Protein fold recognition using neural networks and support vector machines

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3578, Issue , 2005, Pages 462-469

  Jiang, Nan ^a   Wu, Wendy Xinyu ^a   Mitchell, Ian ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; POTENTIAL ENERGY;

FOLD RECOGNITION MODEL; SUBSTITUTION MAPPING; VECTOR MACHINES;

PROTEINS;

EID: 26444620063     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11508069_60     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J. G.: Amino-acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 89(22): 10915-10919. (1992)
2. Shi, J., Blundell, T. L. and Mizuguchi, K.: FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J. Mol Biol., 310:243-257. (2001)
3. Kelley, L. A., MacCallum, R. M. and Sternberg, M. J.: Enhanced Genome Annotation using Structural Profiles in the Program 3D-PSSM. J. Mol. Biol., 299(2): 501-522. (2000)
4. Baldi, P. and Brunak, S: Bioinformaics: The Machine Learning Approach, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (2001)
5. Wang, L.P. (Ed.), Support Vector Machines: Theory and Application. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2005)
6. Ding, C. and Dubchak, I.: Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics, 17:349-358. (2001)
7. Bologna, G., Appel, R.D.: A comparison study on protein fold recognition. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP '02) Vol.5 2492-2496. (2002)
8. Jiang, N., Wu, X. and Mitchell, I.: Protein threading with residue-environment matching by artificial neural networks. Proceeding of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 209. (2004)
9. Lo Conte, L., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T. J. P. et al.: SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucl. Acids. Res., 30(1): 264-267. (2002)
10. Shih, E. S. C. and Hwang, M. J.: Protein structure comparison by probability-based matching of secondary structure elements. Bioinformatics, 19:735-741. (2003)
11. Fischer, D., Elofsson, A., Rice, D. W. et al.: Assessing the performance of fold recognition methods by means of a comprehensive benchmark. Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 300-318. (1996)
12. Bryant, S.H. and Altschul, S.F.: Statistics of sequence-structure threading. Current Opinions in Structural Biology, 5, 236-244. (1995)
13. Jones, D. T.: GenTHREADER: An efficient and Reliable Protein Fold recognition Method for Genomic Sequences. J. Mol. Biol., 287:797-815. (1999)
14. Xu, Y., Xu, D. and Olman, V.: A practical method for interpretation of threading scores: an application of neural networks. Statistical Sinica Special Issue on Bioinformatics, 12, 159-177.(2002)
15. Zhou, H. and Zhou, Y.: Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition. Proteins, 55:1005-1013. (2004)
16. Wallner, B. Fang, H. Ohlson, T. Frey-skott, J. and Elofsson, A.: Using evolutionary information for query and target improves fold recognition. Proteins, 54:342-350. (2004)