An assessment tool translation study

Health Care Financing Review

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 45-60

  Buchanan, Joan L ^a   Andres, Patricia L ^b   Haley, Stephen M ^b   Paddock, Susan M ^b   Zaslavsky, Alan M ^b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSUMER; DATA BASE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CODING; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; MEDICARE; POLICY MAKING; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM; REHABILITATION CENTERS; SUBACUTE CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038723232     PISSN: 01958631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Applegate, W.B., Blass, J.P., and Williams F.T.: Instruments for the Functional Assessment of Older Patients. New England Journal of Medicine 322 (17):1207-1214, 1990.
2. Branch, L.G., and Meyers, A.R.: Assessing Physical Function in the Elderly. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 3 (1):29-51, 1987.
3. Buchanan, J.L., Andres, P. L., Haley, S.M., et al.: Final Report on the Instruments for PPS. MR-1501-CMS. RAND. Santa Monica, CA. 2002.
4. Carter, G.M., Buntin, M.B., Hayden, O., et al.: Analyses for the Implementation of Medicare's Inpatient Rehabilitation Prospective Payment System. MR-1501-CMS. RAND. Santa Monica, CA. 2002.
5. Casten, R., Lawton, M.P., Parmelee, P.A., and Kleban, M.H.: Psychometric Characteristics of the Minimum Data Set I: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 46(6):726-735, June 1998.
6. Corrigan, J.D., Smith-Knapp, K., and Grange, C.V.: Validity of the Functional Independence Measure for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78(8):828-834, August 1997.
7. Dodds, T.A., Martin, D.P., Stolov, W.C., and Deyo, R. A.: A Validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and Its Performance Among Rehabilitation Inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabilitation 74(5):531-536, May 1993.
8. Federal Register. Medicare Program: Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities; Proposed Rule. 65 FR 26281, May 5, 2000.
9. Fries, B.E., Schneider, D.P., Foley, W.J., et al.: Refining a Case-Mix Measure for Nursing Homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG III). Medical Care 32(7):668-685, July 1994.
10. Granger, C.V., Hamilton, B.B., Keith, R.A., et al.: Advances in Functional Assessment for Medical Rehabilitation. In Lewis, C.B. (ed.): Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 1:59-74, 1986.
11. Hamilton, B.B., Granger, C.V., Sherwin, F.S., et al.: A Uniform National Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. In Fuhrer, M.J. (ed.): Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore, MD. Brookes Publishing Co. 1987.
12. Hamilton, B.B., Laughlin, J.A, Fiedler, R.C., and Granger, C.V. Inter-rater Reliability of the Seven Level Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 26:115-119, 1994.
13. Hawes, C., Morris, J. N., Phillips, C. D., et al.: Development of the Nursing Home Resident Assessment Instrument in the U.S.A. Age and Aging 26(Suppl 2):19-25, September 1997.
14. Hawes, C., Morris, J. N., Phillips, C. D., et al.: Reliability Estimates for the Minimum Data Sets for Nursing Home Resident Assessment and Care Screening (MDS). The Gerontologist 35(2):172-178, April 1995.
15. Heinemann, A.W., Linacre, J.M., Wright, B.D., et al.: Relationships Between Impairment and Physical Disability as Measured by the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 74 (6):566-573, June 1993.
16. Hittle, D. F., Crisler, K. S., Beaudry, J. M. et al.: OASIS and Outcome-Based Quality Improvement in Home Health Care: Research and Demonstration Findings, Policy Implications, and Considerations for Future Change. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. March 2002. Internet address: www.cms.hhs.gov/providers/hha. (Accessed 2003.)
17. Hosek, S., Kane, P., Carney, M., et al.: Charges and Outcomes for Rehabilitative Care: Implications for the Prospective Payment System. R-3424-HCFA. RAND. Santa Monica, CA. 1986.
18. Institute of Medicine Study: Improving the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes. National Academy of Sciences Press. Washington, DC. 1986.
19. Jette, A.M.: How Measurement Techniques Influence Estimates of Disability in Older Populations. Social Science and Medicine 38(7):937-942. July 1994.
20. Katz, S., Ford, A.B., Moskowitz, R.W., et al.: Studies of Illness in the Aged. The Index of the ADL: A Standardized Measure of Biological and Psychological Functioning. Journal of the American Medical Association 185(12):914-919, September 1963.
21. Lawton, M.P., and Brody, E.M.: Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Gerontologist 9 (3):179-186, September 1969.
22. Lawton, M.P., Casten, R., Parmelee, P.A., et al.: Psychometric Characteristics of the Minimum Data Set II: Validity. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 46(6):736-744, June 1998.
23. McDowell, I. and Newell, C.: Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Ouestionnaires. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 1996.
24. Morris, J.N., Hawes, C., Fries, B.E., et al.: Designing the National Resident Assessment Instrument for Nursing Homes. The Gerontologist 30(3):293-307, June 1990.
25. Pollak, N., Rheault, W., and Stoecker, J.L.: Reliability and Validity of the FIM™ for Persons Aged 80 Years and Above From a Multilevel Continuing Care Retirement Community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 77(10):1056-1061, October 1996.
26. Rasch, G.: Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, IL. 1980.
27. Ravaud, J.E, Delcey, M., and Yelnik, A.: Construct Validity of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™): Questioning the Unidimensionality of the Scale and the Value of FIM™ Scores. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 31(1):31-41, March 1999.
28. Segal, M.D., Ditunno, J.F., and Staas, W.E.: Interinstitutional Agreement of Individual Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) Items Measured at Two Sites on One Sample of SCI Patients. Paraplegia 31:622-631, 1993.
29. Sgadari, A., Morris, J.N., Fries, B.E., et al.: Efforts to Establish the Reliability of the Resident Assessment Instrument. Age and Aging 26(Suppl 2):27-30, September 1997.
30. Sharrack, B., Hughes, R.A.C., Soudain, S., and Dunn, G.: The Psychometric Properties of Clinical Rating Scales Used in Multiple Sclerosis. Brain 122(1):141-159, January 1999.
31. Snowden, M., McCormick, W., Russo, J., et al.: Validity and Responsiveness of the Minimum Data Set. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 47(8): 1000-1004, August 1999.
32. Stineman, M.G., Goin, J.E., Hamilton, B.B., and Granger, C.V.: A Case Mix Classification System for Medical Rehabilitation. Medical Care 32(4):366-79, April 1994.
33. Stineman, M.G., Shea, JA., Jette, A., et al.: The Functional Independence Measure: Tests of Scaling Assumptions, Structure, and Reliability Across 20 Diverse Impairment Categories. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 77(11):1101-1108, November 1996.
34. Stineman, M.G., Jette, A.J., Fiedler, R.C., and Granger, C.V.: Impairment-Specific Dimensions Within the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78(6):636-643, June 1997.
35. Teresi, J.A, Lawton, M.P., Holmes, D., and Ory, M. (eds.): Measurement in Elderly Chronic Care Populations. Springer Publishing, New York, NY. 1997.
36. Williams, B.C]., Li, Y., Fries, B.E., and Warren, R.L.: Predicting Patient Sores Between the Functional Independence Measure and the Minimum Data Set: Development and Performance of a FIM™-MDS "Crosswalk". Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78(1):48-54, January, 1997.