Testing alternative captive breeding strategies with the subsequent release into the wild

Zoo Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 375-392

  Meffert, Lisa M ^a   Mukana, Nsuela ^a   Hicks, Sara K ^a   Day, Stacey B ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial selection; Environmental stress; Inbreeding depression; Maximum avoidance of inbreeding; Purge

Indexed keywords

MUSCA DOMESTICA;

EID: 27544448056     PISSN: 07333188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/zoo.20058     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Armbruster P, Hutchinson RA, Linvell T. 2000. Equivalent inbreeding depression under laboratory and field condition in a tree-hole-breeding mosquito. Proc Biol Sci 267:1939-45.
2. Allendorf F, Leary RF. 1988. Conservation and distribution of genetic variation in a polytypic species. Conserv Biol 2:170-84.
3. Avise JC, Nelson WS. 1989. Molecular genetic relationships of the extinct dusky seaside sparrow. Science 243:646-8.
4. Backus VL, Bryant EH, Hughes CR, and Meffert LM. 1995. Effect of migration or inbreeding followed by selection on low founder-number populations: implication for captive breeding programs. Conserv Biol 9:1216-24.
5. Ballou JD. 1997. Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. J Hered 88:169-78.
6. Ballou JD, Lacy RC. 1995. Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic variation in pedigreed populations. In: Ballou JD, Gilpin M, Foose TJ, editors. Population management for survival and recovery: analytical methods and strategies in small population conservation. New York: Columbia Press. p 76-111.
7. Ballou JD, Gilpin M, Foose TJ, editors. 1995. Population management for survival and recovery: analytical methods and strategies in small population conservation. New York: Columbia Press. 375 p.
8. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, van Putten WF. 1999. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 12:1125-37.
9. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Boerema AC. 2000. Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations?: predictions from Drosophila. J Evol Biol 13:502-14.
10. Black WC, Krafsur ES. 1985. Electrophoretic analysis of genetic variability in the house fly (Musca domestica L.). Biochem Genet 23:193-203.
11. Borlase SC, Loebel DA, Frankham R, Nurthen RK, Briscoe DA, Daggard GE. 1993. Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: consequences of equalization of family sizes. Conserv Biol 7:122-31.
12. Brown BW, Russell K. 1997. Methods correcting for multiple testing: operating characteristics. Stat Med 16:2511-28.
13. Bryant EH, Meffert LM, McCommas SA. 1990. Fitness rebound in serially bottlenecked populations of the house fly. Am Nat 136:543-49.
14. Byers DL, Waller DM. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:479-513.
15. Comizzoli P, Mermillod P, Mauget R. 2000. Reproductive technologies for endangered mammalian species. Reprod Nutr Dev 40:493-504.
16. Crnokrak P, Barrett SCH. 2002. Perspective: purging the genetic load. A review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347-58.
17. Crow JF. 1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J, editors. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Vol. 9. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p 3-42.
18. Day SB, Bryant EH, Meffert LM. 2003. The influence of variable rates of inbreeding on fitness, environmental responsiveness, and evolutionary potential. Evolution 57:1314-24.
19. Falconer DS. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd Ed. New York: Longman. 340 p.
20. Fernández J, López-Fanjul C. 1997. Spontaneous mutational genotype-environment interaction for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 51:856-64.
21. Finner H. 1993. On a monotonicity problem in step-down multiple test procedures. J Am Stat Assoc 88:920-23.
22. Ford MJ. 2002. Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv Biol 16:815-25.
23. Fowler K, Whitlock MC. 2002. Environmental stress, inbreeding, and the nature of phenotypic and genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci 269:677-83.
24. Frankham R. 1995. Inbreeding and extinction: a threshold effect. Conserv Biol 9:792-9.
25. Frankham R, Loebel DA. 1992. Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: rapid genetic adaptation to captivity. Zoo Biol 11:333-42.
