Simultaneous estimation and testing of sources in multiple MEG data sets

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 3449-3460

  Bijma, Fetsje ^a   de Munck, Jan C ^a   Huizenga, Hilde M ^b   Heethaar, Rob M ^a   Nehorai, Arye ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Component model; Confidence intervals; Constrained Cram r Rao Bound; Coupled dipole model; MEG; Spatiotemporal covariance; Trilinear model

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CONSTRAINED CRAMER-RAO BOUND; EXTENDED COUPLE DIPOLE MODEL; SPATIOTEMPORAL COVARIANCE; TRILINEAR MODEL;

MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

EID: 27644577859     PISSN: 1053587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2005.853097     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. A. Achim and S. Bouchard, "Toward a dynamic topographic components model," Electroenc. Clin. Neur, vol. 103, pp. 381-385, 1997,
2. F. Bijma, J. C. d. Munck, H. M. Huizenga, and R. M. Heethaar, "A mathematical approach to the temporal stationarity of background noise in MEG/EEG measurements," NeuroImag., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 233-243, 2003.
3. F. Bijma, J. C. de Munck, K. B. E. Böcker, H. M. Huizenga, and R. M. Heethaar, "The coupled dipole model: An integrated model for multiple MEG/EEG data sets," NeumImag., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 890-904, 2004.
4. J. C. de Munck, H. M. Huizenga, L. J. Waldorp, and R. M. Heethaar, "Estimating stationary dipoles from MEG/EEG data contaminated with spatially and temporally correlated background noise," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1565-1572, Jul. 2002.
5. J. C. de Munck, F. Bijma, P. Gaura, C. Sieluzycki, M. I. Branco, and R. M. Heethaar, "A mathematical description of habituation effects in multi channel MEG/EEG data," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 2123-2128, Dec. 2004.
6. A. Dogandžiç and A. Nehorai, "Localization of evoked electric sources and design of EEG/MEG sensor arrays," in Proc. 9th IEEE SP Workshop Stat. Signal Array Process., Portland, OR, Sep. 1998, pp. 228-231.
7. A. Dogandžiç and A. Nehorai, "Estimated evoked dipole responses in unknown spatially correlated noise with EEG/MEG arrays," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 13-25, Jan. 2000.
8. A. Dogandžiç and A. Nehorai, "Generalized multivariate analysis of variance," IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 39-54, Sep. 2003.
9. M. Fuchs, M. Wagner, and J. Kastner, "Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results," Clin. Neurophys., vol. 115, pp. 1442-1451, 2004.
10. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Univ. Press, 1990.
11. H. M. Huizenga and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Estimating and testing the sources of evoked-potentials in the brain," Multivar. Behav. Res., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 237-262, 1994.
12. H. M. Huizenga, T. L. van Zuijen, and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis," Psys. Med. Biol., vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1737-1751, 2001.
13. H. M. Huizenga, J. C. de Munck, L. J. Waldorp, and R. P. P. P. Grasman, "Spatiotemporal EEG/MEG source analysis based on a parametric noise covariance model," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 533-539, Jun. 2002.
14. H. M. Huizenga, D. J. Heslenfeld, and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Optimal measurement conditions for spatiotemporal EEG/MEG source analysis," Psychometrika, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 299-313, 2002.
15. J. Huttunen, R. Hari, and L. Leinonen, "Cerebral magnetic responses to stimulation of ulnar and median nerves," Electroenc. Clin. Neur., vol. 66, pp. 391-400, 1987.
16. S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993.
17. C. G. Khatri, A Note on a MANOVA Model Applied to Problems in Gmwth Curve: Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 1966, vol. 18, pp. 75-86.
18. J. R. Magnus and H. Neudecker, Matrix Differential Calculus With Applications in Statistics and Econometrics, revised ed. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 1995.
19. J. Maier, G. Dagnelie, H. Spekreijse, and B. W. van Dijk, "Principal components analysis for source localization of veps in man," Vision Res., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 165-177, 1987.
20. F. Mauguiére, I. Merlet, N. Forss, S. Vanni, V. Jousmäki, P. Adeleine, and R. Hari, "Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modeling study of magnetic tileds evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: Location and activation timing of sef sources," Electroenc. Clin. Neur., vol. 104, pp. 281-289, 1997.
21. C. D. McGillem and J. I. Aunon, "Analysis of event-related potentials," in Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals, EEG Handbook, A. S. Gevins and A. Remond, Eds. Amsterdam, Te Netherlands: Elsevier, 1987, ch. 5.
22. F. Miwakeichi, E. Martínez-Montes, P. A. Valdés-Sosa, N. Nishiyama, H. Mizuhara, and Y. Yamaguchi, "Decomposing EEG data into space-time-frequency components using parallel factor analysis," NeuroImag., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1035-1045, 2004.
23. J. Möcks, "Topographic components models for event related potentials and some biophysical considerations," IEEE Biomed. Eng., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 482-484, June 1988.
24. J. C. Mosher, M. E. Spencer, R. M. Leahy, and P. S. Lewis, "Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization," Electroenc. Clin. Neur., vol. 86, pp. 303-321, 1993.
25. C. H. Muravchik and A. Nehorai, "EEG/MEG error bounds for a static dipole source with a realistic head model," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 470-484, Mar. 2001.
26. C. R. Rao, Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1973.
27. G. A. F. Seber and C. J. Wild, Nonlinear Regression. New York: Wiley, 1989.
28. M. S. Srivastava and C. G. Khatri, An Introduction to Multivariate Statistics New York, North-Holland, 1979.
29. P. Stoica and B. C. Ng, "On the Cramèr-Rao Bound under parametric constraints," IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 177-179, Jul. 1998.
30. B. Turetsky, J. Raz, and G. Fein, "Representation of multi-channel evoked potential data using a dipole component model of intracranial generators: Application to the auditory," Electroenc. Clin. Neur., vol. 76, pp. 540-556, 1990.
31. E. F. Vonesh and V. M. Chinchilli, Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurments. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997.
32. L. J. Waldorp, H. M. Huizenga, C. V. Dolan, and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Estimated generalized least squares electromagnetic source analysis based on a parametric noise covariance model," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 737-741, Jun. 2001.
33. L. J. Waldorp, H. M. Huizenga, R. P. P. PGrasman, K. B. E. Böcker, J. C. de Munck, and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Model selection in electromagnetic source analysis with an application to vefs," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1121-1129, Oct. 2002.
34. K. M. Wang, H. Begleiter, and B. Porjesz, "Trilinear modeling of event-related potentials," Brain Topograph., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 263-271, 2000.