Predicting face similarity judgements with a computational model of face space

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 229-242

  Scheuchenpflug, Rainer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive processes; Face perception; Stimulus similarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347091244     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00019-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abdi, H., Valentin, D., Edelman, B., O'Toole, A., 1995. More about the difference between men and women: Evidence from a linear neural network and principal-component approach. Perception 24, 539-562.
2. Bäuml, K.H., Schnelzer, M., Zimmer, A., 1997. The influence of inversion on the judgement of facial and non-facial attributes. Acta Psychologica 96, 27-42.
3. Bartko, J.J., 1976. On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin 83, 762-765.
4. Burton, A.M., Bruce, V., Dench, N., 1993. What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement. Perception 22, 153-177.
5. Chellappa, R., Wilson, C.L., Sirohey, S., 1995. Human and machine recognition of faces: A survey. Proc. IEEE 83, 705-740.
6. Diamond, R., Carey, S., 1986. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. J. Experimental Psychology: General 115, 107-117.
7. Farah, M.J., Tanaka, J.W., Drain, H.M., 1995. What causes the face inversion effect?. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 628-634.
8. Gervais, M.J., Harvey, L.O. Jr., Roberts, J.O., 1984. Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. J. Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance 10, 655-666.
9. Hancock, P.J.B., Bruce, V., Burton, A.M., 1997. Testing principal component representations for faces. In: Bullinaria, J.A., Glasspool, D.W., Houghton, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop. Springer, London, pp. 84-97.
10. Hancock, P.J.B., Burton, A.M., Bruce, V., 1996. Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory and Cognition 24, 26-40.
11. Johnston, R.A., Ellis, H.D., 1995. The development of face recognition. In: Valentine, T. (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. Explorations in face space. Routledge, London, pp. 1-23.
12. Jones, L.E., Koehly, L.M., 1993. Multidimensional scaling. In: Keren, G., Lewis, C. (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 95-163.
13. Kirby, M., Sirovich, L., 1990. Application of the Karhunen-Loeve procedure for the characterization of human faces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12, 103-108.
14. Lahey, M.A., Downey, R.G., Saal, F.E., 1983. Intraclass correlations: Theres more there than meets the eye. Psychological Bulletin 93, 586-595.
15. Laughery, K.R., 1974. Time delay and similarity effects in facial recognition performance. J. Applied Psychology 59, 490-496.
16. O'Toole, A.J., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K.A., Bartlett, J., 1991. Classifying faces by race and sex using an autoassociative memory trained for recognition. In: Program of the 13th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 847-851.
17. O'Toole, A.J., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K.A., Valentin, D., 1993. Low-dimensional representation of faces in the higher dimensions of the face space. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 10, 405-411.
18. O'Toole, A.J., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K.A., Valentin, D., 1995. A perceptual learning theory of the information in faces. In: Valentine, T. (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. Explorations in face space. Routledge, London, pp. 159-182.
19. O'Toole, A.J., Deffenbacher, K.A., Valentin, D., Abdi, H., 1994. Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race-effect. Memory and Cognition 22, 208-224.
20. O'Toole, A.J., Vetter, T., Troje, N., Bülthoff, H., 1997. Sex classification is better with three-dimensional head structure than with image intensity information. Perception 26, 15-84.
21. Pentland, A., Moghaddam, B., Starner, T., 1994. Viewbased and modular eigenspaces for face recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1994. Los Alamos, CA; IEEE Press, New York, pp. 84-91.
22. Shepard, R.N., 1958. Stimulus and response generalization: Deductions of the generalization gradient from a trace model. Psychological Review 65, 242-256.
23. Shepherd, J., Davies, G., Ellis, H., 1981. Studies of cue saliency. In: Davies, G., Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J. (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces, Academic Press, London, pp. 105-131.
24. Turk, M., Pentland, A., 1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cognitive Neuroscience 3, 71-86.
25. Valentin, D., Abdi, H., Edelman, B., O'Toole, A.J., 1997. Principal component and neural network analyses of face images: What can be generalized in gender classification?. J. Math. Psych 41, 398-413.
26. Valentin, D., Abdi, H., O'Toole, A.J., Cotrell, G.W., 1994. Connectionist models of face processing: A survey. Pattern Recognition 27, 1209-1230.
27. Valentine, T., 1991. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quart. J. Experimental Psychology- Human Experimental Psychology 43A, 161-204.