The Genetic Architecture of House Fly Mating Behavior

Current Topics in Developmental Biology

Volumn 66, Issue , 2005, Pages 189-213

  Meffert, Lisa M ^a   Hagenbuch, Kara L ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HOUSE FLY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION; GENOTYPE; HOUSEFLIES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 24644487364     PISSN: 00702153     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)66006-1     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Andersson M. "Sexual Selection." (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
2. Aragaki D.L.R., and Meffert L.M. A test of how well the repeatability of courtship predicts its heritability. Anim. Behav. 55 (1998) 1141-1150
3. Arnold S.J. Behavioral variation in natural populations I. Phenotypic, genetic and environmental correlations between chemoreceptive responses to prey in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 35 (1981) 489-509
4. Arnold S.J. Behavioral variation in natural populations II. The inheritance of a feeding response in crosses between geographic races of the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 35 (1981) 510-515
5. Aspi J. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophilia montana. J. Hered. 84 (2000) 273-282
6. Aspi J., and Hoikkala A. Laboratory and natural heritabilities of male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana and D. littoralis. J. Hered. 70 (1993) 400-406
7. Aspi J., and Hoikkala A. Male mating success and survival in the field with respect to size and courtship song characters in Drosophila littoralis and D. montana (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Ins. Behav. 8 (2000) 67-87
8. Boake C.R.B. Repeatability: Its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evol. Ecol. 3 (1989) 173-182
9. Boake C.R.B., DeAngelis M.P., and Andreadis D.K. Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) 12442-12445
10. Boake C.R.B., and Hoikkala A. Courtship behaviour and mating success of wild-caught Drosophila silvestris males. Anim. Behav. 49 (1995) 1303-1313
11. Boake C.R.B., and Konigsberg L. Inheritance of male courtship behavior, aggressive success, and body size in Drosophila silvestris. Evolution 52 (1998) 1487-1492
12. Brandes Ch. Estimation of heritability of learning behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera capensis). Behav. Genet. 18 (1988) 119-132
13. Brandes Ch. Genetic differences in learning behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera capensi). Behav. Genet. 21 (1991) 271-294
14. Brewer B.A., Lacy R.C., Foster M.L., and Alaks G. Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peryomyscus mice. J. Hered. 81 (1990) 257-266
15. Brown B.B., and Russell K. Methods correcting multiple testing: Operating characteristics. Stat. Med. 16 (1997) 2511-2528
16. Bruell J.H. Heterotic inheritance of wheel-running in mice. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 58 (1964) 159-163
17. Bryant E.H., and Meffert L.M. Effect of an experimental bottleneck on morphological integration in the housefly. Evolution 42 (1988) 698-707
18. Bult A., and Lynch C.B. Breaking through artificial selection limits of an adaptive behavior in mice and the consequences for correlated responses. Behav. Genet. 30 (2000) 193-206
19. Caldwell R.L., and Hegmann J.P. Heritability of flight duration in the milkweed bug, Lygaeus kalmii. Nature 223 (1969) 91-92
20. Carracedo M.A., Piñeiro R., and Cesares P. Chromosomal substitution analysis of receptivity and sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster females. J. Hered. 75 (1995) 541-546
21. Casares P., Carracedo M.C., San Miguel E., Piñeiro R., and Garcia- Florez L. Male mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster: Differences in genetic architecture and in the relative performance according to female genotype. Behav. Genet. 23 (1993) 349-358
22. Charlesworth B. The effect of synergistic epistasis on the inbreeding load. Genet. Res. 71 (1998) 85-89
23. Charlesworth B., and Charlesworth D. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18 (1987) 237-268
24. Cheverud J.E., and Routman E.J. Epistasis as a source of increased additive genetic variance at population bottlenecks. Evolution 50 (1996) 1042-1051
25. Cohan F.M., Hoffman A.A., and Gayley T.W. A test of the role of epistasis in divergence under uniform selection. Evolution 43 (1989) 766-774
26. Collins R.D., Jang Y., Reinhold K., and Greenfield M.D. Quantitative genetics of ultrasonic advertisement signaling in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Hered. 83 (1999) 644-651
