Dispersive manipulation of paired superconducting qubits

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2004, Pages

  Zhou, Xingxiang ^a,b   Wulf, Michael ^b   Zhou, Zhengwei ^c   Guo, Guangcan ^c   Feldman, Marc J ^a  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAPACITANCE; COUPLED CIRCUITS; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); ENERGY TRANSFER; HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; QUANTUM ELECTRONICS; RESONATORS; SQUIDS; VOLTAGE MEASUREMENT;

CHARGE BOXES (CB); DISPERSIVE DYNAMICS; PAIR OF CHARGE BOXES (PCB); QUANTUM-INFORMATION PROCESSING (QIP);

SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS;

EID: 2542479102     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.030301     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A. Shnirman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2371 (1997).
2. Y. Nakamura et al., Nature (London) 398, 786 (1999).
3. D. Vion et al., Science 296, 886 (2002).
4. Yu.A. Pashkin et al., Nature (London) 421, 823 (2003).
5. A.J. Leggett et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987).
6. Y. Nakamura et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 047901 (2002).
7. Casper H. van der Wal et al., Eur. Phys. J. B 31, 111 (2003).
8. Y. Makhlin et al., Nature (London) 398, 305 (1999).
9. J.Q. You et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 197902 (2002).
10. X. Zhou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 197903 (2002).
11. S.C. Benjamin and S. Bose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 247901 (2003).
12. F. Plastina and G. Falci, Phys. Rev. B 67, 224514 (2003).
13. A. Biais et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 127901 (2003).
14. M. Brune et al., Phys. Rev. A 45, 5139 (1992).
15. A.B. Zorin et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 13 682 (1996).
16. E. Paladino et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 228304 (2002).
17. Y. Makhlin et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001).
18. J. Kempe et al., Phys. Rev. A 63, 042307 (2001).
19. J.B. Majer et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3638 (2002).
20. J.-Q. You et al., Phys. Rev. B 63, 180501 (R) (2000).
21. b〉. respectively. Note here the coupling energy γ must be taken into account in determining the in-resonance condition.
22. S.-B. Zheng and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000); S.-B. Zheng, ibid. 87, 230404 (2001).
23. S.-B. Zheng and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000); S.-B. Zheng, ibid. 87, 230404 (2001).
24. Reducing the requirements for QIP to just local symmetry implies that only pairwise identical CBs are needed, which can be achieved [15] because fabrication variations tend to occur over large distances.
25. D. Song et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 5, 3058 (1995).
26. V.A. Krupenin et al., J. Low Temp. Phys. 118, 287 (2000).
27. T.M. Buehler et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 577 (2003).
28. A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1971 (1999).
29. J. Gea-Banacloche, Phys. Rev. A 65, 022308 (2002).
30. M. Wulf et al. (unpublished).
31. D. Born et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, 373 (2001).