Inquiry in intercultural and development communication

Journal of Communication

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 554-577

  Kim, Young Yun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 24644434319     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joc/55.3.554     Document Type: Review

References (114)

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
2. Beltran, L. R. S (1976) Alien premises, objects, and methods in Latin American communication research. In E. M. Rogers (Ed.), Communication and development: Critical perspectives (pp. 15-42). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Berry, J. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (pp. 9-25) Washington, DC: Westview Press.
4. Berry, J. (1990). Psychology of acculturation: Understanding individuals moving between cultures. In R. Brislin (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 232-253). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Boekestijn, C. (1988). Intercultural migration and the development of personal identity: The dilemma between identity maintenance and cultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14, 387-404.
6. Braman, S. (2003). From the modern to the postmodern: The future of global communications theory and research in pandemonic age. In B. Mody (Ed.), International and development communication: A 21st-century perspective (pp. 109-123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Braman, S., Shah, H., & Fair, J. E. (2001). We are all natives now: An overview of international and development communication research. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24, 159-186. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Broome, B. (1990). "Palevome": Foundations of struggle and conflict in Greek interpersonal communication. Southern Journal of Communication, 55, 260-275.
9. Burgoon, J. (1995) Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory. In R. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 194-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Burgoon, J., Allspach, L., & Miczo, N. (1997, February). Needs, expectancies, goals and initial interaction: A view from interaction adaptation theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Monterey, CA.
11. Burgoon, J., Ebesu, A., White, C., Koch, P., Alvaro, E., & Kikuchi, T. (1998). The multiple faces of interaction adaptation. In M. Palmer & G. Barnett (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 14, pp. 191-220). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
12. Burgoon, J., Stern, L., & Dillman, L. (1995) Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Carbaugh, D. (1993) Competence as cultural pragmatics: Reflections on some Soviet and American encounters. In R. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 168-183). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Chang, H. (1998). The "well-defined" is "ambiguous" - Indeterminacy in Chinese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 535-556.
15. Chen, G., & Starosta, W. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19, 353-383. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Chen, L. (1997, December). Verbal adaptive strategies in U.S. American dyadic interactions with U.S. American or East-Asian partners. Communication Monographs, 64, 302-323.
17. Collier, M. (1998). Researching cultural identity: Reconciling interpretive and postcolonial perspectives. In D. Tanno & A. Gonzalez (Eds.), Communication and identity across cultures (pp. 122-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Collier, M., & Bornman, E. (1999). Core symbols in South African intercultural friendships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 133-156.
19. Collier, M., & Thomas, M. (1988). Cultural identity: An interpretive perspective. In Y. Y. Kim & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 99-120). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Cupach, W, & Imahori, T. (1993) Identity management theory: Communication competence in intercultural episodes and relationships. In R. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 112-131). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Dasgupta, S. (1983) Indian immigrants: The evolution of an ethnic group (Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 1938A.
22. Diaz Bordenave, J. (1976) Communication of agricultural innovations in Latin America: The need for new models. In E. M. Rogers (Ed.), Communication and development: Critical perspectives (pp. 43-62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Dodd, C. (1998). Dynamics of intercultural communication (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
24. Ellingsworth, H. (1977) Conceptualizing intercultural communication. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2, 345-350. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
25. Ellingsworth, H. (1988). A theory of adaptation in intercultural dyads. In Y. Kim & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 259-279). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Fair, J. E., & Shah, H. (1997). Continuities and discontinuities in communication and development research since 1958. Journal of International Communication, 46(2), 3-23.
27. Fitch, K. (1998). Speaking relationally: Culture, communication, and interpersonal connection. New York: Guilford Press.
28. Gallois, S., Giles, H., Jones, E., Cargile, A., & Ota, H. (1995). Accommodating intercultural encounters: Elaborations and extensions. In R. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 115-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Gao, G. (1998). "Don't take my word for it": Understanding Chinese speaking practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 163-186.
30. Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J., & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10, 13-48. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Gonzalez, A., Houston, M., & Chen, V. (1994). Our voices: Essays in culture, ethnicity, and communication: An intercultural anthology. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
