic resonance pulse sequences. Am J Hypertens 16:1079-1082 14643586
43. Yim PJ, Cebral JR, Weaver A et al (2004) Estimation of the differential pressure at renal artery stenoses. Magn Reson Med 51:969-977 15122679
44. Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, Londy FJ, Wakefield TW, Stanley JC (1997) Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 205:128-136 1:STN:280:ByiH28%2FlvFY%3D
45. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Bock M et al (1997) Renal artery stenosis: grading of hemodynamic changes with cine phase-contrast MR blood flow measurements. Radiology 203:45-53 1:STN:280:ByiB3s3jvFw%3D
46. Schoenberg SO Knopp MV Londy F et al. 2002 Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: A multireader tricenter study J Am Soc Nephrol 13 158-169 11752033
47. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Johnson G, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC (2001) MR renography with low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: Feasibility. Radiology 221:371-379 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnkvVCjsA%3D%3D
48. de Priester JA, den Boer JA, Christiaans MH et al (2003) Automated quantitative evaluation of diseased and nondiseased renal transplants with MR renography. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:95-103 12500278
49. Binkert CA, Debatin JF, Schneider E et al (2001) Can MR measurement of renal artery flow and renal volume predict the outcome of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:233-239 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Flt1CgtA%3D%3D
50. Mounier-Vehier C, Haulon S, Devos P et al (2002) Renal atrophy outcome after revascularization in fibromuscular dysplasia disease. J Endovasc Ther 9:605-613 12431144
51. Mounier-Vehier C Lions C Devos P et al (2002) Cortical thickness: An early morphological marker of atherosclerotic renal disease. Kidney Int 61:591-598 11849401
52. Mounier-Vehier C, Lions C, Jaboureck O et al (2002) Parenchymal consequences of fibromuscular dysplasia renal artery stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis 40:1138-1145 12460031
53. Mounier-Vehier C, Haulon S, Lions C et al (2002) Renal atrophy in atherosclerotic renovascular disease: Gradual changes 6 months after successful angioplasty. J Endovasc Ther 9:863-872 12546589
54. Lerman LO, Taler SJ, Textor SC, Sheedy PF II, Stanson AW, Romero JC (1996) Computed tomography-derived intrarenal blood flow in renovascular and essential hypertension. Kidney Int 49:846-854 1:STN:280:BymB3s7islY%3D
55. Lerman LO, Flickinger AL, Sheedy PF II, Turner ST (1996) Reproducibility of human kidney perfusion and volume determinations with electron beam computed tomography. Invest Radiol 31:204-210 1:STN:280:BymB1M%2FgvVM%3D
56. Paul JF, Ugolini P, Sapoval M, Mousseaux E, Gaux JC (2001) Unilateral renal artery stenosis: Perfusion patterns with electron-beam dynamic CT-preliminary experience. Radiology 221:261-265 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrit1Grug%3D%3D
57. Bucek RA, Puchner S, Reiter M, Dirisamer A, Minar E, Lammer J (2004) Multidetector CT angiography with perfusion analysis in the surveillance of renal artery stents. J Endovasc Ther 11:139-143 15056025
58. Schwerk WB, Restrepo IK, Prinz H (1993) Semiquantitative analysis of intrarenal arterial Doppler flow spectra in healthy adults. Ultraschall Med 14:117-122 1:STN:280:ByyA38vosl0%3D
59. Radermacher J, Chavan A, Bleck J et al (2001) Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 344:410-417 10.1056/NEJM200102083440603
60. Radermacher J, Mengel M, Ellis S et al (2003) The renal arterial resistance index and renal allograft survival. N Engl J Med 349:115-124 12853584
61. Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, De Leeuw P, De Haan M, van Engelshoven J (1998) The cost-effectiveness of the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur J Radiol 27:95-107 10.1016/S0720-048X(97)00158-7
62. Rieumont MJ, Kaufman JA, Geller SC et al (1997) Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Am J Roentgenol 169:39-44 1:STN:280:ByiA2M7itFI%3D
63. Leung DA, Pelkonen P, Hany TF, Zimmermann G, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF (1998) Value of image subtraction in 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:598-602 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ovVGlsQ%3D%3D
64. Thornton J, O'Callaghan J, Walshe J, O'Brien E, Varghese JC, Lee MJ (1999) Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 9:930-934 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3pvFGmsA%3D%3D
65. Bongers V, Bakker J, Beutler JJ, Beek FJ, De Klerk JM (2000) Assessment of renal artery stenosis: Comparison of captopril renography and gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Clin Radiol 55:346-353 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3nvVSjtg%3D%3D
66. Korst MB, Joosten FB, Postma CT, Jager GJ, Krabbe JK, Barentsz JO (2000) Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries. Am J Roentgenol 174:629-634 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7mtlGgtw%3D%3D
67. Voiculescu A, Hofer M, Hetzel GR et al (2001) Noninvasive investigation for renal artery stenosis: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and color Doppler sonography as compared to digital subtraction angiography. Clin Exp Hypertens 23:521-531 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnmsFarsQ%3D%3D
68. Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schaefer C, Jandeleit K, Olbricht C (1994) Accuracy of CT angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. RoFo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 161:519-525 1:STN:280:ByqC3c3gsVc%3D
69. Olbricht CJ, Paul K, Prokop M et al (1995) Minimally invasive diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by spiral computed tomography angiography. Kidney Int 48:1332-1337 1:STN:280:BymD1Mbns1w%3D
70. Kaatee R, Beek FJ, de Lange EE et al (1997) Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 205:121-127 1:STN:280:ByiH28%2FlvFU%3D
71. Equine O, Beregi JP, Mounier-Vehier C, Gautier C, Desmoucelles F, Carre A (1999) Importance of the echo-Doppler and helical angioscanner of the renal arteries in the management of renovascular diseases. Results of a retrospective study in 113 patients. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 92:1043-1045 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvhs1WitA%3D%3D
72. Wittenberg G, Kenn W, Tschammler A, Sandstede J, Hahn D (1999) Spiral CT angiography of renal arteries: Comparison with angiography. Eur Radiol 9:546-551 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7oslertg%3D%3D