Predicting patient scores between the functional independence measure and the minimum data set: Development and performance of a FIM-MDS 'crosswalk'

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 48-54

  Williams, Brent C ^a,b,e   Li, Yi ^b   Fries, Brant E ^b,c   Warren, Reg L ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^d Polaris Group   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NURSING HOME; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; REHABILITATION;

EID: 0031022873     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90009-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Fiedler RC, Granger CV, Ottenbacher KJ. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1994. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:125-9.
2. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level Functional Independence Meassure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med 1994;26:115-9.
3. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. Performance profile of the Functional Independence Measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:84-9.
4. Hawes C, Phillips CD, Mor V, Fries BE, Morris JN. MDS data should be used for research. Gerontologist 1992;32:563-4.
5. Williams BC, Fries BE, Foley WJ, Schneider D, Gavazzi M. Activities of daily living and costs in nursing homes. Health Care Financing Review 1994;15:117-35.
6. Morris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR, Hawes C, Phillips C, Mor V, et al. MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. J Gerontol 1994;49:M174-82.
7. Wolk S, Blair T. Trends in medical rehabilitation. Reston (VA): American Rehabilitation Association, 1994.
8. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation FIM Credentialing Examination, Version 4.0. Buffalo (NY): State University of New York at Buffalo, 1994.
9. Hawes C, Morris JN, Phillips CD, Mor V, Fries BE, Nonemaker S. Reliability estimates for the Minimum Data Set for nursing home resident assessment and care screening (MDS). Gerontologist 1995; 35:172-8.
10. Linacre M, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger V, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:127-31.
11. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
12. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.
13. Winer BJ. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
14. SAS Release 6.03. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, 1988.
15. Harada N, Kominski, Sofaer S. Development of a resource-based patient classification scheme for rehabilitation. Inquiry 1993;30:54-63.
16. Stineman M, Escarce J, Goin J, Hamilton B, Granger C, Williams S. A case-mix classification sytem for medical rehabilitation. Med Care 1994;32:366-79.
17. Adamovich BLB. Pitfalls in functional assessment: a comparison of FIM ratings by speech language pathologists and nurses. Neuro Rehab 1992;2(4):42-51.