26. Frankham R, Smith GJ, Briscoe DA. 1993. Effects on heterozygosity and reproductive fitness of inbreeding with and without selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Theor Appl Genet 86:1023-27.
27. Frankham RB, Yoo H, Sheldon BL. 1988. Reproductive fitness and artificial selection in animal breeding: culling on fitness prevents a decline in reproductive fitness in lines of Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased inebriation time. Theor Appl Genet 76:909-14.
28. Frankham R, Gilligan DM, Morris D, Briscoe DA. 2001. Inbreeding and extinction: effects of purging. Conserv Genet 2:279-85.
29. Franklin IR. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA, editors. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Maryland: Sinauer Associates. p 135-49.
30. Fu Y, Namkoong G, Carlson JE. 1998. Comparison of breeding strategies for purging inbreeding depression via simulation. Conserv Biol 12:856-64.
31. García N, López-Fanjul C, García-Dorado A. 1994. The genetics of viability in Drosophila melanogaster: effects of inbreeding and artificial selection. Evolution 48:1277-85.
32. Glatston AR. 2001. Relevance of studbook data to the successful captive management of grey mouse lemurs. Int J Primatol 22:57-69.
33. Hedrick PW. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. J Hered 73:363-72.
34. Hedrick PW. 2000. Genetics of populations. 2nd. Ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. 553 p.
35. Hedrick PW, Kalinowski ST. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:139-62.
36. Hollingsworth MJ, Maynard Smith J. 1955. The effects of inbreeding on rate of development and on fertility in Drosophila subobscura. J Genet 53:295-314.
37. Jiménez JA, Hughes KA, Alaks G, Graham L, and Lacy RC. 1994. An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science 266:271-73.
38. Kalinowski ST, Hedrick PW, Miller PS. 2000. Inbreeding depression in the Speke's gazelle captive breeding program. Conserv Biol 14:1375-84.
39. Kristensen TY, Dahlgaard J, Loeschcke V. 2003. Effects of inbreeding and environmental stress on fitness - using Drosophila buzzatii as a model organism. Conserv Genet 4:453-65.
40. Lacy RL, Alaks G, Walsh A. 1996. Hierarchical analysis of inbreeding depression in Peromyscus polionotus. Evolution 50:2187-200.
41. Laikre L, Ryman N, Thomson EA. 1993. Hereditary blindness in a captive wolf (Canis lupus) population: frequency reduction of a deleterious allele in relation to gene conservation. Conserv Biol 7:592-601.
42. Lande R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455-60.
43. Lande R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conserv Biol 9:782-91.
44. Latter BDH, Mulley JC, Reid D, Pascoe L. 1995. Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139:287-97.
45. Leopold RA, Terranova AC, Swilley EM. 1971. Mating refusal in Musca domestica: effects of repeated mating and decerebration upon frequency and duration of copulation. J Exp Zool 176:353-60.
46. Levin DA, Francisco-Ortega J, Janzsen RK. 1996. Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conserv Biol 10:10-16.
47. Lynch M, O'Hely M. 2001. Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conserv Genet 2:363-78.
48. Maehr DS, Caddick GB. 1995. Demographics and genetic introgression in the Florida panther. Conserv Biol 9:1295-98.
49. McDonald IC, Nelson DR, Johnson OA, Filipi PA, Cardwell DL. 1978. House fly genetics: inheritance patterns of phosphoglucomutase, hexokinase, and glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase isozymes. Ann Entomol Soc Am 71:99-102.
50. Meagher S, Penn DJ, Potts WK. 2000. Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3324-29.
51. Meffert LM, Regan JL, Brown BW. 1999. Convergent evolution of the mating behaviour of founder-flush populations of the housefly. J Evol Biol 12:859-68.
52. Miller PS. 1994. Is inbreeding depression more severe in a stressful environment? Zoo Biol 13:195-208.
53. Miller PS. 1995. Selective breeding programs for rare alleles: examples from the Przewalski's Horse and California condor pedigrees. Conserv Biol 9:1262-73.
54. Miller PS, Hedrick PW. 2001. Purging inbreeding depression and fitness decline in bottlenecked population of Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 14:595-601.
55. Montgomery ME, Ballou JD, Nurthen RK, England PR, Briscoe DA, Frankham R. 1997. Minimizing kinship in captive breeding programs. Zoo Biol 16:377-89.
