European preferences for beef steak attributes

Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 367-380

  Tonsor, Glynn T ^a   Schroeder, Ted C ^a   Fox, John A ^a   Biere, Arlo ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beef; Choice experiment; Country of origin; Genetically modified; Hormones; Preference heterogeneity; Random parameters; Source verification

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044526550     PISSN: 10685502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ahearn, R. "U.S.-European Union Trade Relations: Issues and Policy Challenges." Congressional Research Service Issue Brief for Congress. Order Code IB10087. Washington, DC, 4 March 2002.
2. Alfnes, F. "Stated Preferences for Imported and Hormone-Treated Beef: Application of a Mixed Logit Model." Eur. Rev. Agr. Econ. 31(2004):19-37.
3. Alfnes, F., and K. Rickertsen. "European Consumers' Willingness to Pay for U.S. Beef in Experimental Auction Markets." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 85(2003):396-405.
4. Bureau, J., S. Marette, and A. Schiavina. "Non-Tariff Trade Barriers and Consumers' Information: The Case of the EU-US Trade Dispute over Beef." Eur. Rev. Agr. Econ. 25(1998):437-462.
5. Burton, M., D. Rigby, T. Young, and S. James. "Consumer Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Organisms in Food in the U.K." Eur. Rev. Agr. Econ. 28(2001):479-498.
6. Cummings, R. G., G. W. Harrison, and E. E. Rutström. "Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?" Amer. Econ. Rev. 85(1995):260-266.
7. Dickinson, D. L., and D. Bailey. "Meat Traceability: Are U.S. Consumers Willing to Pay for It?" J. Agr. and Resour. Econ. 27(2002):348-364.
8. European Union website. "Facts and Figures on the European Union and the United States." Online. Available at http://www.eurunion.org/profile/ facts.htm. [Accessed August 12, 2004.]
9. Eurostat, Statistical Office of the European Communities. European national demographics data. Online. Available at http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/ eurostat. [Accessed August 22, 2004.]
10. Fox, J. A., J. F. Shogren, D. J. Hayes, and J. B. Kliebenstein. "CVM-X: Calibrating Contingent Values with Experimental Auction Markets." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 80(1998):455-465.
11. Frewer, L., A. Kole, S. Van De Kroon, and C. Lauwere. "Consumer Attitudes Towards the Development of Animal-Friendly Husbandry Systems." J. Agr. and Environ. Ethics (2005, forthcoming).
12. Frewer, L., E. Risvik, and H. Schifferstein. Food, People, and Society - A European Perspective of Consumers' Food Choices. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
13. Gaskell, G., M. Bauer, J. Duran, and N. Allum. "Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S." Science 285(1999):384-388.
14. Grannis, J., and D. D. Thilmany. "Marketing Natural Pork: An Empirical Analysis of Consumers in the Mountain Region." Agribus.: An Internat. J. 18(2002):475-489.
15. Greene, W. H. NLOGIT Version 3.0 Reference Guide. Bellport, NY: Econometric Software, Inc., 2002.
16. Hamstra, A. Consumer Acceptance Model for Food Biotechology - Final Report. The Hague: The SWOKA Institute, 1995.
17. Harrison, R., S. Boccaletti, and L. House. "Comparison of the Risk Perceptions of Italian and United States Consumers for GMO Foods." Paper presented at the 14th International Food and Agribusiness Management Association Forum, Montreux, Switzerland, 12-15 June 2004.
18. House, L., J. Lusk, S. Jaeger, W. Traill, M. Moore, C. Valli, B. Morrow, and W. Yee. "Objective and Subjective Knowledge: Impacts on Consumer Demand for Genetically Modified Foods in the United States and the European Union." AgBioForum 7(2004):113-123.
19. Krinsky, I., and A. Robb. "On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities." Rev. Econ. and Statis. 64(1986):715-719.
20. Kuhfeld, W. F., R. D. Tobias, and M. Garratt. "Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications." J. Marketing Res. 31(1994):545-557.
21. List, J. A., and C. A. Gallet. "What Experimental Protocols Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?" Environ. and Resour. Econ. 20(2001):241-254.
22. List, J. A., and J. F. Shogren. "Calibration of the Differences Between Actual and Hypothetical Valuations in a Field Experiment." J. Econ. Behavior and Organization 37(1998):193-205.
23. Lusk, J., J. Roosen, and J. Fox. "Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 85(2003):16-29.
24. Lusk, J. L., and T. C. Schroeder. "Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 86(2004):467-482.
25. McCluskey, J. J., K. M. Grimsrud, H. Ouchi, and T. I. Wahl. "Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Food Products in Japan." Agr. and Resour. Econ. Rev. 32(2003):222-231.
26. Misra, S., D. Grotegut, and K. Clem. "Consumer Attitudes Toward Recombinant Porcine Somatotropin." Agribus.: An Internat. J. 13(1997):11-20.
27. Misra, S. K., C. L. Huang, and S. L. Ott. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Pesticide-Free Fresh Produce." West. J. Agr. Econ. 16(1991):218-227.
28. Nahuelhual, L., M. L. Loureiro, and J. Loomis. "Using Random Parameters to Account for Heterogeneous Preferences in Contingent Valuation of Public Open Space." J. Agr. and Resour. Econ. 29,3(2004):537-552.
29. Revelt, D., and K. Train. "Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level." Rev. Econ. and Statis. 80(1998):647-657.
30. Roosen, J. "Marketing of Safe Food Through Labeling." J. Food Distribution Res. 34(2003):77-82.
31. Roosen, J., J. L. Lusk, and J. A. Fox. "Consumer Demand for and Attitudes Toward Alternative Beef Labeling Strategies in France, Germany, and the UK." Agribus.: An Internat. J. 19(2003):77-90.
32. Swait, J., and J. Louviere. "The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models." J. Marketing Res. 30(1993):305-314.
33. Train, K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2003.