Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology

Lingua

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 281-298

  Eddington, David ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Analogy; Dual route; English past tense; Exemplar based; Single route

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001158373     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3841(99)00043-1     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aha, D.W., D. Kibler and M.K. Albert, 1991. Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning 6, 37-66.
2. Allen, P., M. McNeal and D. Kvak, 1992. Perhaps the lexicon is coded as a function of word frequency. Journal of Memory and language 31, 826-844.
3. Bod, R., 1998. Beyond grammar: An experienced-based theory of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Butterworth, B., 1983. Lexical representation. In: B. Butterworth (ed.), Language production, vol. 2, 257-294. London: Academic Press.
5. Bybee, J., 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
6. Bybee, J., 1988. Morphology as lexical organization. In: M. Hammond, M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical approaches to morphology, 119-141. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Bybee, J., 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 425-455.
8. Bybee, J.L. and C.L. Moder, 1983. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59, 251-270.
9. Bybee, J.L. and D.I. Slobin, 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58, 265-289.
10. Chandler, S., 1993. Are rules and modules really necessary for explaining language? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22, 593-606.
11. Chandler, S., 1995. Non-declarative linguistics: Some neuropsychological perspectives. Rivista di Linguistica 7, 233-247.
12. Chandler, S. and R. Skousen, 1997. Analogical modeling and the English past tense: A reply to Jaeger et al. 1996. Ms. (http: //humanities.byu.edu/aml/jaeger.html).
13. Clahsen, H., M. Rothweiler, A. Woest and G. Marcus, 1992. Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition 45, 225-255.
14. Cottrell, G.W. and K. Plunkett, 1994. Acquiring the mapping from meaning to sounds. Connection Science 6, 379-412.
15. Daelemans, W., S. Gillis and G. Durieux, 1994. Skousen's analogical modeling algorithm: A comparison with lazy learning. In: D. Jones (ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on new methods in language processing, 1-7. Manchester: UMIST.
16. Daelemans, W., J. Zavrel, K. van der Sloot and A. van den Bosch, 1999. TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 2.0, reference guide. Induction of Linguistic Knowledge Technical Report. Tilburg, Netherlands: ILK Research Group, Tilburg University, (http: //ilk.kub.nl/∼ilk/papers/ilk9901.ps.gz).
17. Daugherty, K. and M. Hare, 1993. The past tense by some other name might be called a connectionist net. In: M. Mozer, P. Smolensky, D. Touretzky, J. Elman (eds.), Proceedings of the 1993 connectionist models summer school. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Daugherty, K. and M.S. Seidenberg, 1992. Rules or connections? The past tense revised. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 259-264. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Daugherty, K. and M.S. Seidenberg, 1994. Beyond rules and exceptions: A connectionist approach to inflectional morphology. In: S.D. Lima, R.L. Corrigan, G.K. Iverson (eds.), The reality of linguistic rules, 353-388. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
20. Derwing, B.L. and R. Skousen, 1994. Productivity and the English past tense: Testing Skousen's analogy model. In: S.D. Lima, R.L. Corrigan, G.K. Iverson (eds.), The reality of linguistic rules, 193-218. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
21. Elman, J.L., E.A. Bates, M.H. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi and K. Plunkett, 1996. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Francis, N.W. and H. Kučera, 1982. Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23. Jaeger, J.J., A.H. Lockwood, D.L. Kemmerer, R.D. Van Valin Jr., B.W. Murphy and H.G. Khalak, 1996. A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language 72, 451-497.
24. Jones, D., 1996. Analogical natural language processing. London: UCL Press.
25. Katz, L., K. Rexer and G. Lukatela, 1991. The processing of inflected words. Psychological research 53, 25-32.
26. Lachter, J. and T.G. Bever, 1988. The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning: A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models. Cognition 28, 195-247.
27. MacKay, D.G., 1982. The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review 89, 60-94.
28. MacWhinney, B. and J. Leinbach, 1991. Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition 40, 121-157.
29. Manelis, L. and D.A. Tharp, 1977. The processing of affixed words. Memory and Cognition 5, 690-695.
30. Marchman, V.A., 1997. Children's productivity in the English past tense: The role of frequency, phonology, and neighborhood structure. Cognitive Science 21, 283-304.
