Estimation of the Differential Pressure at Renal Artery Stenoses

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 969-977

  Yim, Peter J ^a   Cebral, Juan R ^b   Weaver, Ashley ^c   Lutz, Robert J ^c   Soto, Orlando ^b   Vasbinder, G Boudewijn C ^d   Ho, Vincent B ^e   Choyke, Peter L ^c  

^a ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Magnetic resonance angiography; Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging; Renal artery disease

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; LIQUID METAL COOLED REACTORS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

DEFORMABLE MODELING; DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENTS OF; PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL; RENAL ARTERIES; RENAL ARTERY STENOSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOW RATE; FLUID TRANSPORT; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRESSURE GRADIENT; RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION;

EID: 2342522709     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20078     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Derlex FH, Schalekamp MA. Renal artery stenosis and hypertension. Lancet 1994;344;237-240.
2. Itoh K. 99mTc-MAG3: review of pharmacokinetics, clinical application to renal diseases and quantification of renal function. Ann Nucl Med 2001;15:179-190.
3. Dagli MS, Caride VJ, Carpenter S, Zubal IG. Compartmental analysis of the complete dynamic scan data for scintigraphic determination of effective renal plasma flow. J Nucl Med 1997;38:1285-1290.
4. Taylor A. Renovascular hypertension: nuclear medicine techniques. Q J Nucl Med 2002;46:268.
5. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:401-411.
6. de Haan MW, Kouwenhoven M, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM. Renal artery blood flow: quantification with breath-hold or respiratory triggered phase-contrast MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1133-1137.
7. Binkert CA, Debatin JF, Schneider E, Hodler J, Ruehm SG, Schmidt M, Hoffmann U. Can MR measurement of renal artery flow and renal volume predict the outcome of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001;24:233-239.
8. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Kallinowski F, Just A. Correlation of hemodynamic impact and morphologic degree of renal artery stenosis in a canine model. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:2190-2198.
9. Westenberg JJ, Wasser MN, van der Geest RJ, Pattynama PM, de Roos A, Vanderschoot J, Reiber JH. Variations in blood flow waveforms in stenotic renal arteries by 2D phase-contrast cine MRI. J Magn Reson Imag 1998;8:590-597.
10. Radermacher J, Chavan A, Bleck J, Vitzthum A, Stoess B, Gebel MJ, Galanski M, Koch KM, Haller H. Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:410-417.
11. Jaff MR (ed.). Endovascular therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: present and future. Armonk, NY: Futura; 2001.
12. Gross CM, Kramer J, Weingartner O, Uhlich F, Luft FC, Waigand J, Dietz R. Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter. Radiology 2001;220:751-756.
13. van Jaarsveld BC, Pieterman H, van Dijk LC, van Seijen AJ, Krijnen P, Derkx FH, Man in't Veld AJ, Schalekamp MA. Inter-observer variability in the angiographic assessment of renal artery stenosis. DRASTIC study group. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative. J Hypertens 1999;17:1731-1736.
14. Gross CM, Kramer J, Weingartner O, Uhlich F, Luft FC, Waigand J, Dietz R. Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter. Radiology 2001;220:751-756.
15. Nahman NS Jr, Maniam P, Hernandez RA Jr, Falkenhain M, Hebert LA, Kantor BS, Stockum AE, VanAman ME, Spigos DG. Renal artery pressure gradients in patients with angiographic evidence of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis 1994;24:695-699.
16. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:401-411.
17. Leung DA, Hagspiel KD, Angle JF, Spinosa DJ, Matsumoto AH, Butty S. MR angiography of the renal arteries. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40: 847-865.
18. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, Leiner T, Wilson GJ, Kessels AG, Lemarie EE, Kaandorp DW, Ho KY, Van Engelshoven JM. Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imag 2002;16:685-696.
19. Westenberg JJ, Wasser MN, van der Geest RJ, Pattynama PM, de Roos A, Vanderschoot J, Reiber JH. Variations in blood flow waveforms in stenotic renal arteries by 2D phase-contrast cine MRI. J Magn Reson Imag 1998;8:590-597.
20. Schoenberg SO, Just A, Bock M, Knopp MV, Persson PB, Kirchheim HR. Noninvasive analysis of renal artery blood flow dynamics with MR cine phase-contrast flow measurements. Am J Physiol 1997;272: H2477-484.
21. de Haan MW, Kouwenhoven M, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM. Renal artery blood flow: quantification with breath-hold or respiratory triggered phase-contrast MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1133-1137.
22. Cebral JR, Yim PJ, Lohner R, Soto O, Choyke PL. Blood flow modeling in carotid arteries with computational fluid dynamics and MR imaging. Acad Radiol 2002;9:1286-1299.
23. Soto O, Löhner R, Cebral JR, Codina R. A time-accurate implicit monolithic finite element scheme for incompressible flow problems. Proc ECCOMAS CFD, Swansea, UK; 2001.
24. Yim PJ, Vasbinder GBC, Ho VB, Choyke PL. Isosurfaces as deformable models for magnetic resonance angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2003;22:875-881.
25. Taubin G. A signal processing approach to fair surface design. Computer Graphics Proceedings; 1995. p 351-358.
26. Cebral JR, Lohner R. From medical images to CFD meshes. Proc 8th International Meshing Roundtable, South Lake Tahoe, California, 1999.
27. Lohner R. Regridding surface triangulations. J Comp Phys 1996;126:1-10.
28. Lohner R. Automatic unstructured grid generators. Finite Elements Analysis Design 1997;25:111-134.
29. Womersley JR. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow, and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J Physiol 1955;127:553-563.
30. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, Leiner T, Wilson GJ, Kessels AG, Lemarie EE, Kaandorp DW, Ho KY, van Engelshoven JM. Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breathhold MRA. J Magn Reson Imag 2002;16:685-696.
31. de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM, Houben AJ, Kaandorp DW, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance flow quantification in renal arteries: comparison with 133Xenon washout measurements. Hypertension 2003;41:114-118.
32. Taylor CA, Hughes TJ, Zarins CK. Finite element modeling of three-dimensional pulsatile flow in the abdominal aorta: relevance to atherosclerosis. Ann Biomed Eng 1998;26:975-987.
33. Shalman E, Barak C, Dgany E, Noskowitcz H, Einav S, Rosenfeld M. Pressure-based simultaneous CFR and FFR measurements: understanding the physiology of a stenosed vessel. Comput Biol Med 2001;31:353-363.
34. Back MR, White RA, Kwack EY, Back LH. Hemodynamic consequences of stenosis remodeling during coronary angioplasty. Angiology 1997; 48:99-109.
35. Long Q, Xu XY, Ariff B, Thom SA, Hughes AD, Stanton AV. Reconstruction of blood flow patterns in a human carotid bifurcation: a combined CFD and MRI study. J Magn Reson Imag 2000;11:299-311.
36. Steinman DA, Thomas JB, Ladak HM, Milner JS, Rutt BK, Spence JD. Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:149-159.
37. Taylor CA, Hughes TJ, Zarins CK. Finite element modeling of three-dimensional pulsatile flow in the abdominal aorta: relevance to atherosclerosis. Ann Biomed Eng 1998;26:975-987.
38. Long Q, Xu XY, Kohler U, Robertson MB, Marshall I, Hoskins P. Quantitative comparison of CFD predicted and MRI measured velocity fields in a carotid bifurcation phantom. Biorheology 2002;39:467-474.
39. Yim PJ, Cebral JJ, Mullick R, Marcos HB, Choyke PL. Vessel surface reconstruction with a tubular deformable model. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2001;20:1411-1421.
40. Gijsen FJ, Allanic E, van de Vosse FN, Janssen JD. The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: un-steady flow in a 90 degrees curved tube. J Biomech 1999;32:705-713.