From pedagogy to technagogy in social work education: A constructivist approach to instructional design in an online, competency-based child welfare practice course

Child and Youth Care Forum

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 371-389

  Bellefeuille, Gerard ^a   Martin, Robert R ^b,d   Buck, Martin Paul ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b eLearnerWorkscom ^*  (Canada)

^c CAMOSUN COLLEGE   (Canada)

^d FTR and Associates   (Canada)

Author keywords

Child protection; Child welfare; Constructivism; e learning; Online; Social work education; Technagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444438422     PISSN: 10531890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10566-005-5909-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1998). Theory into practice: How do we link?. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 17-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Blanchette, J., & Kanuka, H. (June, 1999). Applying constructivist learning principles in the virtual classroom. Proceedings of Ed-Media/Ed-Telecom 99 World Conference. Seattle, WA.
3. Brown, A. R., & Voltz, B. D. (March, 2005). Elements of effective e-learning design. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. http://www.irrodl.org/content/v6.1/brown_voltz.html.
4. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick, (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. The American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4-36.
6. Dodge, B. (1996). Distance Learning on the World Wide Web. Retrieved January 12, 2003 from http://edweb.sdsu.edu/people/bdodge/ctptg/ctptg.html.
7. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: a conversation. NJ, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Eastmond, D., & Ziegahn, L. (1996). Instructional design for the online classroom. In Z. L. Berge & M. P. Collins (Eds.), Computer mediated communication and the on-line classroom (pp. 59-80). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
9. Gove, Justice Thomas (1995). Report of the Gove inquiry into child protection. British Columbia: Ministry of Social Services.
10. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
11. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 105-140). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
12. Harasim, L. (1996). Online education: the future. In T. M. Harrison & T. Stephen (Eds.), Computer networking and scholarly communication in the twenty-first-century university (pp. 203-214). New York: State University of New York Press.
13. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1996). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
14. Jonassen, D., & Mayes, J. T. (1993). A manifesto for a constructivist approach to technology in higher education. Retrieved May 20, 2003 from http://apu.gcal.ac.uk/clti/papers/TMPaper11.html and http://apu.gcal.ac.uk/clti/ papers/TMPaper11.html.
15. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L, & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: a constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
16. Knowles, M. S., & Associates (1984). Androgogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
17. Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 4-16.
18. Martin, J. (1983). Mastering instruction. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Presseley, M., Hogan, K., Wharton-McDonald, R., & Mistretta, J. (1996). The challenges of instructional scaffolding: the challenges of instruction that supports student thinking. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(3), 138-146.
20. Reigeluth, C. M. (1991). Reflections on the implications of constructivism for educational technology. Educational technolog, 34-37.
21. Ricks F., (2002). The paradox: Research as practice and practice as research. Paper presented at the 2nd National Research Symposium on the Voluntary Sector Coalition of National Voluntary Organizations, Toronto, ON.
22. The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Designing learning environments that support thinking: The Jasper series as a case study. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, D.H. Jonassen, & T. Welsh, (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 9-36), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
23. The E-Learning Guild (2004). The E-learning insider: How do people learn? Some new ideas for e-learning designers. Retrieved April 6, 2005 from http://www.e-learningguild.com/pbuild/linkbuilder.cfm?selection=doc.703#Three.
24. Tiffin, J., & Rajasingham, L. (1995). In search of the virtual class: Education in an information society. London: Routledge Press.
25. Tough, A. (1979). The adult's learning projects. Research in Education Series no. 1. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
26. Twigg, C. (2001). Innovations in online learning: Moving beyond no significant difference. Center for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Retrieved May 12, 2003 from http://www.center.rpi.edu/ PewSym/mono4.html and http://www.center.rpi.edu/PewSym/mono4.html.
27. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 3-16). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Wild, M., & Quinn, C. (1997). Implications of educational theory for the design of instructional multimedia. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 73-82.
29. Willis, J. (1995). A recursive, reflective instructional design model based on constructivist-interpretivist theory. Educational Technology, 35(6), 5-23.
30. Winfield, W., Mealy, M., & Scheibel, P. (August, 1998). Design considerations for enhancing confidence and participation in web based courses. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning. Madison, Wisconsin.
31. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
32. Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.