Comparison of enzymatic and non-enzymatic nitroethane anion formation: Thermodynamics and contribution of tunneling

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 20, 2004, Pages 6244-6245

  Valley, Michael P ^a   Fitzpatrick, Paul F ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ALDEHYDE; ALKANE; ANION; CARBONIC ACID; DEUTERIUM; ISOTOPE; KETONE; NITRITE; NITROETHANE; PHOSPHATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; HYDROGEN BOND; KINETICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THERMODYNAMICS;

ACETATES; ANIONS; ASPARTIC ACID; CATALYSIS; DEUTERIUM; DIOXYGENASES; ENZYMES; ETHANE; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; KINETICS; NITROPARAFFINS; OXYGENASES; PHOSPHATES; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 2442661476     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0484606     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wolfenden, R. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 1976, 5, 271-306.
2. Wolfenden, R.; Snider, M.; Ridgway, C.; Miller, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7419-7420.
3. Cha, Y.; Murray, C. J.; Klinman, J. P. Science 1989, 1325, 1325-1330.
4. Jonsson, T.; Edmondson, D. E.; Klinman, J. P. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 14871-14878.
5. Kohen, A.; Klinman, J. P. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 191-198.
6. Chowdhury, S.; Banerjee, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5417-5418.
7. Francisco, W. A.; Knapp, M. J.; Blackburn, N. J.; Klinman, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8194-8195.
8. Sutcliffe, M. J.; Scrutton, N. S. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 3096-3102.
9. Doll, K. M.; Bender, B. R.; Finke, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10877-10884.
10. Garcia-Viloca, M.; Gao, J.; Karplus, M.; Truhlar, D. G. Science 2004, 303, 186-195.
11. Kido, T.; Hashizume, K.; Soda, K. J. Bacteriol. 1978, 133, 53-58.
12. Gadda, G.; Edmondson, R. D.; Russel, D. H.; Fitzpatrick, P. F. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 5563-5570.
13. Valley, M. P.; Fitzpatrick, P. F. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 5850-5856.
14. Valley, M. P.; Fitzpatrick, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 23, 8738-8739.
15. Bernasconi, C. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 9-16.
16. Bernasconi, C. F. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1992, 27, 119-238.
17. Nielsen, A. T. In The Chemistry of the Nitro and Nitroso Groups; Feuer, H., Ed.; Interscience: New York, 1969; pp 349-486.
18. Gadda, G.; Fitzpatrick, P. F. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 1406-1410.
19. Gadda, G.; Fitzpatrick, P. F. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1999, 363, 309-313.
20. Gadda, G.; Choe, D. Y.; Fitzpatrick, P. F. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 382, 138-144.
21. Hand, E. S.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 6221-6230. The triiodide association constant at different temperatures was determined from published values.22,23 Because the background consumption of iodine upon extrapolation to zero acetate was negligible, the second-order rate constants for the acetate reaction were determined at different temperatures by using a single concentration of acetate. The second-order rate constants for the phosphate reaction were determined from measurements at three different concentrations of phosphate to account for the nonzero intercept at the higher pH used for this reaction.
22. Jones, G.; Kaplan, B. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1928, 50, 1845-1864.
23. Davies, M.; Gwynne, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 2748-2752.
24. Daubner, S. C.; Gadda, G.; Valley, M. P.; Fitzpatrick, P. F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 2702-2707.
25. m value for protiated or deuterated nitroethane (2.3 and 14 mM, respectively).
26. Radzicka, A.; Wolfenden, R. Science 1995, 267, 90-93.
27. Kohen, A.; Klinman, J. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 397-404.
28. Bell, R. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1974, 513-544.
29. Doll, K. M.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 4849-4856.
30. Keefe, J. R.; Munderloh, N. H. J. C. S. Chem. Commun. 1974, 17-18.
31. The isotope effects in Figure 2C were determined with three different preparations of enzyme, each of which gave slightly different values for the isotope effect at any given temperature; the reason for the variation is not clear. The three data sets were analyzed separately; the values in Table 1 are the averages from the three indvidual preparations, with the errors from the individual analyses propagated.
32. Kohen, A. Prog. Kinet. Mech. 2003, 28, 119-156.