Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 15-16, 1998, Pages 2455-2468

  Byatt, Graham ^a   Rhodes, Gillian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Absolute coding; Caricature effects; Face recognition; Norm based coding; Race

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHINESE; DENSITY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE; RECOGNITION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; FACIES; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0031830444     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00469-0     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Valentine T A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol. 43A:1991;161-204.
2. Biederman I Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev. 94:1987;115-147.
3. Marr D Vision. 1982;Freeman, San Francisco.
4. Rosch EH On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. Moore TE Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. 1973;Academic Press, New York.
5. Rhodes G Superportraits: Caricatures and recognition. 1996;The Psychology Press, Hove.
6. Shepard RN Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika. 22:1957;325-345.
7. Nosofsky RM Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorisation relationship. J Exp Psychol: Gen. 115:1986;39-57.
8. Valentine T. Representation and process in face recognition. In: Watt RJ, editor. Vision and Visual Dysfunction, Vol. 14. Pattern recognition by man and machine. (Series editor, Cronley-Dillon J). Macmillan: London, 1991b.
9. Valentine T, Endo M Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness. Q J Exp Psychol. 44A:1992;671-703.
10. Ellis HD, Theoretical aspects of face recognition. In: Davies GM, Ellis HD, Shepherd JW (Eds.) Perceiving and Remembering Faces Academic Press: London, 1981; pp. 171-197.
11. Rhodes G, Brennan S, Carey S Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognit Psychol. 19:1987;473-497.
12. Valentine T, Bruce V The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception. 15:1986;525-535.
13. Bruce V, Burton MA, Dench N What's distinctive about a distinctive face? Q J Exp Psychol. 47A:1994;119-141.
14. Johnston RA, Ellis HD Age effects in the processing of typical and distinctive faces. Q J Exp Psychol. 48A:1995;447-465.
15. Rhodes G, Byatt G, Tremewan T, Kennedy A Facial distinctiveness and the power of caricatures. Percept. 25:1996;207-223.
16. Brigham JC Target person distinctiveness and attractiveness as moderator variables in the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identifications. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 11:1990;101-115.
17. Going M, Read JD Effects of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition. Percept Mot Skills. 39:1974;109-110.
18. Light L, Kayra-Stuart F, Hollander S Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. J Exp Psychol: Human Learning and Memory. 5:1979;212-219.
19. Perkins D. A definition of caricature, and caricature and recognition. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 1975;2(1): 1-24.
20. Benson PJ, Perrett DI Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images. Eur J Cognit Psychol. 3:1991;105-135.
21. Benson PJ, Perrett DI Visual processing of facial distinctiveness. Percept. 23:1994;75-93.
22. Rhodes G, Tremewan T Understanding face recognition: Caricature effects, inversion and the homogeneity problem. Visual Cognit. 1:1994;275-311.
23. Brennan SE The caricature generator. Leonardo. 18:1985;170-178.
24. Rhodes G, McLean IG Distinctiveness and expertise effects with homogeneous stimuli: Towards a model of configural coding. Percept. 19:1990;773-794.
25. Bothwell RK, Brigham JC, Malpass RS Cross-racial identification. Person Soc Psychol Bull. 15:1989;19-25.
26. Chiroro P, Valentine T An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol. 48A:1995;879-894.
27. Goldstein AG Race-related variation of facial features: Anthropometric data I. Bull Psychonom Soc. 13:1979;187-190.
28. Goldstein A.G. Facial feature variation of: Anthropometric data II. Bull Psychonom Soc. 13:1979;191-193.
29. Attneave F Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol Rev. 61:1954;183-193.
30. Clark HH The language-as fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. J Verbal Learning Verbal Beh. 12:1973;335-339.
31. Ellis HD The development of face processing skills. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B. 335:1992;105-111.
32. Lavrakas PJ, Buri JR, Mayzner MS A perspective on the recognition of other-race faces. Percept Psychophys. 20:1976;475-481.
33. O'Toole AJ, Deffenbacher K, Valentin D, Abdi H Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Mem Cognit. 22:1994;208-224.
34. Rhodes G, Carey S, Byatt G, Proffitt F. Coding spatial variations in faces and simple sahpes: a test for two models. Vis Res, this issue.