Movement-based compatibility in simple response tasks

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 695-707

  Bosbach, Simone ^b,c   Prinz, Wolfgang ^b   Kerzel, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b Department of Psychology Cognition and Action ^*

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 26244466527     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440540000086     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bashore, T. R. (1981). Vocal and manual reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Psychological Bulletin, 89(3), 352-368.
2. Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Kerzel, D. (2004). A Simon-effect with stationary moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(1), 39-55.
3. Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Kerzel, D. (2005). Is direction position? Position- and direction-based compatibility effects in tasks with moving stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A(3), 467-506.
4. Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106, 3-22.
5. Greenwald, A. G. (1970a). A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(1), 20-25.
6. Greenwald, A. G. (1970b). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
7. Greenwald, A. G. (1972). On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94(1), 52-57.
8. Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(3), 546-571.
9. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. Hommel, B. (1998). Perceiving one's own action-and what it leads to. In J. S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems theories and a priori aspects of perception (pp. 143-179). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849-878.
12. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 256(5449), 2526-2528.
13. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., & Mazziotta, J. C. (1996). Brain-behavior relationships: Evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76(1), 321-331.
14. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
15. Knuf, L., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). An analysis of ideomotor action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 779-798.
16. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for S-R compatibility-A model and a taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
17. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2(2), 174-207.
18. Marzi, C. A., Bisiacchi, P., & Nicoletti, R. (1991). Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 29(12), 1163-1177.
19. Prinz, W. (1987). Ideomotor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167-201). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
21. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129-154.
22. Prinz, W. (2002). Experimental approaches to imitation. In A. N. Meltzhoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 143-162). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Prinz, W., de Maeght, S., & Knuf, L. (2005). Intention in action. In G. Humphreys & J. Riddoch (Eds.), Attention in action: Advances from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 93-107). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
24. Proctor, R. W., Wang, H., & Vu, K. P. (2002). Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A(1), 55-74.
25. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (2000). Response strategies and the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 63, 129-136.
26. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
28. Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88(3), 354-360.