Review of Multilevel Modeling and Multilevel Studies in The Journal of Educational Research (1992-2002)

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 24-34

  Schreiber, James B ^a   Griffin, Bryan W ^b  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Multilevel modeling studies; The Journal of Educational Research, years 1992 2002

Indexed keywords

EID: 25844489172     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOER.98.1.24-34     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regres-sion/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
4. Hox, J. (1995). Applied multilevel analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties. [Available at no cost] Retrieved July 6, 2004, from http://multilevel. ioe.ac.uk/intro/amabook.pdf
5. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Kreft, I.G.G. (1995). The effects of centering in multilevel analysis: Is the public school the loser or the winner? A new analysis of an old question. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter, 7(3), 5-8.
7. Kreft, I. G. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
8. Kreft, I. G. G., de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1-22.
9. Longford, N. T. (1989). To center or not to center. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter, 1(3), 7-8, 11.
10. Longford, N. T. (1993a). Random coefficient models. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
11. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace.
12. Plewis, I. (1989). Comment of centering predictors. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter, 1 (3), 6, 11.
13. Plewis, I. (1990). Centering: A postscript? Comment of centering predictors. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter, 2(1), 8.
14. Raudenbush, S. (1989a). Centering predictors in multilevel analysis: Choices and consequences. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter, 1(2), 10-12.
15. Raudenbush, S. (1989b). A response to Longford and Plewis. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter, 1(3), 8-10.
16. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
17. SPSS. (1999). SPSS Base 10.0 application guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
18. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1990). National Education Longitudinal Study, 1988. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
19. Caldas, S. J., & Bankston, C. L. (1999). Multilevel examination of student, school, and district-level effects on academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 91-100.
20. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W D., & Huang, Chun-Wei. (2001). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the NAEP. The Journal of Educational Research, 94, 145-162.
21. Kennedy, E. (1992). A multilevel study of elementary male Black students and White students. The Journal of Educational Research, 86, 105-110.
22. McMillian, B. J. (2001). A statewide evaluation of academic achievement in year-round schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 67-74.
23. Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2001). Are the effects of small classes cumulative? Evidence from a Tennessee experiment. The Journal of Educational Research, 94, 336-345.
24. Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on advanced mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 274-286.
25. von Secker, C. (2002). Effects of inquiry-based teacher practices on science excellence and equity. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 151-160.
26. Wang, J., & Goldschmidt, P. (1999). Opportunity to learn, language proficiency, and immigrant status effects on mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 101-111.
27. Wilkins, J. L. M., & Ma, X. (2002). Predicting student growth in mathematics content knowledge. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 288-298.
28. Young, D. J., Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1996). Science achievement and educational productivity: A hierarchical linear model. The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 272-278.
29. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, S. W., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, Jr., R. T. (2000). HLM5 hierarchical and nonlinear modeling [Computer software]. Lin-colnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. Retrieved July 6, 2004, from http://www.ssicentral.com/hlm/hlm.htm
30. Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D., du Toit, S., & du Toit, M. (1999). LISREL 8: New statistical features [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
31. Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., & Wood-house, G., et al. (2000). A user’s guide to MLwiN (2nd ed.). London: Institute of Education. Retrieved July 6, 2004, from http://multilevel. ioe.ac.uk/index.html
32. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998). Mplus, The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers: User' guide. Los Angeles: Authors. Retrieved July 6, 2004, from http://www.statmodel.com
33. Stata Corporation. (2003). Stata user's guide: Release 8. College Station, TX: Stata Press. Retrieved July 6, 2004, from http://www.stata.com (Users of Stata will need to add the free gllamm programs to estimate multilevel models. These programs and their manuals can be downloaded from http://www.gllamm.org)
34. Longford, N. T (1993b). VARCL: Software for variance component analysis of data with nested random effects (maximum likelihood) [Manual]. Groningen: ProGAMMA. Retrieved July 6, 2004, from http://www. assess.com/Software/VARCL.htm