Language Awareness and its multiple possibilities for the L2 classroom

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 96-110

  Simard, Daphnée ^a   Wong, Wynne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26244455752     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02177.x     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
2. Berthoud, A. C. (1982). Activité métalinguistique et acquisition d'une langue second [Metalinguistic activity and second language acquisition]. Berne: Lang.
3. Besse, H. (1980). Communicatif et cognitif dans l'apprentissage de la grammaire d'une langue étrangère [Communicative and cognitive aspects of learning the grammar of a foreign language]. AQEFLS, 11(2), 5-23.
4. Besse, H. (1986). Enseignement/apprentissage des langues étrangères et connaissances grammaticales et linguistiques [Teaching/learning foreign languages and grammatical knowledge and linguistics]. Les langues modernes, 80, 19-34.
5. Bonnet, C, & Tamine-Garde, J. (1984). Quand I'enfant park du langage: Connaissances et conscience du langage chez I'enfant [When the child talks about language: Knowledge and consciousness of language among children]. Bruxelles: Pierre Margada.
6. Bourguignon, C, & Candelier, M. (1984). Réflexion guidée sur la langue maternelle et apprentissage d'une langue étrangère. Compte rendu d'une expérimentation. [Guided reflexion on the L1 and learning of an L2. A review of an experiment.] Les langues modernes, 78, 147-65.
7. Bourguignon, C, & Candelier, M. (1988). La place de la langue maternelle dans la construction par l'élève des notions grammaticales requises pour l'apprentissage d'une langue étrangè re. Compte rendu d'une experimentation. [The place of the L1 in the construction of grammatical knowledge by the student for learning an L2. A review of an experiment.] Les langues modernes, 82,19-34.
8. Bourguignon, C, & Dabène, L. (1982). Le métalangage, un point de rencontre obligé entre professeur de langue maternelle et de langue étrangère [Metalanguage, an obligatory meeting point between L1 and L2 instructors]. Lefrançais dans le monde, 45-9.
9. Bourguignon, C, & Pouchol, O. (1979). Passage de la langue maternelle à la langue étrangère: Étude expérimentale. [Moving from the L1 to the L2. Experimental study.] Études de Iingtiistique appliquée, 34, 69-85.
10. Bullock, A. (Chairman) (1975). A Language for Life: Report of the Committee of Inquiry Appointed by the Secretary of the State for Education and Science. HMSO, United Kingdom.
11. Candelier, M. (1986). La réflexion sur la langue d'où vient-elle et qu'en ferons-nous? [Reflection on language: Where is it from and what are we doing with it?] Les langues modernes, 80, 59-74.
12. Candelier, M. (1992). Language awareness and language policy in the European context: A French point of view. Language Awareness, 1, 27-31.
13. Candelier, M. (1998). L'Éveil aux langues à lécole primaire le programme européen EVlang [Language awareness in primary school: The European EVlang program.] In L. Dabène (Ed.), De la didactique des langues à la didactique du plurilinguisme. Hommage à Louise Dabène [From the didactics of language to the didactics of pluralingualism]. Grenoble, France: CDLLIDILEM
14. Candelier, M. (1999). Entretien entre Michel CANDELIER et DiversCité Langues. DiversCité Langues [Interview with Michel CANDELIER and DiversCite Langues]. [Online]. Available:http://www.teluq.uquebec. ca/diverscite/SecEntre/99/mcandelier/ mcandelier-ftdm.htm.
15. Candelier, M. (2000). Le programme EVlang: Présentation général des objectifs [The EVlang program: General presentation of objectives]. Paper presented at the meeting of La Fédération Internationale des Professeurs de Langues Vivantes, Paris, France.
16. Dabène, L. (1986). Langue maternelle, langue étrangè re, quelques réflexions [L1, L2, some reflections]. Les langues modernes, 1, 91-7.
17. Dabène, L. (1990). L'Éveil au langage: Compte-rendu d'une expérience en cours [Language awareness: Review of an experiment in progress]. Les langues vivantes a I'élémentaire. Actes du colloque, juin.
