Convergent evolution of the mating behaviour of founder-flush populations of the housefly

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 859-868

  Meffert, L M ^a   Regan, J L ^b   Brown, B W ^c  

^a University of Houston   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bottlenecks; Convergent evolution; Laboratory adaptation; Mating behaviour; Mutational meltdowns; Speciation

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; COURTSHIP; FLY; MATE CHOICE; MATING BEHAVIOR;

DIPTERA;

EID: 0032860898     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00105.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Arnold, S.J., Verrell, P.A. & Tilley, S.G. 1996. The evolution of asymmetry in sexual isolation: a model and a test case. Evolution 50: 1024-1033.
2. Barton, N.H. & Charlesworth, B. 1984. Genetic revolutions, founder events, and speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 133-164.
3. Boake, C.R.B. 1989. Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evol. Ecol. 3: 173-182.
4. Brown, B.B. & Russell, K. 1997. Methods correcting multiple testing: operating characteristics. Stat. Med. 16: 2511-2528.
5. Bryant, E.H. & Meffert, L.M. 1993. The effects of serial bottlenecks on quantitative genetic variation in the housefly. Heredity 70: 122-129.
6. Bryant, E.H., Meffert, L.M. & McCommas, S.A. 1990. Fitness rebound in serially bottlenecked populations of the house fly. Amer. Natur. 136: 543-549.
7. Carson, H.L. 1968. The population flush and its genetic consequences. In: Population Biology and Evolution (R. C. Lewontin, ed.), pp. 123-137. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse.
8. Carson, H.L. 1990. Increased genetic variation after a bottleneck. Tr. Ecol. Evol. 5: 228-230.
9. Charlesworth, B. & Rouhani, S. 1988. The probability of peak shifts in a founder population. II. An additive polygenic trait. Evolution 42: 1129-1145.
10. Cheverud, J.M. & Routman, E.J. 1996. Epistasis as a source of increased additive genetic variance at population bottlenecks. Evolution 50: 1042-1051.
11. Crow, J.F. 1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. In: Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 9 (D. Futuyma & J. Antonovics, eds), pp. 3-42. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Dobzhansky, T. & Spassky, B. 1947. Evolutionary changes in laboratory cultures of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 1: 191-216.
13. Dodd, D.M.B. & Powell, J.R. 1985. Founder-flush speciation: an update of experimental results with Drosophila. Evolution 39: 1388-1392.
14. Ehrman, L. 1969. Genetic divergence in M. Vetukhiv's experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. 5. A further study of rudiments of sexual isolation. Am. Midl. Natur. 82: 272-276.
15. Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, New York.
16. Faugeres, A., Petit, C. & Thibout, E. 1971. The components of sexual selection. Evolution 25: 265-275.
17. Fisher, R.A. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Dover, New York.
18. Galiana, A., Moya, A. & Ayala, F.J. 1993. Founder-flush speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscura: a large-scale experiment. Evolution 47: 432-444.
19. Garcià, N., López-Fanjul, C. & Garcia-Dorado, A. 1994. The genetics of viability in Drosophila melanogaster: effects of inbreeding and artificial selection. Evolution 48: 1277-1285.
20. Gilbert, D.G. & Starmer, W.T. 1986. Statistics of sexual isolation. Evolution 39: 1380-1383.
21. Gimmelfarb, A. 1989. Genotypic variation for a quantitative character maintained under stabilizing selection without mutations: epistasis. Genetics 123: 217-227.
22. Goodnight, C.J. 1988. Epistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance. Evolution 42: 441-454.
23. Hedrick, P.W. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73: 363-372.
24. Hollingsworth, M.J. & Maynard Smith, J. 1955. The effects of inbreeding on rate of development and on fertility in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet. 53: 295-314.
25. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scan. J. Stat. 6: 65-70.
26. Husband, B.C. & Barrett, S.C.H. 1995. Estimating effective population size: a reply to Nunney. Evolution 49: 392-394.
27. Kaneshiro, K.Y. 1989. The dynamics of sexual selection and founder effects in species formation. In: Genetics, Speciation, and the Founder Principle (L. V. Giddings, K. Y. Kaneshiro & W. W. Anderson, eds), pp. 279-296. Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
29. Lande, R. 1994. Risk of population extinction from new deleterious mutations. Evolution 48: 1460-1469.
30. Lande, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Cons. Biol. 9: 782-791.
