Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in neonates and infants: From bench to clinical practice

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2005, Pages

  Ündar, Akif ^a,b  

^a PENN STATE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; BASAL GANGLION; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN METABOLISM; BRAIN OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN VASCULAR RESISTANCE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEART LUNG MACHINE; HEMODYNAMICS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MORBIDITY; NEWBORN;

ANIMALS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; ENERGY METABOLISM; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; OXYGENATORS; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 26444529017     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000178215.34588.98     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Allen SW, Gauvreau K, Bloom B, et al: Evidence based referral results in significantly reduced mortality after congenital heart surgery. Pediatrics 24: 103-108, 2003.
2. Jenkins KJ: Risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery: The RACHS-1 method. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 7: 180-184, 2004.
3. Volpe JJ: Brain injury and infant cardiac surgery: Overview, in Jonas RA, Newburger JW, Volpe JJ (eds), Brain Injury and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Newton, MA, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996, pp. 1-10.
4. Westone R, Campbell JM, Booker PD, McKay R: Renal function after cardiopulmonary bypass in children: Comparison of dopamine with dobutamine. Br J Anesth 67: 591-594, 1991.
5. McAuliffe JJ: Myocardial presentation, in Lake CL (ed), Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia, Stamford, CT, Appleton & Lange, 1997, pp. 259-284.
6. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Clubb FJ Jr, et al: Novel anti-factor d monoclonal antibody inhibits complement and leukocyte activation in a baboon model of cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 74: 355-362, 2002.
7. Langley SM, Chai PJ, Jaggers JJ, et al: Preoperative high dose methylprednisolone attenuates the cerebral response to deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17: 279-286, 2000.
8. Hanley F: Regional low-flow perfusion provides cerebral circulatory support during neonatal aortic arch reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119: 337-338, 2000.
9. Ungerleider R: Practice patterns in neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 7: 172-179, 2004.
10. Bellinger DC, Wypij D, du Plessis AJ, et al: Neurodevelopmental status at eight years in children with transposition of the great arteries: The Boston circulatory arrest trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126: 1385-1396, 2003.
11. Ündar A, Masai T, Yang SQ, et al: Pulsatile perfusion improves regional myocardial blood flow during and after hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in a neonatal piglet model. ASAIO J 48: 90-95, 2002.
12. Ündar A, Masai T, Yang SQ, et al: Effects of perfusion mode on regional and global organ blood flow in a neonatal piglet model. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 1336-1343, 1999.
13. Ündar A: Design and performance of physiologic pulsatile flow cardiopulmonary bypass systems for neonates and infants [PhD dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin, TX, May 1996.
14. Ündar A, Lodge AJ, Daggett CW, et al: The type of aortic cannula and membrane oxygenator affects the pulsatile waveform morphology produced by a neonate-infant cardiopulmonary bypass system in vivo. Artif Organs 22: 681-686, 1998.
15. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, et al: Comparison of six pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass pumps during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 122: 827-829, 2001.
16. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Bigley JE, et al: Effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion on cerebral hemodynamics investigated using a new pediatric pump. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124: 413-416, 2002.
17. Ündar A, Vaughn WK, Calhoon JH: Effects of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow on cerebral hemodynamics during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol 23: 000-4, 2001.
18. Ündar A: The ABCs of research on pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass [editorial]. Med Sci Monif 8: ED21-ED24, 2002.
19. Ündar A: Myths and truths of pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion during acute and chronic cardiac support [editorial]. Artif Organs 28: 439-443, 2004.