27. Coyne J.A., Barton N.H., and Turelli M. Perspective: A critique of Sewall Wright's shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51 (1997) 643-671
28. Dingle H. Genetic analysis of animal migration. In: Boake C.R.B. (Ed). "Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution" (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 145-164
29. Dohm M.R., Hayes J.P., and Garland Jr. T. Quantitative genetics of sprint running speed and swimming endurance in laboratory house mice (Mus domesticus). Evolution 50 (1996) 1688-1701
30. Endsley M.A., Baker M.D., and Krafsur E.S. Microsatellite loci in the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2 (2002) 72-74
31. Ewing A.W. Genetics and activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia 15 (1967) 330-332
32. Falconer D.S. "Introduction to Quantitative Genetics." (1989), Longman, New York
33. Farr J.A. The inheritance of quantitative fitness traits in guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Pices: Peociliidae). Evolution 37 (1983) 1193-1209
34. Farr J.A., and Peters K. The inheritance of quantitative fitness traits in guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). 2. Tests for inbreeding effects. J. Hered. 52 (1984) 285-296
35. Faugeres A., Petit C., and Thibout E. The components of sexual selection. Evolution 25 (1971) 265-275
36. Fedorowicz G.M., Fry J.D., Anholt R.R.H., and Mackay T.F.C. Epistatic interactions between smell-impaired loci in Drosophilia melanogaster. Genetics 148 (1998) 1885-1891
37. Finley K.D., Taylor B.J., Milstein M., and McKeown M. Dissatisfaction, a gene involved in sex-specific behavior and neural development of Drosophilia melangogaster. Genetics 94 (1997) 913-918
38. Fisher R.A. "The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection." (1958), Dover, New York
39. Frankham R. Inbreeding and extinction: A threshold effect. Cons. Biol. 9 (1995) 792-799
40. Fulker D.W. Mating speed in male Drosophila melanogaster; A psychogenic analysis. Science 153 (1966) 203-205
41. Gatehouse A.G. Migration in the African armyworm, Spodoptera exempta: Genetic determination of migratory capacity and a new synthesis. In: Danthanarayana W. (Ed). "Insect Flight, Dispersal, and Migration" (1986), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 128-144
42. Goodnight C.J. Epistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance. Evolution 42 (1988) 441-454
43. Goodnight C.J., and Wade M.J. The ongoing synthesis: A reply to Coyne, Barton, and Turelli. Evolution 54 (2000) 317-324
44. Gromko M.H. Genetic constraint on the evolution of courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Hered. 58 (1987) 435-441
45. Hansen T.F., and Wagner G.P. Modeling genetic architecture: A multilinear theory of gene interaction. Theor. Pop. Biol. 59 (2001) 61-86
46. Hayman B.I. The separation of epistasis from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Genetica 31 (1960) 133-146
47. Hard J.J., Bradshaw W.E., and Holzapfel C.M. The genetic basis of photoperiodism and its evolutionary divergence among populations of the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Amer. Natur. 142 (1993) 457-473
48. Hedrick A.V. The heritability of mate-attractive traits: A case study on field crickets. In: Boake C.R.B. (Ed). "Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution" (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 228-250
49. Henderson N.D. Genetic analysis of acquisition and retention of a conditioned fear in mice. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 65 (1968) 325-330
50. Henderson N.D. The confounding effects of genetic variables in early experience research: Can we ignore them?. Dev. Psychobiol. 1 (1968) 146-152
51. Hewitt J.K., Fulker D.W., and Hewitt C.A. Genetic architecture of olfactory discriminative avoidance conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. 97 (1983) 52-58
52. Hicks S.K., Hagenbuch K.L., and Meffert L.M. Variable costs of mating, longevity, and starvation resistance in the housefly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Env. Entomol. 33 (2004) 779-786
53. Hill W.G., and Caballero A. Artificial selection experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23 (1992) 287-310
54. Hoffman A.A. Genetic analysis of territory in Drosophila melanogaster. In: Boake C.R.B. (Ed). "Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution" (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 188-205
