Effects of thickness on the spin susceptibility of the two dimensional electron gas

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 22, 2005, Pages

  De Palo, S ^a   Botti, M ^a   Moroni, S ^a,b   Senatore, Gaetano ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÀ DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA   (Italy)

^b INFM Center for Statistical Mechanics and Complexity   (Italy)

^c DEMOCRITOS NATIONAL SIMULATION CENTER   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVICES; MONTE CARLO PREDICTIONS; SPIN SUSCEPTIBILITY;

ELECTRONS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; QUANTUM THEORY;

ELECTRON GAS;

EID: 27744444047     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.226405     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. E. Abrahams, S.V. Kravchenko, and M.P. Sarachik, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 251 (2001); RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.251
2. S.V. Kravchenko and M.P. Sarachik, Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 1 (2004), and references therein. RPPHAG 0034-4885 10.1088/0034-4885/67/1/R01
3. V.T. Dolgopolov, G.V. Kravchenko, A.A. Shashkin, and S.V. Kravchenko, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 46, 13303 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.13303
4. C. Castellani, C. Di Castro, and P.A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 57, R9381 1998; 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.R9381
5. see, also, C. Castellani, C. Di Castro, P.A. Lee, M. Ma, S. Sorella, and E. Tabet, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 33, 6169 (1986); 10.1103/PhysRevB.33. 6169
6. D. Belitz and T.R. Kirkpatrick, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 261 (1994). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.66.261
7. T. Okamoto, K. Hosoya, S. Kawaji, and A. Yagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3875 (1999). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3875
8. A.A. Shashkin, S.V. Kravchenko, V.T. Dolgopolov, and T.M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 086801 (2001). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.086801
9. V.M. Pudalov, M.E. Gershenson, H. Kojima, N. Butch, E.M. Dizhur, G. Brunthaler, A. Prinz, and G. Bauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 196404 (2002). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.196404
10. S.A. Vitkalov, M.P. Sarachik, and T.M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 65, 201106(R) (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.201106
11. E. Tutuc, S. Melinte, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 36805 (2002); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.036805
12. E. Tutuc, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 67, 241309(R) (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.241309
13. J. Zhu, H.L. Stormer, L.N. Pfeiffer, K.W. Baldwin, and K.W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 56805 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.056805
14. K. Vakili, Y.P. Shkolnikov, E. Tutuc, E.P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 226401 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 226401
15. Y.P. Shkolnikov, K. Vakili, E.P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246804 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.246804
16. C. Attaccalite, S. Moroni, P. Gori-Giorgi, and GB. Bachelet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 256601 (2002). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.256601
17. T. Ando, A.B. Fowler, and Frank Stern, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 437 (1982). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.54.437
18. P. Gori-Giorgi, S. Moroni, and G.B. Bachelet, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 70, 115102 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.115102
19. F.C. Zhang and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 33, 2903R (1986), and references therein. 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.2903
20. For the considered HIGFET the depletion is negligible [H. Stormer (private communication)] and we set nd=0.
21. A. Gold, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 35, 723 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.723
22. [S. De Palo, G. Senatore, M. Botti, and S. Moroni, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. BAPSA6 0003-0503 49, 1303 (2004)].
23. F.F. Fang and P.J. Stiles, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 174, 823 (1968). 10.1103/PhysRev.174.823
24. See, e.g., A. Gold, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2100 (1989). APPLAB 0003-6951 10.1063/1.101176
25. Jun Zhu, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, 2003.
26. S. De Palo and G. Senatore (to be published).
27. We include disorder parameters for the real device [K. Vakili (private communication)], adjusting only the parameters for the QW width fluctuations (roughness scattering), to obtain agreement with the measured mobility.
28. S. Conti and G. Senatore, Europhys. Lett. 36, 695 (1996). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i1996-00289-y
29. F. Rapisarda and G. Senatore, Aust. J. Phys. 49, 161 (1996). AUJPAS 0004-9506