Modulation of the vertical Simon effect in two-dimensional tasks: The effect of learning

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 686-694

  Rubichi, Sandro ^a   Gherri, Elena ^a   Nicoletti, Roberta ^b   Umiltà, Carlo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 26244445172     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440540000040     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
2. Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 102-110.
3. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (Eds.). (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
4. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
5. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 174-207.
6. Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2005). Attention, instruction, and response representation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 674-685.
7. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 333-343.
8. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: The right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 211-216.
9. Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., Tressoldi, E. P., & Marzi, C. A. (1988). Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones? Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 287-292.
10. Proctor, R. W., & Lu, C. H. (1999). Processing irrelevant location information: Practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks. Memory and Cognition, 27, 63-77.
11. Proctor, R. W., Vu, K. P., & Nicoletti, R. (2003). Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect? Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 1318-1329.
12. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Pelosi, A., & Umiltà, C. (2004). Right-left prevalence effect with horizontal and vertical effectors. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 255-263.
13. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Right-left prevalence effect with task irrelevant spatial codes. Psychological Research, 69, 167-178.
14. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
15. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648-670.
16. Vu, K. P., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of the right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 813-828.
17. Vu, K. P., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 815-828.
18. Vu, K. P., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2000). Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: Right-left prevalence with bimanual responses. Psychological Research, 64, 25-40.