55. Hunt G.J., Guzman-Novoa E., Fondrk M.K., and Page Jr. R.E. Quantitative trait loci for honey bee stinging behavior and body size. Genetics 148 (1998) 1203-1213
56. Iwasa Y., and Pomiankowski A. Continual changes in mate preferences. Nature 377 (1995) 420-422
57. Jang Y.W., and Greenfield M.D. Quantitative genetics of female choice in an ultrasonic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella: Variation and evolution of performance along multiple dimensions of the male advertisement signal. J. Hered. 84 (2000) 73-80
58. Jia F.-Y., Greenfield M.D., and Collins R.D. Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: Maintenance by genotype X environment interactions. Evolution 54 (2000) 953-967
59. Kaneshiro K.Y. Sexual selection, speciation, and the direction of evolution. Evolution 34 (1980) 437-444
60. Kessler S. The genetics of Drosophila mating behavior. II. The genetic architecture of mating speed in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 62 (1969) 421-433
61. Lande R. Models of speciation and sexual isolation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 78 (1981) 3721-3725
62. Lande R. Risk of population extinction from new deleterious mutations. Evolution 48 (1994) 1460-1469
63. Lande R. Mutation and conservation. Cons. Biol. 9 (1995) 782-791
64. López-Fanjul C., Fernandez A., and Toro M.A. Epistasis and the conversion of non-additive genetic variance at population bottlenecks. Theor. Pop. Biol. 58 (2000) 49-59
65. López-Fanjul C., and Villaverde A. Inbreeding increases genetic variance for viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 43 (1989) 1800-1804
66. Lynch C.B. Evolutionary inferences from genetic analyses of cold adaptation in laboratory and wild populations of the house mouse. In: Boake C.R.B. (Ed). "Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution" (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 278-301
67. Lynch M. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45 (1991) 622-629
68. Lynch M., Connery J., and Bürger R. Mutational meltdowns in sexual populations. Evolution 49 (1995) 1067-1080
69. Lynch M., and Walsh B. "Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits." (1998), Sinauer Associates, Sanderland, MD
70. MacKay T.F.C., Hackett J.B., Lyman R.F., Wayne M.L., and Anholt R.R.H. Quantitative genetic variation of odor-guided behavior in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144 (1996) 727-735
71. Manning A. The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 9 (1961) 89-92
72. Markow T.A. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 35 (1981) 1022-1026
73. McGuire T.R., and Tully T. Characterization of genes involved with classical conditioning that produce differences between bidirectionally selected strains of the blow fly Phormia regina. Behav. Genet. 17 (1987) 97-107
74. Meffert L.M. Bottleneck effects on genetic variance for courtship repertoire. Genetics 139 (1995) 365-374
75. Meffert L.M. How speciation experiments relate to conservation biology. BioScience 49 (1999) 701-715
76. Meffert L.M. The evolutionary potential of morphology and mating behavior: The role of epistasis in bottlenecked populations. In: Wolf J.B., Brodie E.D., and Wade M.J. (Eds). "Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process" (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K 177-193
77. Meffert L.M., and Bryant E.H. Mating propensity and courtship behavior in serially bottlenecked lines of the housefly. Evolution 45 (1991) 293-306
78. Meffert L.M., and Bryant E.H. Divergent ambulatory and grooming behavior in serially bottlenecked lines of the housefly. Evolution 46 (1992) 1399-1407
79. Meffert L.M., Hicks S.K., and Regan J.L. Nonadditive genetic effects in animal behavior. Amer. Natur. 160S (2002) S198-213
80. Meffert L.M., and Regan J.L. A test of speciation via sexual selection on female preferences. Anim. Behav. 64 (2002) 955-965
81. Meffert L.M., Regan J.L., and Brown B.W. Convergent evolution of the mating behaviour of founder-flush populations of the housefly. J. Evol. Biol. 12 (1999) 859-868
82. Nol E., Cheng K., and Nichols C. Heritability and phenotypic correlations of behavior and dominance rank of Japanese quail. Anim. Behav. 52 (1996) 813-820
83. Oliverio A. Genetic variations and heredity in a measure of avoidance learning in mice. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 74 (1971) 390-397
84. Oliverio A., Catellano C., and Messeri P. A genetic analysis of avoidance, maze and wheel running behaviors in the mouse. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 79 (1972) 459-473