31. Lande, R. & Barrowclough, G.F. 1987. Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In: Viable Populations for Conservation (M. E. Soulé, ed.), pp. 87-123. Cambridge University Press, New York.
32. Lints, F.A. & Bourgois, M. 1982. A test of the genetic revolution hypothesis of speciation. In: Advances in Genetics, Development and Evolution of Drosophila (S. Lakovaara, ed.), pp. 157-180. Plenum, New York.
33. López-Fanjul, C. & Villaverde, A. 1989. Inbreeding increases genetic variance for viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 43: 1800-1804.
34. Lynch, M. 1988. Design and analysis of experiments on random drift and inbreeding depression. Genetics 120: 791-807.
35. Lynch, M., Conery, J. & Bürger, R. 1995. Mutational meltdowns in sexual populations. Evolution 49: 1067-1080.
36. Markow, T.A. 1981. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 35: 1022-1026.
37. Mayr, E. 1954. Change of the genetic environment and evolution. In: Evolution as a Genetic Process (J. Huxley, ed.), pp. 157-180. Allen and Unwin, London.
38. Meffert, L.M. 1995. Bottleneck effects on genetic variance for courtship repertoire. Genetics 139: 365-374.
39. Meffert, L.M. & Bryant, E.H. 1991. Mating propensity and courtship behavior in serially bottlenecked lines of the housefly. Evolution 45: 293-306.
40. Meffert, L. & Bryant, E.H. 1992. Divergent ambulatory and grooming behavior in serially bottlenecked lines of the housefly. Evolution 46: 1399-1407.
41. Miller, R.G. Jr. 1966. Simultaneous Statistical Inference. McGraw-Hill, New York.
42. Moya, A., Galiana, A. & Ayala, F. 1995. Founder-effect speciation theory: failure of experimental corroboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92: 3983-3986.
43. Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Chakraborty, R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1-10.
44. Noldus, L.P.J.J. 1990. The Observer Base Package, Version 2.0. Noldus Information Technology, Wagenengen, The Netherlands.
45. Nunney, L. 1993. The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47: 1329-1341.
46. Otte, D. & Endler, J.A., eds. 1989. Speciation and its Consequences. Sinauer and Associates, Mass.
47. Pimentel, R.A. 1979. Morphometrics: the Multivariate Analysis of Biological Data. Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa.
48. Powell, J.R. 1989. The effects of founder-flush cycles on ethological isolation in laboratory populations of Drosophila. In: Genetics, Speciation, and the Founder Principle (L. V. Giddings, K. Y. Kaneshiro & W. W. Anderson, eds), pp. 239-251. Oxford University Press, New York.
49. Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
50. Ringo, J., Barton, K. & Dowse, H. 1986. The effect of genetic drift on mating propensity, courtship behavior, and postmating fitness in Drosophila simulans. Behaviour 97: 226-233.
51. Robertson, F. 1955. Selectional response and the properties of genetic variation. Cold Spr. Harbor Symp Quant. Biol. 20: 166-177.
52. Rundle, H.D., Mooers, A.Ø. & Whitlock, M.C. 1998. Single founder-flush events and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 52: 1850-1855.
53. SAS Institute, Inc. 1985. SAS/IML, Version 5. SAS Inc., Cary, NC.
54. Sharp, P.M. 1984. The effect of inbreeding on competitive male-mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106: 601-612.
55. Simes, R.J. 1986. An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73: 751-754.
56. Slatkin, M. 1996. In defense of founder-flush theories of speciation. Amer. Natur. 147: 493-505.
57. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1969. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
58. SPSSX, Inc. 1986. Release 2.1. SPSSX, Inc., Chicago, IL.
59. Taylor, C.E. 1975. Differences in mating propensities: some models for examining the genetic consequences. Behav. Genet. 5: 381-393.
60. Templeton, A.R. 1979. Once again, why 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? Evolution 33: 513-517.
61. Templeton, A.R. 1980. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics 94: 1101-1038.
62. Templeton, A.R. 1996. Experimental evidence for the genetic-transilience model of speciation. Evolution 50: 909-915.
63. Wade, M.J. & Goodnight, C.J. 1991. Wright's shifting balance theory: an experimental study. Science 253 (1015): 1018.
64. Wade, M.J., Shuster, S.M. & Stevens, L. 1996. Inbreeding: its effect on response to selection for pupal weight and the heritable variance in fitness in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 50: 723-733.
65. Whitlock, M.C., Phillips, P.C., Moore, F.B.-G. & Tonsor, S.J. 1995. Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 601-629.
66. Willis, J.H. & Orr, H.A. 1993. Increased heritable variation following population bottlenecks: the role of dominance. Evolution 47: 949-956.
67. Wright, S. 1977. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.