18. Dabène, L. (1992). Le développement de la conscience métalinguistique: un objectif commun pour l'enseignement de la langue maternelle et des langues étrangères [The development of metalinguistic awareness: A common objective for the teaching of L1s and L2s]. Repères, 6, 13-23.
19. Dabène, L. (1995). L'éveil au langage: Itinéraire et problématique. L'éveil au langage: Notions en questions. [Language awareness: Itinerary and thesis. Language awareness: Notions in question.] Rencontre en didactique des langues, 1, juin, 135-44. .
20. Dabène, L. (1996). Pour une contrastivité "revisitée." [For a contrastivity revised.] Études de Iinguistique appliquée, 103, 393-400.
21. Dabène, L., & Bourguignon, C. (1982). Le métalangage, un point de rencontre obligé entre professeur de langue maternelle et de langue étrangère. [Metalanguage, an obligatory meeting point between L1 and L2 instructors.] Lefrançais dans le monde, 177,45-9.
22. De Graaff, R. (1997). The Experanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(2), 249-76.
23. Donmall, G. B. (1985). Some implications of language awareness work for teacher training (pre-service and in-service). In G.B. Donmall (Ed.), Language Awareness, National Congress on Language in Education, Papers and Reports 6. London: Center for Information on Language Teaching.
24. Doughty, C, & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Errors and strategies in child second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 129-36.
26. Ellis, R. (1991). Second language acquistion and language pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
27. Ellis, R. (1993). Interpretation-based grammar teaching. System, 21, 69-78.
28. Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605-28.
29. Fotos, S. (1993). Consciousness-raising through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction. Applied Linguistics, 14,385-407.
30. Gnutzmann, C. (1997). Language awareness: Progress in language learning and language education, or reformulation of old ideas? Language Awareness, 6, 65-74.
31. Gombert, J. E. (1996). Activités métalinguistiques et acquisition d'une langue [Metalinguistic activities and acquisition of a language]. AILE, 8, 41-55.
32. Halliday, M. A. K. (1971). Language in use. In P. Doughty, J. Pearce, & G. Thornton (Eds.), Schools council programme in linguistics and English teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
33. Harley, B. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 245-59.
34. Harley, B., & Swain, M. (1985). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A.PR. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 291-311). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
35. Hawkins, E. (1984). Language awareness: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Hawkins, E. (1987). Modern language in the curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hawkins, E. (1999). Foreign language study and language awareness. Language Awareness, 8, 124-42.
38. Herman, R. L., & Olson Flanigan, B. (1995). Adding grammar in a communicatively based ESL program for children: Theory and practice. TESL Canada Journal, 13, 1-17.
39. Huot, D. (1995). Observer l'attention. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Explicit and implicit processes in foreign language acquisition (pp. 85-126). Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
40. James, C. (1980). Contrastive analysis. New York: Longman.
41. Kevran, M., & Techer, L. (2000, July). Construire line compe´tence d'analyse du fonctionnement de langue non familières avec les supports didactiques EVlang. [Constructing a competence of analysis of the functioning of nonfamiliar languages with the didactic supports of EVlang.] Paper presented at la fédération internationale des professeurs de langues vivantes, Paris, France.
42. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Fairview Park, OH: Pergamon Press.
43. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.
44. Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw Hill.
45. Luc, C. (1995). Quelle pertinence à la notion de Language Awareness pour un enseignement d'initiation à une autre langue étrangére en France, quels contenus? Léveil au langage. [What pertinence does the notion of Language Awareness have for initiating the teaching of another L2 in France, what are the contents?] Notions en questions: Rencontres en didactique des langues, 1, juin, 51-83.
46. Leow, R. (1998). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners' L2 development in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 49-68.
47. Milon.J. P (1974). The development of negation in English by a second language learner. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 137-43.
48. Norris,J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
49. Perregaux, C. (1998). Avec les approches d'éveil au langage, l'intercultural est au centre de l'apprentissage scolaire? [With the approach of Language Awareness, is the intercultural at the center of scholastic learning?] Bulletin Suisse de Iinguistiqtie appliquée, 7, 101-10.