31. Marcus, G.F., S. Pinker, M. Ullman, M. Hollander, T.J. Rosen, and F. Xu, 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57, Serial No. 228.
32. Marcus, G., 1995. The acquisition of the English past tense in children and multilayered connectionist networks. Cognition 56, 271-279.
33. Marcus, G., 1998. The algebraic mind: Reflections on connectionism and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press.
34. Marcus, G.F., U. Brinkmann, H. Clahsen, R. Wiese, A. Woest, and S. Pinker, 1995. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29, 189-256.
35. Marslen-Wilson, W. and L. Tyler, 1997. Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature 387, 592-594.
36. McClelland, J.L., 1988. Connectionist models and psychological evidence. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 107-123.
37. Medin, D.L. and M.M. Schaffer, 1978. Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 85, 207-238.
38. Nakisa, R.C., K. Plunkett and U. Hahn, 1998. A cross-linguistic comparison of single and dual-route models of inflectional morphology. In: P. Broeder, and J. Murre (eds.), Cognitive models of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Nosofsky, R.M., 1988. Exemplar based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14, 700-708.
40. Nosofsky, R.M., 1990. Relations between exemplar similarity and likelyhood models of classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 34, 393-418.
41. Penke, M., H. Weyerts, M. Gross, E. Zander, H. Clahsen and T.F. Münte, 1997. How the brain processes complex words: An ERP-study of German verb inflections. Cognitive Brain Research 6, 37-52.
42. Pinker, S., 1991. Rules of language. Science 253, 530-534.
43. Pinker, S., 1997. Words and rules in the human brain. Nature 387, 547-548
44. Pinker, S. and A. Prince, 1988. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28, 73-193.
45. Pinker, S. and A. Prince, 1994. Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In: S.D. Lima, R.L. Corrigan, G.K. Iverson (eds.), The reality of linguistic rules, 321-351. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
46. Plunkett, K. and V. Marchman, 1991. U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception. Cognition 38, 43-102.
47. Prasada, S. and S. Pinker, 1993. Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 1-56.
48. Prasada, S., S. Pinker and W. Snyder, 1990. Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule-generated. Paper presented at the 31st annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November, New Orleans, LA.
49. Riesbeck, C.K. and R.S. Schank, 1989. Inside case-based reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Rumelhart, D.E. and J.L. McClelland, 1986. On learning the past tense of English verbs. In: J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart, PDP Research Group (eds.), Parallel distributed processing, vol. 2, 216-271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Scarborough, D.L., C. Cortese and H.S. Scarborough, 1977. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 3, 1-17.
52. Seidenberg, M.S., 1992. Connectionism without tears. In: S. Davis (ed.), Connectionism: Theory and practice, 84-122. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Seidenberg, M. and M. Bruck, 1990. Consistency effects in the generation of past tense morphology. Annual meeting of the American psychonomic society, New Orleans, LA, November 23-25.
54. Seidenberg, M.S. and J.H. Hoeffner, 1998. Evaluating behavioral and neuroimaging data on past tense processing. Language 74, 104-122.
55. Sereno, J.A. and A. Jongman, 1997. Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition 25, 425-37.
56. Shanks, D.R., 1995. The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Skousen, R., 1989. Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
58. Skousen, R., 1992. Analogy and structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
59. Skousen, R., 1995. Analogy: A non-rule alternative to neural networks. Rivista di Linguistica 7, 213-232.
60. Stemberger, J.P., 1994. Rule-less morphology at the phonology-lexicon interface. The reality of linguistic rules, In: S.D. Lima, R.L. Corrigan, G.K. Iverson (eds.), 147-169. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
61. Stemberger, J.P. and B. MacWhinney, 1986. Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition 14, 17-26.
62. Stemberger, J.P. and B. MacWhinney, 1988. Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon? In: M. Hammond, M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical approaches to morphology, 101-116. San Diego: Academic Press.
63. Taft, M., 1981. Prefix stripping revised. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 20, 289-297.
64. Taft, M., 1985. The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphograhic approach. In: D. Besner, T. Walker, G. MacKinnon (eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, vol. 5. New York: Academic Press.
65. Ullman, M.T., 1999. Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past-tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighbourhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes 14, 47-67.