A multirate approach to haptic interaction with deformable objects single and multipoint contacts

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 24, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 703-715

  Barbagli, Federico ^a,b   Prattichizzo, Domenico ^b   Salisbury, Kenneth ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Deformable objects; Haptic interfaces; Multi point interaction; Multi rate; Stability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAMPING; ERROR ANALYSIS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; STABILITY;

DEFORMABLE OBJECTS; MULTI-POINT INTERACTION; MULTI-RATE; SERVO RATES;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 25444516043     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364905057055     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Adachi, Y., Kumano, T., and Ogino, K. 1995. Intermediate representation for stiff virtual objects. IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Research Triangle Park, NC, March, pp. 203-210.
2. Adams, R. and Hannaford, B. 1999. Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 15(3):465-474.
3. Astley, O. and Hayward, V. 1998. Multirate haptic simulation achieved by coupling finite element meshes through Norton equivalents. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA98), Leuven, Belgium, pp. 989-994.
4. Balaniuk, R. 1999. Using fast local modeling to buffer haptic data. Proceedings of Fourth Phantom Users Group Workshop (PUG99).
5. Barbagli, F., Prattichizzo, D., and Salisbury, J. 2003. Dynamic local models for stable multicontact haptic interaction with deformable objects. Haptics Symposium 2003, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 109-116.
6. Brady, K. and Tarn, T. 1998. Internet-based remote teleoperation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, May.
7. Cavusoglu, M. and Tendick, F. 2000. Multirate simulation for high fidelity haptic interaction with deformable objects in virtual environments. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, April 24-28, pp. 2458-2465.
8. Colgate, E. and Brown, J. 1994. Factors affecting the z-width of a haptic display. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 3205-3210.
9. Colgate, E., Stanley, M., and Brown, J. 1995. Issues in the haptic display of tool use. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, August.
10. Cotin, S., Delingette, H., and Ayache, N. 2000. A hybrid elastic model allowing real-time cutting, deformation and force feedback for surgery training and simulation. The Visual Computer 16(8):437-452.
11. de Pascale, M., de Pascale, G., Prattichizzo, D., and Barbagli, F. 2004. A new method for haptic GPU rendering of deformable objects. Proceedings of EuroHaptics 2004, Munich, Germany, June.
12. Francis, B. and Georgiou, T. T. 1988. Stability theory for linear time-invariant plants with periodic digital controllers. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 33(9):820-832.
13. Gillespie, B. and Cutkosky, M. 1996. Rendering of the virtual wall. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, November, Vol. 58, pp. 397-406.
14. James, D. and Pai, D. 2001. A unified treatment of elastostatic contact simulation for real time haptics. haptics-e, The Electronic Journal of Haptics Research 2(1).
15. Jury, E. I. 1964. Theory and Applications of the z-Transform Method, Wiley, New York.
16. Khargonekar, P. P., Poolla, K., and Tannenbaum, A. 1985. Robust control of linear time-invariant plants using periodic compensation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 30(11): 1088-1096.
17. Mahvash, M. and Hayward, V. 2003. Passivity-based high-fidelity haptic rendering of contact. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2003), Taipei, Taiwan, September 14-19.
18. Mahvash, M. and Hayward, V. 2004. High fidelity haptic synthesis of contact with deformable bodies. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, special issue on haptic rendering, 48-55.
19. Mark, W., Randolph, S., Finch, M., Verth, J. V., and Taylor, R. 1996. Adding force feedback to graphics systems: issues and solutions. Computer Graphics: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH'96, August, pp. 447-452.
20. Massie, T. 1996. Taking the mush out of haptics with infinitely stiff walls. Proceedings of the First Phantom Users Group Workshop, Dedham, MA, September.
21. Mazzella, F., Montgomery, K., and Latombe, J. 2002. The force grid: a buffer structure for haptic interaction with virtual elastic objects. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA02), Seoul, Korea, May 21-26.
22. Miller, B., Colgate, J., and Freeman, R. A. 2000. Guaranteed stability of haptic systems with nonlinear virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 16(6):712-719.
23. Niemeyer, G. and Slotine, J. 1997. Designing force reflecting teleoperators with large time delays to appear as virtual tools. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 2212-2218.
24. Ruspini, D., Kolarov, K., and Khatib, O. 1997. The haptic display of complex graphical environments. Computer Graphics 31:345-352.
25. Yoshikawa, T., Yokokohji, Y., Matsumoto, T., and Zheng, X. 1995. Display of feel for the manipulation of dynamic virtual objects. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 117(4):554-558.
26. Zilles, C. and Salisbury, J. 1995. A constraint based god-object method for haptic display. Proceedings of the IEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Human Robot Interaction, and Cooperative Robots, Pittsburgh, PA, Vol. 3, pp. 146-151.