No shortcuts to preparing good teachers

Educational Leadership

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 32-36

  Berry, Barnett ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035595737     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adams, R. D., Hutchinson, S., & Martray, C. (1980, April). A developmental study of teacher concerns across time. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
2. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in teacher quality. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
3. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
4. Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. (in press). Does teacher licensure matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
5. Feistritzer, E. C. (2000). Alternative teacher licensure. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
6. Glassberg, S. (1980, April). A view of the beginning teacher from a developmental perspective. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
7. Gomez, D. L., & Grobe, R. P. (1990, April). Three years of alternative certification in Dallas: Where are we? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
8. Goodnough, A. (2000, November 22). Winnowing process begins for novice teachers. New York Times, p. B9.
9. Guyton, E., & Farokhi, E. (1987). Relationships among academic performance, basic skills, and subject matter knowledge and teaching skills of teacher education graduates. Joumal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 37-42.
10. Hersch, P. (1998). A tribe apart. New York: Ballantine.
11. Monk, D. H., & King, J. A. (1994). Multilevel teacher resource effects in pupil performance in secondary mathematics and science: The case of teacher subject matter preparation. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Choices and consequences: Contemporary policy issues in education (pp. 29-58). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
12. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
13. Peyser, A. (2000, October 30). Ed Board in no class act for new teachers. New York Post, p. 40.
14. Shen, J. (1997). Has alternative licensure policy materialized its promise? A comparison between traditionally and alternatively certified teachers in public schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 276-283.
15. Shields, P. M., Esch, C. E., Humphrey, D. C., Riehl, L. M., Tiffany-Morales, J. D., & Young, V. M. (2000). The status of the teaching profession, 2000: An update to the Teaching and California's Future task force. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
16. Stoddart, T. (1990). Los Angeles unified school district intern program: Recruiting and preparing teachers for the urban context. Peabody Journal of Education, 26, 29-48.
17. Taylor, J. K., & Dale, R. (1971). A survey of teachers in the first year of service. Bristol, England: University of Bristol, Institute of Education.