32. Gudykunst, W. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory. In R. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 8-58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Gudykunst, W. (2003) Issues in cross-cultural communication research. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Cross-cultural and intercultural communication (pp. 149-161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Gudykunst, W., & Lee, C. (2003) Cross-cultural communication theories. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Cross-cultural and intercultural communication (pp 7-33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Gudykunst, W., Gao, G., Schmidt, K., Nishida, T., Bond, M., et al. (1992). The influence of individualism-collectivism on communication in ingroup and outgroup relationships. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 196-213.
36. Gudykunst, W., & Kim, Y. (2003) Communicating with strangers (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. Gudykunst, W., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and interpersonal communication, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Hall, B. (1994). Understanding intercultural conflict through an analysis of kernel images and rhetorical visions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 62-86.
39. Hall, E. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.
40. Hasegawa, T., & Gudykunst, W. (1998). Silence in Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 668-684.
41. Hecht, M. (Ed.). (1998). Communicating prejudice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Hecht, M., Collier, M., & Ribeau, S. (1993). African American communication: Ethnic identity and cultural interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Hedge, R. (1998). Swinging the trapeze: The negotiation of identity among Asian Indian immigrant women in the United States. In D. Tanno & A. Gonzalez (Eds.), Communication and identity across cultures (pp 34-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45. Hubbert, K., Gudykunst, W., & Guerrero, S. (1999). Intergroup communication over time. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 13-46.
46. Huesca, R. (2003). Participatory approaches to communication for development. In B. Mody (Ed.), International and development communication: A 21st-century perspective (pp. 209-226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Hutnik, N., & Bhola, P. (1994, July). Self-categorization and response to threat. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, Brisbane, Queens, Australia.
48. Jacobson, T. L., & Storey, J. D. (2004). Development communication and participation: Applying Habermas to a case study of population programs in Nepal. Communication Theory, 14, 99-121.
49. Kim, M. S. (1993). Culture-based interactive constraints in explaining intercultural strategic competence. In R. Wiseman & J. Kolene (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 132-150). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. Kim, Y. Y. (1977). Communication patterns of foreign immigrants in the process of acculturation. Human Communication Research, 4, 66-77.
51. Kim, Y. Y (1988). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
52. Kim, Y. Y. (1991). Intercultural communication competence: A systems view. In S. Ting-Toomey & F. Korzenny (Eds.), Cross-cultural interpersonal communication (pp. 259-275). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53. Kim, Y. Y. (1995a). Interethnic communication: The context and the behavior. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17, 511-538. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Kim, Y. Y. (1995b). Identity development: From cultural to intercultural. In H. Mokros (Ed.), Information and behavior, Vol. 5. Interaction and identity (pp 347-369). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
55. Kim, Y. Y. (1997). The context-behavior interface in interethnic communication. In J. Owen (Ed.), Context and communication behavior (pp. 261-291). Reno, NV: Context Press.
56. Kim, Y. Y. (1999). Unum and Pluribus: Ideological underpinnings of interethnic communication in the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 591-611.
57. Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Kim, Y. Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2004). The role of the host environment in cross-cultural adaptation: A comparative analysis of Korean expatriates in the United States and their American counterparts in South Korea. Asian Communication Research, 1, 5-25.
59. Kim, Y. Y., Lujan, P., & Dixon, L. (1998). "I can walk both ways": Identity integration of American Indians in Oklahoma. Human Communication Research, 25, 252-274.
60. Kim, Y. Y., Kim, Y. S., Duty, D., & Yoshitake, M. (2002, November). Patterns of interethnic communication among university students: A survey. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
61. Kim, Y. Y., McClure, R. R., Ogawa, N., & Kim, Y. S. (2003, May). Patterns of interethnic communication among adult Americans: A triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
62. Kimberly, N., Gudykunst, W., & Guerrero, S. (1999). Intergroup communication over time. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(4), 1-34.
63. Kluckhohn, F., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. New York: Row & Peterson.
64. Kochman, T. (1990). Forcefields in black and white communication. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact (pp. 193-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Kotler, P. (1984). Social marketing of health behavior. In L. W. Frederiksen, L. J. Solomon, & K. A. Brehony (Eds.), Marketing health behavior (pp. 23-39). New York: Plenum.
66. Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press.
67. McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. New York: New American Library.
68. Martin, J., Krizek, R., Nakayama, T., & Bradford, L. (1996). Exploring Whiteness: A study of self labels for white Americans. Communication Quarterly, 44, 125-144.
69. Maruyama, M. (1998). Cross-cultural adaptation and host environment: A study of international students in Japan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
70. McDowell, S. (2003). Theory and research in international communication: A historical and institutional account. In B. Mody (Ed.), International and development communication: A 21st-century perspective (pp 5-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. McPhail, M. (1998). Passionate intensity: Louis Farrakhan and the fallacies of racial reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84, 416-429.
72. McPhail, T. (1989). Inquiry in international communication. In M. Asante & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 47-66). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Melkote, S. (2003). Theories of development communication. In B. Mody (Ed.), International and development communication: A 21st-century perspective (pp. 129-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Milstein, T. J. (2003, May). Transformation abroad: Communication self-efficacy via sojourning. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
