Microtensile bond strength of two resin composite materials placed with direct and indirect techniques under simulated pulpal pressure

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 197-202

  Sengun, Abdulkadir ^a   Ünlü, Nimet ^a   Ozturk, Bora ^a   Özer, Füsun ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Direct posterior composite; Indirect inlay; Microtensile bond strength; Pulpal pressure

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL AP X; CLEARFIL AP-X; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK Z250; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; METHACRYLATES; MOLAR; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 26444478196     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Biederman JD. Direct composite resin inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:249-253.
2. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;45:849-853.
3. Burke EJT, Qualtrough AJE. Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic? Br Dent J 1993;176:53-60.
4. Burke FJ, Watts DC, Wilson NH, Wilson MA. Current status and rationale for composite inlays and onlays. Br Dent J 1991;170:269-273.
5. Cassin AM, Pearson GJ. Microleakage studies comparing a one-visit indirect composite inlay system and a direct composite restorative technique. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:265-270.
6. Chang JC, Nguyen T, Duong JH, Ladd GD. Tensile bond strengths of dual-cured cements between a glass-ceramic and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:503-507.
7. Ciucchi B, Bouillaquet S, Holz J, Pashley D. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endodon 1995;21:191-194.
8. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999;24:147-155.
9. Gökalp S, Kiremitci A. Dentin adhesives: 2000. H U J Dent 2001;25:44-51.
10. Görücü J. Fracture resistance of class II preformed ceramic insert and direct composite resin restorations. J Dent 2003;31:83-88.
11. Gregory WA, Berry S, Duke E. Dennison JB. Physical properties and repair bond strength of direct and indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:406-411.
12. Hasanreisoglu U, Sonmez H, Uctasli S, Wilson HJ. Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:66-71.
13. Hummel SK, Marker V, Pace L, Goldfogel M. Surface treatment of indirect resin composite surfaces before cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:568-572.
14. Irie M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements: marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2001;17:347-353.
15. Kramer IR, Mclean JW. Alteration in the staining of dentine resulting from a constituent of a new self polymerizing resin. Br Dent J 1952;93:150-153.
16. Kreulen CM, Van Amerongen WE, Akerboom HB, Borgmeijer PJ, Gruythuysen RJ. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations. ASDC J Dent Child 1993a;60:310-314.
17. Kreulen CM, Van Amerongen WE, Gruythuysen RJ, Borgmeijer PJ, Akerboom HB. Prevalence of postoperative sensitivity with indirect Class II resin composite inlays. ASDC J Dent Child 1993b;60:95-98.
18. Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Herteanu L, Judes H. Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:26-29.
19. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM, Williams DF. Cuspal deflection during polymerisation of composite lutes of ceramic inlays. J Dent 1999;27:29-36.
20. Matos AB, Kuramoto M, John M. Bond strength of a resin-based composite to leucite-reinforced ceramic and dentin. J Dent Res 1999;12:113-115.
21. Michelini FS, Belser UC, Scherrer SS, De Rijk WG. Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:324-331.
22. Öilo G, Olsson S. Tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives: A comparison of materials and methods. Dent Mater 1990;6:138-144.
23. Paul SJ, Schärer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:8-14.
24. Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;15:46-53.
25. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1998;14:212-221.
26. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Manhart J, Kremers L, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:391-397.
27. Scott JA, Strang R, Saunders WP. The plane of fracture and shear bond strength of three composite inlay systems. Dent Mater 1992;8:208-210.
28. Şengün A, Öztürk B, Özer F. The effect of simulated intrapulpal pressure on bond strength to enamel and dentin. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:550-555.
29. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999;78:699-705.
30. Shono Y, Terashita M. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bond strength - a trial of new version of micro-tensile test method. In: Momoi Y, Akimoto N, Kohno A (eds). Modern trends in adhesive dentistry proceedings of the adhesive dentistry forum'99 in Tsurumi, Yokohoma, Japan. Kuraray Co., Ltd, Japan, 1999:75-84.
31. Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Wilson HJ. Composite inlay/luting resin bond strength-surface treatment effects. J Dent 1996;24:129-135.
32. Suzuki T, Finger WJ. Dentin adhesives: Site of dentin vs. bonding of composite resins. Dent Mater 1988;4:379-383.
33. Tate WH, DeSchepper EJ, Powers JM. Bond strength of resin cements to a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 1993;6:195-198.
34. Terata R, Nakashima K, Obara M, Kubota M. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement-effect of temporary cement on tensile bond strength of resin luting cement. Dent Mater 1994;13:148-154.
35. Terata R, Yoshinaka S, Nakashima K, Kubota M. Effect of resinous temporary material on tensile bond strength of resin luting cement to tooth substrate. Dent Mater 1996;15:45-50.
36. Tjan AH, Castelnuovo J, Liu P. Bond strength of multi-step and simplified-step systems. Am J Dent 1996;9:269-72.
37. Uctasli S, Wilson HJ, Zaimoglu L. Variables affecting the fracture toughness of resin-based inlay/onlay systems. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:423-431.
38. Van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
39. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: three-year clinical results. Br Dent J 1995;179:343-349.
40. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:375-382.
41. Wiltshire WA, Ferreira MR, Nel JC, Van Wyk PJ. Tensile bond strengths of resin luting cements for resin-bonded bridges to etched enamel. Dent Mater 1987;3:56-59.
42. Woody TL, Davis RD. The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper Dent 1992;17:175-180.
43. Ziskind D, Elbaz B, Hirschfeld Z, Rosen L. Amalgam alternatives- microleakage evaluation of clinical procedures. Part II: direct/indirect composite inlay systems. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:502-506.
44. Zuellig-Singer R, Krejci I. Lutz F. Effects of cement-curing modes on dentin bonding of inlays. J Dent Res 1992;71:1842-1846.