Virtual colonoscopy by MRI: State-of-the-art and future directions

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 797-811

  Lauenstein, Thomas C ^a   Ajaj, Waleed ^a   Kuehle, Christiane A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANAPHYLAXIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLON POLYP; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COLORECTAL DISEASE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING; NEPHROTOXICITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGAN SIZE; PAIN; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM POLYP; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FECES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 27644474883     PISSN: 10525157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2005.08.013     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. S.H. Landis, T. Murray, and S. Bodden Cancer statistics, 1998 CA Cancer J Clin 48 1998 6 29
2. H. Neuhaus Screening for colorectal cancer in Germany: guidelines and reality Endoscopy 31 6 1999 468 470
3. M.J. O'Brien, S.J. Winawer, and A.G. Zauber The National Polyp Study: patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas Gastroenterology 98 1990 371 379
4. S.J. Winawer, M.J. O'Brien, and J.D. Waye Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps: WHO Collaborating Center for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer Bull World Health Organ 68 1990 789 795
5. R. Murakami, H. Tsukuma, and S. Kanamori Natural history of colorectal polyps and the effect of polypectomy on occurrence of cancer Int J Cancer 46 1990 159 164
6. S.J. Winawer, A.G. Zauber, and M.N. Ho Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy: the National Polyp Study Workgroup N Engl J Med 329 1993 1977 1981
7. D.A. Ahlquist, H.S. Wieland, and C.G. Moertel Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia: a prospective study using Hemoccult and HemoQuant tests JAMA 269 1993 1262 1267
8. D.K. Rex, E.Y. Rahmani, and J.H. Haseman Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice Gastroenterology 112 1997 17 23
9. D. Lieberman Colon cancer screening: beyond efficacy Gastroenterology 106 1994 803 807
10. D.J. Frommer What's new in colorectal cancer screening? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13 1998 528 533
11. E.G. McFarland, J.A. Brink, and T.K. Pilgram Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques Radiology 218 2001 375 383
12. G. Dafnis, F. Granath, and L. Pahlman Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy Dig Liver Dis 37 2 2005 113 118
13. W.C. Cirocco, and L.C. Rusin Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy Dis Colon Rectum 389 1995 964 968
14. J.B. Marshall, and J.S. Barthel The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s Gastrointest Endosc 39 1993 518 520
15. W. Luboldt, P. Bauerfeind, and S. Wildermuth Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography Radiology 216 2000 383 388
16. G. Pappalardo, E. Polettini, and F.M. Frattaroli Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions Gastroenterology 119 2 2000 300 304
17. W. Ajaj, G. Pelster, and U. Treichel Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology Gut 52 12 2003 1738 1743
18. T.C. Lauenstein, C.U. Herborn, and F.M. Vogt Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience Rofo 173 9 2001 785 789
19. Hartmann D., Bassler B., Schilling D., et al. Prospective comparison of dark lumen MR colonography and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Radiology, in press
20. P.J. Pickhardt, J.R. Choi, and I. Hwang Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 349 23 2003 2191 2200
21. J. Sosna, M.M. Morrin, and J.B. Kruskal CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 6 2003 1593 1598
22. C.D. Johnson, W.S. Harmsen, and L.A. Wilson Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps Gastroenterology 125 2 2003 311 319
23. M. Macari, E.J. Bini, and S.L. Jacobs Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography Radiology 230 3 2004 629 636
24. J. van Dam, P. Cotton, C.D. Johnson American Gastroenterological Association AGA future trends report: CT colonography Gastroenterology 127 3 2004 970 984
25. J.F. Debatin, W. Luboldt, and P. Bauerfeind Virtual colonoscopy in 1999: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging? Endoscopy 31 2 1999 174 179
26. K.J. Murphy, J.A. Brunberg, and R.H. Cohan Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 1996 847 849
27. M.R. Prince, C. Arnoldus, and J.K. Frisoli Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast J Magn Reson Imaging 6 1996 162 166
28. R.T. Villavicencio, and D.K. Rex Colonic adenomas: prevalence and incidence rates, growth rates, and miss rates at colonoscopy Semin Gastrointest Dis 11 2000 185 193
29. G. Steidle, J. Schafer, and H.P. Schlemmer Two-dimensional parallel acquisition technique in 3D MR colonography Rofo 176 2004 1100 1105
30. M.A. Griswold, P.M. Jakob, and R.M. Heidemann Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) Magn Reson Med 47 2002 1202 1210
31. T.C. Lauenstein, W. Ajaj, and C.A. Kuehle Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience Invest Radiol 40 2 2005 89 96
32. W. Ajaj, T.C. Lauenstein, and G. Pelster MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy Radiology 234 2 2005 452 459
33. S. Gryspeerdt, P. Lefere, and M. Herman CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy Eur Radiol 15 6 2005 1192 1202
34. E. Neri, P. Giusti, and L. Battolla Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy Radiology 223 3 2002 615 619
35. S.J. Winawer, A.G. Zauber, and M.J. O'Brien The National Polyp Study: design, methods, and characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed polyps Cancer 70 1992 1236 1245
36. B.J. Winkleman, D.E. Matthews, and E.A. Wiebke Colorectal cancer screening at a Veterans Affairs hospital Am J Surg 186 2003 468 471
37. R. Fiocca, and P. Ceppa The diagnostic reliability of endoscopic biopsies in diagnosis colitis J Clin Pathol 56 2003 321 322
38. S. Nahon, Y. Bouhnik, and A. Lavergne-Slove Colonoscopy accurately predicts the anatomical severity of colonic Crohn's disease attacks: correlation with findings from colectomy specimens Am J Gastroenterol 12 2002 3102 3107
39. U. Kettritz, K. Isaacs, and D.M. Warshauer Crohn's disease: pilot study comparing MRI of the abdomen with clinical evaluation J Clin Gastroenterol 3 1995 249 253
40. D.M. Koh, Y. Miao, and R.J. Chinn MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease AJR Am J Roentgenol 6 2001 1325 1332
41. W. Ajaj, T.C. Lauenstein, and G. Pelster MR colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity Gut 54 2 2005 257 263
42. A.G. Schreyer, S. Golder, and K. Scheibl Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: first clinical experience Inflamm Bowel Dis 11 4 2005 388 394
43. A.G. Schreyer, H.C. Rath, and R. Kikinis Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study Gut 54 2 2005 250 256
44. B. Narin, W. Ajaj, and S. Gohde Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: a feasibility study Eur Radiol 14 2004 1535 1542
45. W.S. Cobb, B.T. Heniford, and L.B. Sigmon Colonoscopic perforations: incidence, management, and outcomes Am Surg 70 9 2004 750 757
46. M.J. Elwood, G. Ali, and M.T. Schlup Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy for colorectal screening: a randomized trial of performance and acceptability Cancer Detect Prev 19 1995 337 347
47. M. Thomeer, D. Bielen, and D. Vanbeckevoort Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol 12 6 2002 1410 1415
48. T. Lauenstein, G. Holtmann, and D. Schoenfelder MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 2001 823 827
49. T.C. Lauenstein, S.C. Goehde, and S.G. Ruehm MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience Radiology 223 2002 248 254
50. N. Papanikolaou, J. Grammatikakis, and T. Maris MR colonography with fecal tagging: comparison between 2D turbo FLASH and 3D FLASH sequences Eur Radiol 13 2003 448 452
51. W. Ajaj, T.C. Lauenstein, and H. Schneemann Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking) - a feasability study Eur Radiol 15 2005 2079 2087