Right-left prevalence effect with horizontal and vertical effectors

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 255-263

  Rubichi, Sandro ^a   Nicoletti, Roberto ^b   Pelosi, Annalisa ^c   Umiltà, Carlo ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PREVALENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELD;

HUMANS; PREVALENCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 2442670740     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194877     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. DE JONG, R., LIANG, C.-C., & LAUBER, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731-750.
2. HOMMEL, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 102-110.
3. HOMMEL, B., & PRINZ, W. (EDS.) (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
4. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
5. LU, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
6. NICOLETTI, R., & UMILTÀ, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 333-343.
7. NICOLETTI, R., & UMILTÀ, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 211-216.
8. NICOLETTI, R., UMILTÀ, C., TRESSOLDI, E. P., & MARZI, C. A. (1988). Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones? Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 287-292.
9. PROCTOR, R. W., & REEVE, T. G. (1985). Compatibility effects in the assignments of symbolic stimuli to discrete finger response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 623-639.
10. PROCTOR, R. W., & REEVE, T. G. (EDS.) (1990). Stimulus response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. PROCTOR, R. W., VU, K.-P. L., & NICOLETTI, R. (2003). Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect? Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1318-1329.
12. RATCLIFF, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
13. RUBICHI, S., NICOLETTI, R., IANI, C., & UMILTÀ, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1353-1364.
14. RUBICHI, S., NICOLETTI, R., & UMILTÀ, C. (in press). Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes. Psychological Research.
15. SIMON, J. R., & RUDELL, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
16. TAGLIABUE, M., ZORZI, M., UMILTÀ, C., & BASSIGNANI, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 648-670.
17. VU, K.-P. L., & PROCTOR, R. W. (2001). Determinants of the right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 813-828.
18. VU, K.-P. L., & PROCTOR, R. W. (2002). The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 815-828.
19. VU, K.-P. L., PROCTOR, R. W., & PICK, D. F. (2000). Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: Right-left prevalence with bimanual responses. Psychological Research, 64, 25-40.