Living with impairment: Learning from disabled young people's biographies

British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 68, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 401-408

  Curtin, Michael ^a   Clarke, Gill ^b  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABLED PERSON; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION; FAMILY LIFE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT MOBILITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 25844470345     PISSN: 03080226     EISSN: 14776006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030802260506800904     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arvay M (2003) Doing reflexivity: a collaborative, narrative approach. In: L Finlay, B Gough, eds. Reflexivity: a practica1guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 163-75.
2. Atkinson D, Walmsley J (1999) Using autobiographical approaches with people with learning difficulties. Disability and Society, 14(2), 203-16.
3. Baker K, Donelly M (2001) The social experiences of children with disability and the influence of environment: a framework for intervention. Disability and Society 16(1), 71-85.
4. Bar-On D (1996) Ethical issues in biographical interviews and analysis. In: R Josselson, ed. Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 9-21.
5. Barnes C (1996) Disability and the myth of the independent researcher. Disability and Society 11(1), 107-10.
6. Bowden S (1995) Development of a research tool to enable children to describe their engagement in occupation. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 2(3), 115-23.
7. Chase S (1996) Personal vulnerability and interpretive authority in narrative research. In: R Josselson, ed. Ethics andprocess in the narrative study of lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 45-59.
8. Coles C, Zsargo L (1998) Conductive education: towards an 'educational model'. British Journal of Special Education, 25(2), 70-74.
9. Connors C, Stalker K (2003) The views and experiences of disabled children and their siblings: a positive outlook. London: Jessica Kingsley.
10. Corker M, Shakespeare T (2002) Mapping the terrain. In: M Corker, T Shakespeare, eds, Disability/postmodernity: embodying disability theory. London: Continuum, 1-17.
11. Curran A, Sharples P, White C, Knapp M (2001) Time costs of caring for children with severe disabilities compared with caring for children without disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 529-33.
12. Curtin M (in press) Using biographical research with disabled young people. In: L Finlay, C Ballinger, B Steward, eds. Qualitative research for health professionals: challenging choices. London: John Wiley.
13. Curtin M, Clarke G (2005) Listening to young people with physical disabilities' experiences of education. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 52(3), 195-214.
14. Davis J (2004) Disability and childhood: deconstructing the stereotypes, In: J Swain, S French, C Barnes, C Thomas, eds. Disabling barriers - enabling environments. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 142-48.
15. Davis J, Watson N (2001) Where are the children's experiences? Analysing social and cultural exclusion in 'special' and 'mainstream' schools. Disability and Society 16(5), 671-87.
16. Davis J, Watson N (2002) Countering stereotypes of disability: disabled children and resistance. In: M Corker, T Shakespeare, eds. Disability/postmodernity: embodying disability theory. London: Continuum, 159-74.
17. Denzin N (1989) Interpretive biography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Dobson B, Middleton S, Beardsworth A (2001) The impact of childhood disability on family life. York: York Publishing Services.
19. Dockrell J, Lewis A, Lindsay G (2000) Researching children's perspectives: a psychological dimension. In: A Lewis, G Lindsay, eds. Researching children's perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press, 46-58.
20. Dowling M, Dolan L (2001) Families with children with disabilities: inequalities and the social model. Disability and Society 16(1), 21-35.
21. Erben M (1998) Biography and research method. In: M Erben, ed. Biography and education: a reader. London: Falmer Press, 4-17.
22. Farrell P (2001) Special education in the last twenty years: have things really got better? British Journal of Special Education, 28(1), 3-9.
23. Frank G (1996) Life histories in occupational therapy clinical practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 50(4), 251-64.
24. French S, Swain J (2004) Whose tragedy? Towards a personal non-tragedy view of disability. In: J Swain, S French, C Barnes, C Thomas, eds. Disabling barriers - enabling environments. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 34-40.
25. Habermas T, Bluck S (2000) Getting a life: the emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 748-69.
26. Kitchin R (2000) The researched opinions on research: disabled people and disability research. Disability and Society 15(1), 25-47.
27. Leicester M, Lovell T (1997) Disability voice: educational experience and disability. Disability and Society 12(1), 111-18.
28. Lewis S, Kagan C, Heaton P (2000) Dual-earner parents with disabled children: family patterns for working and caring. Journal of Family Issues, 21(8), 1031-60.
29. Llewellyn A, Hogan K (2000) The use and abuse of models of disability. Disability and Society 15(1), 157-65.
30. Masson J (2000) Researching children's perspectives: legal issues. in: A Lewis, G Lindsay, eds, Researching children's perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press, 34-45.
31. Masson J (2004) The legal context. In: S Fraser, V Lewis, S Ding, M Kellet, C Robinson, eds. Doing research with children and young people. London: Sage, 43-58.
32. Middleton L (1999) Disabled children: challenging social exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
33. Morris J (1997) Gone missing? Disabled children living away from their families. Disability and Society, 12(2), 241-58.
34. Moston S (1990) How children interpret and respond to questions: situational sources of suggestibility in eyewitness interviews. Social Behaviour 5, 155-67.
35. Murphy R (1995) Encounters: the body silent in America. In: B Instad, S White, eds. Disability and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 140-57.
36. Oliver M (1990) The politics of disablement. London: MacMillan.
37. Oliver M (1996) Understanding disability London: MacMillan.
38. Pollock N, Stewart D, Law M, Sahagian-Whalen S, Harvey S, Toal C (1997) The meaning of play for young people with physical disabilities. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 64(1), 25-31.
39. Preece J (1996) Class and disability: influences on learning expectations. Disability and Sociely 11(2), 191-204.
40. Read J, Clements L (2001) Disabled children and the law: research and good practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.
41. Rieser R (1995) The social model of disability. In: R Rieser, ed. Invisible children: report of the joint conference on children, images and disability. London: Save the Children and The integration Alliance, 55-56.
42. Shakespeare T, Watson N (1997) Defending the social model. Disability and Society 12(2), 293-300.
43. Shakespeare T, Watson N (1998) Theoretical perspectives on research with disabled children. In: C Robinson, K Stalker, eds. Growing up with disability. London: Jessica Kingsley, 13-27.
44. Shakespeare T, Watson N (2002) The social model of disability: an outdated ideology? Research in Social Science and Disability, 2, 9-28.
45. Sparkes A (1994) Life histories and the issue of voice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 7, 165-83.
46. Swain J, French S (2000) Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability and Society 15(4), 569-82.
47. Thomas C (1999) Female forms: experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
48. Thomas C, Corker M (2002) A journey around the social model. In: M Corker, T Shakespeare, eds. Disability/postmodernity: embodying disability theory London: Continuum, 18-31.
49. Wengraf T (2000) Uncovering the general from within the particular: from contingencies to typologies in the understanding of cases. In: P Chamberlayne, J Bornat, T Wengraf, eds. The turn to biographical methods in social science: comparative issues and examples. London: Routledge, 140-64.
50. Wengraf T (2001) Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage.