From global sustainability to inclusive education: Understanding urban children's ideas about the food system

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1163-1186

  Barton, Angela Calabrese ^a   Koch, Pamela D ^a   Contento, Isobel R ^a   Hagiwara, Sumi ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27444446504     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690500069467     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press.
2. Atwater, M., Wiggins, J., & Gardner, C. (1995). A study of urban middle school students with high and low attitudes toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 665-677.
3. Barker, M. (1985). Teaching and Learning about Photosynthesis. Science education research unit, Working Paper 220-9. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
4. Bell, B. (1985). The construction of meaning and conceptual change in classroom settings: Case studies on plant nutrition. Centre for Studies in Science and Math Education, University of Leeds.
5. Bouillion, L., & Gomez, L. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899-917.
6. Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Refraining 'science for all' through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12(5), 525-541.
7. Contento, I. R. (1981). Children's thinking about food and eating: A Piagetian-based study. Journal of Nutrition Education, 13, S86-S90.
8. Contento, I. R. (1995). The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy, programs and research. Journal of Nutrition Education, 27, 279-418.
9. Contento, I., Calabrese Barton, A., & Koch, P. (2000). Linking Food and the Environment. Technical Report to the National Institutes of Health.
10. Driver, R. Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. New York: Routledge.
11. Duschl, R. (1983). The elementary level science methods course: Breeding ground of an apprehension toward science? A case study. Science Education, 20, 745-754.
12. Eisen, Y., & Stavey, R. (1988). Students' understandings of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 50(4), 208-212.
13. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter Press.
14. Gussow, J. D. (1991). Will green marketing save the planet? World Hunger Year, 7, 21.
15. Gussow, J. D. (1999). Dietary guidelines for sustainability: Twelve years later. Journal of Nutrition Education, 31(4), 194.
16. Michela, J. L., & Contento, I. R. (1984). Spontaneous classification of foods by elementary school-aged children. Healthy Education Quarterly, 11, 57-76.
17. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
19. Oakes, J., Muir, K., & Joseph, R. (2000). Coursetaking and achievement: Inequalities that endure and change. Keynote presentation at the National Institute for Science Education Annual Meeting, Detroit, MI.
20. Orr, D. (1992). The economics of conservation. Surviving Together, 70(4), 7-21.
21. Pimentel, D., Herdendorf, M., & Eisenfeld, S. (1994). Achieving a secure energy future: Environmental and economic issues. Ecological economics, 9(3), 201-218.
22. Public Health Service. (2001). Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Service.
23. Rahm, J., Miller, H., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher-scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 737-756.
24. Rodriguez, A. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 19-38.
25. Roth, K., & Anderson, C. (1985). The power plant: Teachers' guide. East Lansing, MI: The Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
26. Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 897-930.
27. Schnieder, R., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 410-422.
28. Seiler, G., Tobin, K., & Sokolic, J. (2001). Design, technology, and science: Sites for learning, resistance, and social reproduction in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 746-768.
29. Smith, G. (1992). Education and the Environment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
30. Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Tilgner, P. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74(4), 21-42.