Epistasis and the conversion of non-additive to additive genetic variance at population bottlenecks

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 49-59

  López Fanjul, Carlos ^a   Fernández, Almudena ^b   Toro, Miguel A ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; POPULATION BOTTLENECK;

EID: 0342954964     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1470     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Avery P. J., Hill W. G. Variance in quantitative traits due to linked dominant genes and variance in heterozygosity in small populations. Genetics. 91:1979;817-844.
2. Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:1987;237-268.
3. Cheverud J. M., Routman E. J. Epistasis as a source of increased additive genetic variance at population bottlenecks. Evolution. 50:1996;1042-1051.
4. Cheverud J. M., Vaughn T. T., Pletscher L. S., King-Ellison K., Bailiff J., Adams E., Erickson C., Bonislawski A. Epistasis and the evolution of additive genetic variance in populations that pass through a bottleneck. Evolution. 53:1999;1009-1018.
5. Crow J. F., Kimura M. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. 1970;Harper & Row, New York.
6. Falconer D. S., Mackay T. F. C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 1996;Longman, New York.
7. Fowler K., Whitlock M. C. The distribution of phenotypic variance with inbreeding. Evolution. 53:1999;1143-1156.
8. Goodnight C. Epistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance. Evolution. 42:1988;441-454.
9. López-Fanjul C., Fernández A., Toro M. A. The role of epistasis in the increase in the additive genetic variance after population bottlenecks. Genet. Res. 73:1999;45-59.
10. Phillips P. C. The language of gene interaction. Genetics. 149:1998;1167-1171.
11. Robertson A. The effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics. 37:1952;189-207.
12. Santiago E., Albornoz J., Domínguez A., Toro M. A., López-Fanjul C. The distribution of effects of spontaneous mutations on quantitative traits and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 132:1992;771-781.
13. Tachida H., Cockerham C. C. Effects of identity disequilibrium and linkage on quantitative variation in finite populations. Genet. Res. 53:1989;63-70.
14. Tiwari H. K., Elston R. C. Restrictions on components of variance for epistatic models. Theor. Pop. Biol. 54:1998;161-174.
15. Wade M., Goodnight C. Perspective: The theories of Fisher and Wright in the context of metapopulations: When nature does many small experiments. Evolution. 52:1998;1537-1556.
16. Wang J., Caballero A., Hill W. G. The effect of linkage disequilibrium and deviation from Hardy-Weinberg proportions on the changes in genetic variance with bottlenecking. Heredity. 81:1998;174-186.
17. Wang J., Caballero A., Keightley P. D., Hill W. G. Bottleneck effect on genetic variance: Theoretical investigation of the role of dominance. Genetics. 150:1999;435-447.
18. Weber K., Eisman R., Morey L., Patty A., Sparks J., Tausek M., Zeng Z-B. An analysis of polygenes affecting wing shape on chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 153:1999;773-786.
19. Whitlock M. C., Fowler K. The changes in genetic and environmental variance with inbreeding. Genetics. 123:1999;345-353.
20. Willis J. H., Orr H. A. Increased heritable variation following population bottlenecks: The role of dominance. Evolution. 47:1993;949-957.