50. Perregaux, C. (2000). Les approaches didactiques Eveil au langage/Ouverture aux langues B l'école (EOLE) en Suisse romande. [The Language Awareness didactic approaches/opening of language schools in Switzerland.] Paper presented at the meeting of la fédération internationale des professeurs de langues vivantes, Paris, France.
51. Piaget, J. (1948). Le langage et la pensee chez I'enfant. [Language and thought among children.] Neuchâtel, Suisse: Delachaux & Niestlé.
52. Piaget, J. (1974). La prise de conscience. [Awareness.] Paris: P.U.F
53. Rampton, A. (Chairman) (1981). West Indian Children in our Schools. Interim Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Education of Children from Ethnic Minority Groups. HMSO, United Kingdom.
54. Redard, F (1977). La prise de conscience du système phonologique par des enfants francophones en milieu scolaire. [Awareness of the phonological system by francophone children in schools.] Bulletin CILA, 26, 31-46.
55. Richelle, M. (1971). L'acquisition du langage (3rd ed.) [The acquisition of language.] Bruxelles: Charles Dessart, Éditeur.
56. Robinson, R (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-67.
57. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-56.
58. Roulet, E. (1980). Langue maternelle et langues secondes. Vers une pédagogie intégrée. [First and second languages. Towards an integrated pedagogy.] Poitier: Hatier.
59. Roulet, E. (1983). Langue maternelle et langue étrangères. Vers une pédagogie globale. [First and second languages. Towards an integrated pedagogy.] Le Français dans le monde, 177, 23-6.
60. Roulet, E. (1995). Peut-on intégrer 1'enseignement-apprentissage décalé de plusieurs langues? [Can we integrate the teaching-learning of several languages?] Babylonia, 2, 22-5.
61. Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness raising and universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6, 274-82.
62. Schmidt, R. (1995). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
63. Scott, V. (1989). An empirical study of explicit and implicit teaching strategies in French. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 14-22.
64. Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118-32.
65. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-79.
66. Simard, D. (in press). Using diaries to promote metalingusitic reflection among elementary school students. Language Awareness.
67. Simard, D. (2001). Effet de la mise en evidence textuelle sur I'acquisition de différentes marques du pluriel en anglais L2. [The effect of textual enhancement on the acquisition of different plural markers in English.] Thèse inédite, Université Laval, Canada.
68. Simard, D. (2002, February). Metalinguistic reflection as a way of promoting form-meaning connections in the ESL classroom. Paper presented at the Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition Conference, Chicago.
69. Simard, D. & Wong, W. (1999). La mise en évidence dans la classe de langue seconde. [Input enhancement in the second language classroom.] Workshop presented at the Canadian Association for Applied Linguistics, Sherbrooke, Canada.
70. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 384-95.
73. Trévise, A. (1979). Spécificité de l'énonciation didactique dans l'apprentissage de l'anglais par des étudiants francophones. [The specificity of the didactic statement in the learning of English by francophone students.] Encrages, numéro spécial de Linguistique appliquée, 44-52.
74. Trévise, A. (1993). Acquisition / apprentissage / enseignement d'une langue2: Modes d'observation, modes d'intervention. [Acquisition/learning/ teaching an L2: Modes of observation, modes of intervention.] Revue de I'ACLA, 38-50.
75. Trévise, A. (1994). Activités métalangagières et acquisitionapprentissage des langues. Quelques réflexions à l'issue de la journée sur les journaux de bord. [Metalinguistic activities and acquisition-learning of languages. Some reflections at the end of the day on journals.] In Lesjournaux d'apprenants de langues. Acte de la journée d'étude du 29-11-94. Groupe Jan Comenius, Paris X Nanterre, 21-32.
76. Trévise, A. (1996). Contrastive metalinguistic representations: The case of very French learners of English. Language Awareness, 5, 189-95.
77. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
78. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-43.
79. VanPatten, B., & Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction and the faire causatif in French: A replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 97-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80. White, L. (1977). Error analysis and error correction in adult learners of English as a second language. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 13,42-58.
81. Wong, W. (2002). Linking form and meaning: Processing instruction. The French Review, 76, 236-64.