Toward a new payment system for inpatient rehabilitation - Part I: Predicting resource consumption

Medical Care

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 844-855

  Saitto, Carlo ^a   Marino, Claudia ^a   Fusco, Danilo ^a   Arcà, Massimo ^a,b   Perucci, Carlo A ^a  

^a Local Health Authority RME   (Italy)

^b Local Health Authority RME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Factorial analysis; Functional status; Inpatient rehabilitation; Prospective payment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; DISABILITY; ECONOMICS; FORECASTING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; ITALY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NURSING HOME; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; REIMBURSEMENT; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VALIDATION STUDY;

DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FORECASTING; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH RESOURCES; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; ITALY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTERS; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES;

EID: 24944553329     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173567.80190.32     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
2. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "MINI-MENTAL STATE." A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician. J Psychiat Res. 1975:189-198.
3. Keith RA, Granger C, Hamilton BB, et al. The Functional Indepence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6-18.
4. Moskowitz E. PULSES profile in retrospect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:647-648.
5. Liu M, Chino N, Tuji T, et al. Psychometric properties of the stroke impairment assessment set (SIAS). Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:339-351.
6. Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, et al. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine. 2002;27:515-522.
7. Levin HS, High WM, Goethe KE, et al. The neurobehavioural rating scale: assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:183-193.
8. Demers L, Oremus M, Perrault A, et al. Review of outcome measurement instruments in Alzheimer's disease drug trials: introduction. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2000;13:161-169.
9. Wee JY, Wong H, Palepu A. Validation of the Berg Balance Scale as a predictor of length of stay and discharge destination in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:731-735.
10. Zwecker M, Levenkrohn S, Fleisig Y, et al. Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment: relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:342-345.
11. Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Halliwell D. The Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA): a directly costable outcome measure in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:253-267.
12. Smith A, Cardillo JE, Smith SC, et al. Improvement scaling (rehabilitation version). A new approach to measuring progress of patients in achieving their individual rehabilitation goals. Med Care. 1998;36:333-347.
13. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, et al. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:531-536.
14. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, et al. Performance profiles of the Functional Independence Measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72:84-89.
15. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, et al. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:566-572.
16. Heinemann AW, Kirk P, Hastie BA, et al. Relationships between disability measures and nursing effort during rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:143-149.
17. Mortifee PRS, Busser J, Anton HA. The performance of a limited set of items from the Functional Independence Measure for use in acute trauma care and rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:436-439.
18. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, et al. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226-1232.
19. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Granger CV, et al. Predicting the achievement of 6 grades of physical independence from data routinely collected at admission to rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1647-1656.
20. Granger CV, Tesio L, Linn RT. Functional mobility measures in older adults after hip fracture. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:901-902.
21. Granger CV, Tesio L, Linn RT. Functional mobility measures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:775-777.
22. Granger CV, Wende K, Brownscheidle CM. Use of the FIM instrument in a trial of intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:427-436.
23. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Fiedler R, et al. Staging functional independence validity and applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:38-45.
24. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Fiedler R, et al. Functional independence staging: conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:29-37.
25. Stineman MG, Escarce JJ, Tassoni CJ, et al. Diagnostic coding and medical rehabilitation length of stay: their relationship. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:241-248.
26. Stineman MG, Granger CV. A modular case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation illustrated. Health Care Financ Rev. 1997;19:87-103.
27. Stineman MG, Tassoni CJ, Escarce JJ, et al. Development of function-related groups version 2.0: a classification system for medical rehabilitation. Health Serv Res. 1997;32:529-548.
28. Stineman MG, Escarce JJ, Goin JE, et al. A case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation. Med Care. 1994;32:366-379.
29. Medicare program; prospective payment System for Inpatient rehabilitation facilities; proposed rule. Fed Regis. 2000;65:66303-66442.
30. Williams BC, Li Y, Fries BE, et al. Predicting patient scores between the functional independence measure and the minimum data set: development and performance of a FIM-MDS "crosswalk." [Erratum in: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:231]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:48-54.
31. Buchanan JL, Andres PL, Haley SM, et al. An assessment tool translation study. Health Care Financ Rev. 2003;24:45-60.
32. Buchanan JL, Andres P, Haley S, et al. Final Report on Assessment Instruments for PPS. 2002;R-1501-CMS. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
33. Buchanan JL, Andres P, Haley S, et al. Appendices to the Final Report on Assessment Instruments for PPS. 2002;MR-1501/1-CMS. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
34. Carter GM, Beeuwkes BM, Hayden O, et al. Analyses for the initial implementation of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System, MR-1500-CMS. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 2001.
35. Einhorn HJ. Alchemy in the behavioral sciences. Public Opinion Q. 1972;36:367-378.
36. Marshall RJ. The use of classification and regression trees in clinical epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:603-609.
37. Thompson JR. Estimating equations for kappa statistics. Stat Med. 2001;20:2895-2906.
38. Cohen A. Comparison of correlated correlations. Stat Med. 1989;8:1485-1495.
39. Michelozzi P, Perucci CA, Forastiere F, et al. Inequality in health: socioeconomic differentials in mortality in Rome, 1990-95. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:687-693.
40. Picard RR, Berk KN. Data splitting. Am Stat. 1990;44:140-147.
41. McPherson KM, Pentland B, Cudmore SF, et al. An inter-rater reliability study of the Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM). Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18:341-347.
42. Vanier M, Mazaux JM, Lambert J, et al. Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:796-806.
43. Brenner H, Kliebsch U. Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Epidemiology. 1996;7:199-202.
44. Tesio L, Franchignoni FP, Perucca L, et al. The influence of age on length of stay, functional independence and discharge destination of rehabilitation inpatients in Italy. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18:502-508.
45. Hachisuka K, Saeki S, Tsutsui Y, et al. Gender-related differences in scores of the Barthel Index and Frenchay activities index in randomly sampled elderly persons living at home in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:1089-1094.
46. Campbell IM, Burgess PM, Finch SJ. A factorial analysis of BDI scores. J Clin Psychol. 1984;40:992-996.
47. Norquist JM, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C. Rasch measurement in the assessment of amytrophic lateral sclerosis patients. J Appl Meas. 2003;4:249-257.
48. Tesio L. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:105-115.
49. Chen CC, Heinemann AW, Granger CV, et al. Functional gains and therapy intensity during subacute rehabilitation: a study of 20 facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1514-1523.
50. Linacre JM. FIM levels as ordinal categories. J Outcome Meas. 2000;4:616-633.