Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes

Psychological Research

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 167-178

  Rubichi, Sandro ^a   Nicoletti, Roberto ^b   Umiltà, Carlo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; ITALY; LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; ITALY; OVERLEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 12144266520     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0168-z     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
2. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
3. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439.
4. Heuer H. (1990). Rapid responses with the left or right hand: Response-response compatibility effects due to intermanual interactions. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility. An integrated perspective (pp. 311-342). Amsterdam: North-Holland
5. Heuer, H. (1993). Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychological Research, 55, 83-98.
6. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
7. Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 102-110.
8. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (Eds.), (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
10. Lamberts, K., Tavernier, G., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1992). Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 79, 115-130.
11. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
12. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 333-343.
13. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: The right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 211-216.
14. Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., Tressoldi, E. P., & Marzi, C. A. (1988). Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones? Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 287-292.
15. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1985). Compatibility effects in the assignments of symbolic stimuli to discrete finger response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 623-639.
16. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.), (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17. Proctor, R. W., Vu, K. P., & Nicoletti, R. (2003). The Simon effect for two-dimensional spatial stimulus-response sets. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1318-1329.
18. Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological Research, 59, 196-211.
19. Rubichi, S., Pelosi, A., Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (in press). Right-left prevalence effect with horizontal and vertical effectors. Perception & Psychophysics
20. Simon, J. R, & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
21. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 648-670.
22. Umiltà, C., & Liotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 81-90.
23. Vu, K. P., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of the right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 813-828.
24. Vu, K. P., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 815-828.
25. Vu, K. P., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2000). Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses. Psychological Research, 64, 25-40.