20. Ündar A: Principles and practices of pulsatile perfusion in pediatric and adult open-heart surgery. Turk J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 12: 215-219, 2004.
21. Ündar A, Rosenberg G, Myers JL: Majors factors in the controversy of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow during acute and chronic cardiac support [editorial]. ASAIO J 51: 173-175, 2005.
22. Ündar A: Benefits of pulsatile flow during and after cardiopulmonary bypass procedures [editorial]. Artif Organs 29: 687-689, 2005.
23. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF: Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 93: 730-740, 1966.
24. Wright G: Hemodynamic analysis could resolve the pulsatile blood flow controversy. Ann Thorac Surg 58: 1199-204, 1994.
25. Ündar A, Masai T, Frazier OH, Fraser Jr CD: Pulsatile and nonpulsatile flows can be quantified in terms of energy equivalent pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass for direct comparisons. ASAIO J 45: 610-614, 1999.
26. Ündar A, Frazier OH, Fraser CD Jr: Defining pulsatile perfusion: Quantification in terms of energy equivalent pressure. Artif Organs 23: 712-716, 1999.
27. Weiss WJ, Lukic B, Ündar A: Energy equivalent pressure and total hemodynamic energy associated with the pressure-flow wave-forms of a pediatric pulsatile VAD. ASAIO J 51: 614-617, 2005.
28. Kim HK, Son HS, Fang YH, et al: The effects of pulsatile flow upon renal tissue perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: A comparative study of pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow. ASAIO J 51: 30-36, 2005.
29. Gu YJ, Dekroon TL, Elstrodt JM, et al: Augmentation of abdominal organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass with a novel intra-aortic pulsatile catheter pump. Int J Artif Organs 28: 35-43, 2005.
30. Ündar A, Zapanta CM, Reibson JD, et al: Precise quantification of pressure-flow waveforms of a pulsatile VAD during chronic support. ASAIO J 51: 56-59, 2005.
31. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, et al: Precise quantification of pulsatility is a necessity for direct comparisons of six different pediatric heart-lung machines in a neonatal CPB model. ASAIO J 51: 600-603, 2005.
32. Gourlay T, Gibbons M, Taylor KM: Pulsatile flow compatibility of a group of membrane oxygenators. Perfusion 2: 115-126, 1987.
33. Ündar A, Koenig KM, Frazier OH, Fraser CD: Impact of membrane oxygenators on pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion in a neonatal model. Perfusion 15: 111-120, 2000.
34. Dubois J, Jamaer L, Mees U, et al: Ex vivo evaluation of a new neonatal/infant oxygenator: Comparison of the Terumo Capiox Baby RX with Dideco Lilliput 1 and Polystan Safe Micro in the piglet model. Perfusion 219: 315-321, 2004.
35. Ündar A, Owens WR, McGarry M, et al: Comparison of hollow fiber membrane oxygenators in terms of pressure drop of the membranes during normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in neonates. Perfusion 20: 135-138, 2005.
36. Yasui H, Yonenaga K, Kado H: Open-heart surgery in infants using pulsatile high-flow cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 30: 661-668, 1989.
37. Fumero R, Montevecchi FM, Scuri S, et al: Clinical experience with a new pulsatile pump for infant and pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Int J Artif Organs 12: 314-320, 1989.
38. Williams GD, Seifen AB, Lawson NW, et al: Pulsatile perfusion versus conventional high-flow non-pulsatile perfusion for rapid core cooling and rewarming of infants for circulatory arrest in cardiac operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78: 667-677, 1979.
39. Sezai A, Shiono M, Nakata K, et al: Effects of pulsatile CPB on interleukin-8 and endothelin-1 levels. Artif Organs 2005 [in press].
40. Nakamura K, Harasaki H, Fukumura F, et al: Comparison of pulsatile and non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass on regional renal blood flow in sheep. Scand Cardiovasc J 38: 000-5, 2004.
41. Herreros J, Berjano EJ, Sola J, et al: Injury in organs after cardiopulmonary bypass: A comparative experimental morphological study between a centrifugal and a new pulsatile pump. Artif Organs 28: 738-742, 2004.
42. Orime Y, Shiono M, Hata H, et al: Cytokine and endothelial damage in pulsatile and non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs 23: 508-512, 1999.
43. Herreros J, Berjano EJ, Mas P, et al: Platelet dysfunction in cardiopulmonary bypass: An experimental comparative study between a centrifugal and a new pulsatile pump. Int J Artif Organs 26: 1086-1094, 2003.