Surface Roughness and Flexural Strength of Self-Glazed, Polished, and Reglazed In-Ceram/Vitadur Alpha Porcelain Laminates

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 66-71

  Chu, Frederick C S ^a   Frankel, Nicholas ^b   Smales, Roger I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; IN CERAM; IN-CERAM; VITADUR ALPHA OMEGA;

ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; RANDOMIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALGORITHMS; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL VENEERS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PLIABILITY; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0033754647     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sadoun M. All-ceramic bridge with slip casting technique. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ceramics. Paris: Quintessence, 1988.
2. Giordano RA, Campbell S, Pober R. Flexural strength of an infused ceramic, glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:411-418.
3. Giordano RA, Cima M, Pober R. Effects of surface finish on the flexural strength of feldspathic and aluminous dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:311-319.
4. Wagner WC, Chu TM. Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:140-144.
5. Ching LYK. Influence of Adherend Type and Adhesive Thickness on the Flexural Strength of Porcelain/Bovine Tooth Laminates [thesis]. London: Univ of London, 1996.
6. Yoshinari M, Derand T. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. IntJ Prosthodont 1994;7:329-338.
7. Al-Hiyasat AS, Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith G, Gilmour WH. The abrasive effect of glazed, unglazed, and polished porcelain on the wear of human enamel, and the influence of carbonated soft drinks on the rate of wear. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:269-282.
8. Clayton JA, Green E. Roughness of pontic materials and dental plaque. J Prosthet Dent 1970;23:407-411.
9. Brewer JD, Garlapo DA, Chipps EA, Tedesco LA. Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:631-635.
10. Sulik WD, Plekavich EJ. Surface finishing of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:217-221.
11. Klausner LH, Cartwright CB, Charbeneau GT. Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:157-162.
12. Raimondon RL, Richardson JT, Weidner B. Polished versus autoglazed porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:553-557.
13. Fuzzi M, Zaccheroni Z, Vallania G. Scanning electron microscopy and profilometric evaluation of glazed and polished dental porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:452-458.
14. Barghi N, King CJ, Draughn RA. A study of porcelain surfaces as utilized in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:314-319.
15. Patterson CJW, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Refinishing of porcelain by using a refinishing kit. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65: 383-388.
16. Reality. The Information Source for Esthetic Dentistry. Houston: Reality, 1996.
17. Timoshenko S, Woinowsky-Kreiger S. Theory of Plates and Shells, ed 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.
18. McLean JW, Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J 1965;119:251-265.
19. Monasky GE, Taylor DF. Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:299-306.
20. Barghi N, Alexander L, Draughn RA. When to glaze - An electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1976;35:648-653.
21. Zalkind M, Lauer S, Stern N. Porcelain surface texture after reduction and natural glazing. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:30-33.
22. Griggs JA, Thompson JY, Anusavice KJ. Effects of flaw size and auto-glaze treatment on porcelain strength. J Dent Res 1996;75: 1414-1417.
23. Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res 1990;69:1791-1799.
24. Piddock V, Marquis PM, Wilson HJ. The mechanical strength and microstructure of all-ceramic crowns. J Dent 1987;15:153-158.
25. McLean JW. The Science and Art of Dental Ceramics, vol 1. Chicago: Quintessence, 1979.
26. Hopkins K. An investigation into the role of porcelain thickness in determining the load-carrying capacity of porcelain laminates. Br Dent J 1989;167:201-204.
27. Zeng K, Oden A, Rowcliffe D. Flexure tests on dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:434-439.
28. Darvell B. Review: Uniaxial compressive tests and the validity of indirect tensile strength. J Mater Sci 1990;25:757-780.
29. Griffith GA. The phenomenon of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1920;A221:163.
30. Williamson RT, Kovarik RE, Mitchell RJ. Effects of grinding, polishing, and overglazing on the flexural strength of a high leucite feldspathic porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:30-37.
31. Giordano RA, Campbell S, Pober R. Flexural strength of feldspathic porcelain treated with ion exchange, overglaze, and polishing. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:468-472.
32. Sherill CA, O'Brien WJ. Transverse strength of aluminous and feldspathic porcelain. J Dent Res 1974;53:683-690.
33. Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Thompson WO. The effect of glaze on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 1992;8:203-207.