56. Packer C, Pusey AE, Rowley H, Gilbert DA, Martenson J, O'Brien SJ. 1991. Case study of a population bottleneck: lions of the Ngorongoro crater. Conserv Biol 5:219-30.
57. Pray LA, Goodnight CJ. 1995. Genetic variation in inbreeding depression in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 49:176-88.
58. Pray LA., Schwartz JM, Goodnight CJ, Stevens L. 1994. Environmental dependency of inbreeding depression: implications for conservation biology. Conserv Biol 8:562-8.
59. Princée FPG. 1995. Overcoming the constraints of social structure and incomplete pedigree data through low-intensity genetic management. In: Ballou JD, Gilpin ME, Foose TJ, editors. Population management for survival and recovery: analytical methods and strategies in small population conservation. New York: Columbia Press. p 124-54.
60. Rabinowitz A. 1995. Helping a species go extinct: the Sumatran rhino in Borneo. Conserv Biol 9:482-88.
61. Reed D, Bryant EH. 2001. Fitness, genetic load and purging in experimental populations of the housefly. Conserv Genet 2:57-62.
62. Reed DH, Briscoe DA, Frankham R. 2002. Inbreeding and extinction: the effect of environmental stress and lineage. Conserv Genet 3:301-7.
63. Reed DH, Lowe EH, Brisco DA, Frankham R. 2003. Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage. Evolution 57:1822-28.
64. Rose MR. 1984. Artificial selection on a fitness component in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:516-26.
65. Ryman N, Jorde PE, Laikre L. 1995. Supportive breeding and variance effective population size. Conserv Biol 9:1619-28.
66. Saccheri I, Brakefield PM, Nichols RA. 1996. Severe inbreeding depression and rapid fitness rebound in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Evolution 50:2000-13.
67. SAS Institute. 1988. SAS user's guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
68. Snyder NFR, Derrickson SR, Beissinger SR, Wiley JW, Smith TB, Toome WD, Miller B. 1996. Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conserv Biol 10:338-48.
69. Soulé ME, Wilcox BA, editors. 1980. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. 584 p.
70. Taylor BL, Gerrodette T. 1993. The uses of statistical power in conservation biology: the Vaquita and Northern spotted owl. Conserv Biol 7:489-500.
71. Templeton AR. 2002. The Speke's gazelle breeding program as an illustration of the importance of multilocus genetic diversity in conservation biology: response to Kalinowski et al. Conserv Biol 16:1151-55.
72. Templeton AR, Read B. 1983. The elimination of inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke's gazelle. In: Shonewald-Cox M, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas L, editors. Genetics and conservation: a reference manual for managing wild animal and plant populations. London: Benjamin Cummings. p 241-61.
73. Templeton AR, Read B. 1998. Elimination of inbreeding depression from a captive population of Speke's gazelle: validity of the original statistical analysis and confirmation by permutation testing. Zoo Biol 17:77-94.
74. van Oosterhout C, Smit G, van Heuven MK, Brakefield PM. 2000. Pedigree analysis on small laboratory populations of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: the effects of selection on inbreeding and fitness. Conserv Genet 4:321-28.
75. Wang J. 2000. Effects of population structures and selection strategies on the purging of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations. Genet Res 76:75-86.
76. Wang J, Hill WG, Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1999. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: Mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet Res 74:165-78.
77. Wayne RK, Bruford MW, Girman O, Rebholz WER, Sunnucks P, Taylor AC. 1994. Molecular genetics of endangered species. In: Olney PJS, Mace GM, Feister ATC, editors. Creative conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals. London: Chapman and Hall. p 92-117.
78. Willis K, Wiese RJ. 1997. Elimination of inbreeding depression from captive populations: Speke's gazelle revisited. Zoo Biol 16:9-16.
79. Winer BJ. 1962. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill. 672 p.
80. Woodworth LM, Montgomery ME, Briscoe DA, Frankham R. 2002. Rapid genetic deterioration in captive populations: causes and conservation implications. Conserv Genet 3:277-88.