Quantitative assessment of the morphology of renal arteries from x-ray images: Quantitative vascular analysis

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 365-373

  Van Assen, Hans C ^a   Vasbinder, G Boudewijn C ^b   Stoel, Berend C ^a   Putter, Hein ^a   Van Engelshoven, Jos M A ^b   Reiber, Johan H C ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Cardiovascular; Catheterization; Intervention; Marker calibration; Renal artery; Stenosis

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RENAL ARTERY; RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION; REPRODUCIBILITY; X RAY ANALYSIS;

EID: 2442654103     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000126178.51618.13     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. White CJ, Ramee SR, Collins TJ, et al. Renal artery stent placement: utility in lesions difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1445-1450.
2. van Jaarsveld BC, Krijnen P, Pieterman H, et al. The Effect of Balloon Angioplasty on Hypertension in Atherosclerotic Renal-Artery Stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1007-1014.
3. Dorros G, Prince C, Mathiak L. Stenting of a renal-artery stenosis achieves better relief of the obstructive lesion than balloon angioplasty. Catheterization Cardiovasc Diag. 1993;29:191-198.
4. de Vries AR, Engels PH, Overtoom TT, et al. Interobserver variability in assessing renal artery stenosis by digital subtraction angiography. Diag Imaging Clin Med. 1984;53:277-281.
5. Paul JF, Cherrak I, Jaulent MC, et al. Interobserver variability in the interpretation of renal digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1285-1288.
6. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, et al. Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:158-169.
7. Schreij G, de Haan MW, Oei TK, et al. Interpretation of renal angiography by radiologists. J Hypertens. 1999;17:1737-1741.
8. Safian RD, Textor SC. Medical progress-renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:431-442.
9. Reiber JHC, Dijkstra J, Koning G, et al. Current and future developments in QCA and image fusion with IVUS. In: Reiber JHC, van der Wall EE, eds. What's New in Cardiovascular Imaging? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998:17-29.
10. Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, et al. Quantitative Coronary arteriography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation. Circulation. 1977;55:329-337.
11. Reiber JHC. Morphologic and densitometric quantitation of coronary stenoses; an overview of existing quantitation techniques. In: Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, eds. New Developments in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1988:33-88.
12. Herrington DM, Kim LS, Miller ME, et al. Visual and quantitative computerized assessment of disease severity on peripheral angiograms. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 1994;5:595-602.
13. Lespérance J, Bourassa MG, Schwartz L, et al. Definition and measurement of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: implication for clinical trials. Am Heart J. 1993;125:1394-1408.
14. Lespérance J, Bilodeau L, Reiber JHC, et al. Issues in the performance of quantitative coronary angiography in clinical research trials. In: Reiber JHC, van der Wall EE, eds. What's New in Cardiovascular Imaging? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998:31-46.
15. Nienaber CA, Schaps K-P, Stiel G. The cost-effectiveness of QCA in interventional cardiology. In: Reiber JHC, van der Wall EE, eds. What's New in Cardiovascular Imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998:47-60.
16. Reiber JHC, van der Zwet PMJ, Koning G, et al. Accuracy and Precision of Quantitative Digital Coronary Arteriography. Catheterization Cardiovasc Diag. 1993;28:187-198.
17. Simes PA, Myreng Y, Molstad P, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis. Int J Cardiac Imaging. 1996;12:197-203.
18. Reiber JHC, Serruys PW. Quantitative coronary angiography. In: Marcus ML, Schelbert HR, Skorton DJ, Wolf GL, eds. Cardiac Imaging. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1991:211-280.
19. Koning G, van der Zwet PMJ, von Land CD, et al. Angiographic Assessment of Dimensions of 6F and 7F Mallinckrodt Softouch® Coronary Contrast Catheters From Digital and Cine Arteriograms. Int J Cardiol Imaging 1992;153-161.
20. Reiber JHC, Jukema W, van Boven A, et al. Catheter sizes for quantitative coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;153-155.
21. Reiber JHC, von Land CD, Koning G, et al. Comparison of accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary arterial analysis between cinefilm and digital systems. In: Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, eds. Progress in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994:67-85.
22. van Assen HC, Vrooman HA, Egmont-Petersen M, et al. Automated Calibration in Vascular X-Ray Images Using the Accurate Localization of Catheter Marker Bands. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:219-226.
23. Hough PVC. A method and means for recognizing complex patterns. US Patent Application 3069654, 1962.
24. Reiber JHC, Schiemanck LR, van der Zwet PMJ, et al. State of the art in quantitative coronary arteriography as of 1996. In: Reiber JHC, van der Wall EE, eds. Cardiovascular Imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996:39-56.
25. van der Zwet PMJ, Reiber JHC. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:216-224.
26. Dumay ACM, Claessens MNAJ, Roos C, et al. Object Delineation in noisy images by a modified policy-iteration method. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence. 1992;14:952-958.
27. Pattynama PMT, Lamb HJ, van der Velde EA, et al. Reproducibility of MRI-Derived Measurements of Right Ventricular Volumes and Myocardial Mass. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1995;13:53-63.
28. Scheffé H. The Analysis of Variance. 4 ed. London: John Wiley and Sons; 1964.
29. Reiber JHC, Koning G, von Land CD, et al. Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Clinical Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994:1-6.
30. Janssen JP, Koning G, de Koning PJH, et al. A novel approach for the detection of pathlines in x-ray angiograms: the wavefront propagation algorithm. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2002;18:317-324.