Nonlinear, near photo-realistic caricatures using a parametric facial appearance model

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 170-181

  Gibson, Stuart J ^a   Solomon, Christopher J ^a   Pallares Bejarano, Alvaro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ART; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ATTENTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ATTENTION; CARICATURES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 25144433982     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206412     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BENSON, P. J., & PERRETT, D. I. (1991). Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images. European Journal of Psychology, 3, 105-135.
2. BENSON, P. J., & PERRETT, D. I. (1993). Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars. Perception, 22, 257-262.
3. BRENNAN, S. E. (1985). The caricature generator. Leonardo, 18, 170-178.
4. BRUCE, V., HANCOCK, P., & BURTON, A. M. (1998). Human face perception and identification. In H. Wechsler, P. J. Phillips, V. Bruce, F. F. Soulie, & T. S. Huang (Eds.), Face Recognition: From theory to applications (pp. 51-73). New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. BURT, D. M., & PERRETT, D. I. (1995). Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: Computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 335, 137-143.
6. BURTON, A. M. (1994). Learning new faces in an interactive activation and competition model. Visual Cognition, 1, 313-348.
7. BURTON, A. M., BRUCE, V., & HANCOCK, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1-31.
8. BYATT, G., & RHODES, G. (1998). Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition. Vision Research, 38, 2455-2468.
9. COOTES, T. F., EDWARDS, G. J., & TAYLOR, C. J. (1998). Active appearance models. In H. Burkhardt & B. Neumann (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (Vol. 2, pp. 484-498). New York: Springer-Verlag.
10. ELLIS, A. W., BURTON, A. M., YOUNG, A. M., & FLUDE, B. M. (1997). Repetition priming between parts and wholes: Tests of a computational model of familiar face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 579-608.
11. GIBSON, S. J., PALLARES. A., & SOLOMON, C. J. (2003). Synthesis of photographic quality facial composites using evolutionary algorithms. In R. Harvey & J. A. Banham (Eds.), Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2003 (Vol. 1, pp. 221-230). Norwich, U.K.: Page Bros.
12. GOODALL, C. (1991). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 53, 285-339.
13. HANCOCK, P. J. B. (2000). Evolving faces from principal components. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 327-333.
14. HANCOCK, P. J. B., BRUCE. V., & BURTON, A. M. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory & Cognition, 24, 26-40.
15. JOLLIFFE, I. T. (1986). Principal component analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. LANITIS, A, TAYLOR, C. J., & COOTES, T. F. (2002). Toward automatic simulation of ageing effects on face images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24, 442-455.
17. LEE, K. J., & PERRETT, D. I. (1997). Presentation time measures of the effects of manipulation in colour space on discrimination of famous faces. Perception, 26, 733-752.
18. LEE, K. J., & PERRETT, D. I. (2000). Manipulation of colour and shape information and its consequence upon recognition and best-likeness judgments. Perception, 29, 1291-1312.
19. MOGHADDAM, B., & PENTLAND, A. (1997). Probabilistic visual learning for object representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19, 696-710.
20. O'TOOLE, A. J., DEFFENBACHER, K. A, VALENTIN, D., & ABDI, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory & Cognition, 22, 208-224.
21. PERRETT, D. I., MAY, K. A., & YOSHIKAWA, S. (1994). Facial shapes and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature, 368, 239-242.
22. RHODES, G., BRENNAN, S., & CAREY, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-497.
23. SCHEUCHENPFLUG, R. (1999). Predicting face similarity judgements with a computational model of face space. Acta Psychologica, 100, 229-242.
24. SIRIVICH, L., & KIRBY, M. (1987). Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 519-524.
25. TURK, M., & PENTLAND, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 71-86.
26. VALENTINE, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
27. VALENTINE, T. (2000). Face-space models of face recognition. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 83-113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.