85. Park E.-C., and Horvitz H.R. Mutations with dominant effects on the behavior and morphology of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 113 (1986) 821-852
86. Pimentel R.A. "Morphometrics. The Multivariate Analysis of Biological Data." (1979), Kendall{plus 45 degree rule}Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA
87. Polivanov S. Response of Drosophila persimilis to phototactic and geotactic selection. Behav. Genet. 5 (1975) 255-267
88. Price T. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 353 (1998) 251-260
89. Price T., Schluter D., and Heckman N.E. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48 (1993) 187-211
90. Rasmuson B., Rasmuson M., and Nygren J. Genetically controlled differences in behavior between cycling and noncycling populations of field voles (Microtus agrestis). Hereditas 87 (1977) 33-42
91. Regan J.L., Meffert L.M., and Bryant E.H. A direct experimental test of founder-flush effects on the evolutionary potential for assortative mating. J. Evol. Biol. 16 (2003) 302-312
92. Ringo J., and Wood D. Pupation site selection in Drosophila simulans. Behav. Genet. 13 (1983) 17-27
93. Roff D.A., and Mousseau T.A. Quantitative genetics and fitness: Lessons from Drosophila. J. Hered. 58 (1987) 103-118
94. Sacca G. Comparative bionomics of the genus. Musca Ann. Rev. Entomol. 9 (1964) 341-358
95. Sewell D., Burnet B., and Connolly K. Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. Camb. 24 (1975) 163-173
96. Schultz S., and Lynch M. Mutation and extinction: The role of variable mutational effects, synergistic epistasis, beneficial mutations, and degree of outcrossing. Evolution 51 (1997) 1363-1371
97. Sharp P.M. The effect of inbreeding on competitive male-mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106 (1984) 601-612
98. Shaw F.H., Shaw R.G., Wilkinson G.S., and Turelli M. Changes in genetic variances and covariances: G whiz!. Evolution 49 (1995) 1260-1267
99. Siegel R.W., and Hall J.C. Conditioned responses in courtship of normal and mutant. Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 76 (1979) 3430-3434
100. Stevens L. Genetic analysis of cannibalism behavior in Tribolium flour beetles. In: Boake C.R.B. (Ed). "Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution" (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 206-227
101. Taylor C.E. Differences in mating propensities: Some models for examining the genetic consequences. Behav. Genet. 5 (1975) 381-393
102. Thornhill N.W. "The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives." (1993), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
103. Tobin E.N., and Stoffolano Jr. J.G. The courtship of Musca species found in North America. 1. The House Fly, Musca domestica. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 66 (1978) 1249-1257
104. Travis J. Size-dependent behavioral variation and its genetic control within and among populations. In: Boake C.R.B. (Ed). "Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution" (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 165-187
105. Via S., and Lande R. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39 (1985) 505-523
106. Via S., and Lande R. Evolution of genetic variability in a spatially heterogeneous environment: Effects of genotype- environment interaction. Genet. Res. Camb. 49 (1987) 147-156
107. Wang D.L., Zhu J., Li Z.K., and Paterson A.H. Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL X environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 (1999) 1255-1264
108. Weber K.E. Large genetic change at small fitness cost in large populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for wind tunnel flight: Rethinking fitness surfaces. Genetics 144 (1996) 205-213
109. Whitlock M.C., Phillips P.C., and Wade M.J. Gene interaction affects the additive genetic variance in subdivided populations with migration and extinction. Evolution 47 (1993) 1758-1769
110. Willis J.H., and Orr H.A. Increased heritable variation following population bottlenecks: The role of dominance. Evolution 47 (1993) 949-956
111. In: Wolf J.B., Brodie E.D., and Wade M.J. (Eds). "Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process." (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K
112. Wolf J.B., Brodie III E.D., Cheverud J.M., Moore A.J., and Wade M.J. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Tr. Ecol. Evol. 13 (1998) 64-69
113. Wright S. "Evolution and the Genetics of Populations." (1969), University of Chicago Press, Chicago