75. Mody, B. (Ed.). (2003). International and development communication: A 21st-century perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76. Mowlana, H., & Wilson, L. J. (1990). The passing of modernity: Communication and the transformation of society. New York: Longman.
77. Oetzel, J. (1998). Culturally homogeneous and heterogeneous groups: Explaining communication processes through individualism-collectivism and self-construal. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 135-161.
78. Orbe, M. (1997). Constructing co-cultural theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79. Papa, M., Auwal, M., & Singhal, A. (1995). Dialectic of control and emancipation in organizing for social change: A multitheoretic study of the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh. Communication Theory, 5, 189-223.
80. Papa, M., Auwal, M., & Singhal, A. (1997). Organizing for social change within concertive control systems: Member identification, empowerment, and the masking of discipline. Communication Monographs, 64, 219-250.
81. Papa, M., Singhal, A., Law, S., Pant, S., Sood, S., Rogers, E. M., et al. (2000). Entertainment-education and social change: An analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and paradoxical communication. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 31-55.
82. Petronio, S., Ellemers, N., Giles, H., & Gallois, C. (1998). (Mis)communicating across boundaries: Interpersonal and intergroup considerations. Communication Research, 25, 571-595.
83. Philipsen, G. (1990). Speaking "like a man" in Teamsterville: Culture patterns and role enactment in an urban neighborhood. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact (pp. 11-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
84. Philipsen, G. (2003) Cultural communication. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Cross-cultural and intercultural communication (pp 35-51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
85. Piotrow, P., Kincaid, D., Rimon, J., II, & Rinehart, W. (1997). Health communication: Lessons from family planning and reproductive health. Westport, CT: Praeger.
86. Rogers, E. M. (1962). The diffusion of innovations (1st ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
87. Rogers, E. M. (1995). The diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
88. Rogers, E. M. (1989). Inquiry in development communication. In M. Asante & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 67-86). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
89. Rogers, E. M., & Hart, W. (2003). Looking back and looking forward. In B. Mody (Ed.), International and development communication: A 21st-century perspective (pp. 261-274). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90. Rogers, E. M. (with Shoemaker, F. F.). (1971). Communication of innovations: Across-cultural approach. New York: Free Press.
91. Rossides, D. (1976). The American class system: An introduction to social stratification. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
92. Sarbaugh, L. (1988). Intercultural communication. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
93. Schramm, W. (1964). Mass media and national development: The role of information in the developing countries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
94. Singelis, T., & Brown, W. (1995) Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21, 354-389.
95. Singh, J. P. (2003) Communication technology and development. In B. Mody (Ed.), International and development communication: A 21st-century perspective (pp. 189-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
96. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
97. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (2003) India's information revolution Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
98. Smith, P., Dugan, S., Peterson, M., & Leung, K. (1998). Individualism: Collectivism and the handling of disagreement. A 23 country study [sic]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 351-367.
99. Smitherman-Donaldson, G., & van Dijk, T. (1988). Discourse and discrimination. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
100. Snyder, L. B. (2003). Development communication campaigns. In B. Mody (Ed.), International and development communication: A 21st- century perspective (pp. 167-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
101. Stokes, R., & Hewitt, J. (1976) Aligning actions. American Sociological Review, 41, 838-849.
102. Szapocznik, J., & Kurines, W. (1980). Acculturation, biculturalism and adjustment among Cuban Americans. In A. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation (pp. 139-159). Boulder, CO: Westview.
103. Tajfel, H. (1982). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
104. Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213-235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
105. Ting-Toomey, S. (1993) Communicative resourcefulness: An identity negotiation perspective. In R. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 72-111). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
106. Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 187-225.
107. Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
108. Triandis, H., Leung, K., Villareal, M., & Clark, F. (1985). Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies. Journal of Research in Personality, 19 395-415.
109. Tsuda, Y. (1986). Language inequality and distortion in intercultural communication: A critical theory approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
110. Thussu, D. K. (2000). International communication: Continuity and change. New York: Oxford University Press.
111. Van Dijk, T. (1989). Structures of discourse and structures of power. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 12, 18-59. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
112. Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985). Native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
113. Wieder, L., & Pratt, S. (1990). On being a recognizable Indian among Indians. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact (pp. 45-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
114. Young, R. (1996). Intercultural communication: Pragmatics, genealogy, deconstruction. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.