Amalgam alternatives - Microleakage evaluation of clinical procedures. Part II: Direct/indirect composite inlay systems

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 502-506

  Ziskind, D ^a   Elbaz, B ^a   Hirschfeld, Z ^a   Rosen, L ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLORING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FUCHSINE; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; TOOTH DISEASE;

COLORING AGENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); ROSANILINE DYES;

EID: 0032109929     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00272.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. DOUGLAS, W.H., FIELDS, R.P. & FUNDINSLAND, J. (1989) The comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. Journal of Dentistry, 17, 184.
2. HASANREISOGLU, U., SONMEY, H., UCTASLI, S. & WILSON, H.J. (1996) Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 23, 66.
3. HASEGAWA, E.A., BOYER, D.B. & CHAN, D.C.N. (1989) Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. Dental Materials, 5, 388.
4. KANCA, J. III (1989) The effect of heat on the surface hardness of light-activated composite resins. Quintessence International, 20, 899.
5. KREJCI, I., LUTZ, F. & GAUTSCHI, L. (1994) Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 72, 233.
6. LUTZ, F., KREJCI, I. & BARBAKOW, F. (1991) Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dental Materials, 7, 107.
7. PEUTZFELDT, E. & ASMUSSEN, E. (1990) A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay onlay techniques. Operative Dentistry, 15, 129.
8. ROBINSON, P.B., MOORE, B.K. & SWARTZ, M.L. (1987) Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro. Operative Dentistry, 12, 113.
9. RUYTER, I.E. (1985) Monomer systems and polymerization in posterior composite resin dental restoration materials. In: Dental Restorative Materials (eds G. Vanherle & D.C. Smith), pp. 109-135. Peter Szulc Publication Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
10. SHORTAL, A.C., BAYLIS, R.L., BAYLIS, M.A. & GRUNDY, J.R. (1989) Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2, 217.
11. VAN MEERBEEK, B., PEUMANS, M., VERSCHUEREN, S., GLADYS, S., BRAEM, M., LAMBRECHTS, P. & VANHERELE, G. (1994) Clinical status of ten dentine adhesive systems. Journal of Dental Research, 73, 1690.
12. WENDT, S.L. (1989) Time as a factor in the heat curing of composite resins. Quintessence International, 20, 259.
13. ZISKIND, D., AVIVI-ARBER, L., HARAMATI, O.I. & HIRSCHFELD, Z. (1998) Amalgam alternatives - microleakage evaluation of clinical procedures. Part I: direct composite/composite inlay/ceramic inlay. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, (in press).