Configuring who does what in watershed management: The Massachusetts Watershed Initiative

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 565-577

  Michaels, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING; WATERSHED;

MASSACHUSETTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033367441     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01986.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adler, R. W. (1995, Fall). Addressing barriers to watershed protection. Environmental Law 25, 973-1106.
2. Cohen, N. H. (1993). The public and its rivers: The influence of watershed associations in river planning and management in Massachusetts. Thesis submitted to the Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
3. Cortner, H., & Moote, M. (1994). Trends and issues in land and water resources management: Setting the agenda for change. Environmental Management, 18(2), 167-174.
4. Cox, W. E. (1997). Evolution of the Safe Drinking Water Act: A search for effective quality assurance strategies and workable concepts of federalism. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 21(Winter), 69-173.
5. Coxe, T. (1996, June 9-12). Speech presented at the Watershed '96 conference. Baltimore, MD.
6. Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Environmental Law Enforcement. (1995, Fall). The Massachusetts Watershed Initiative: Form and function. Massachusetts Riverways Newsletter, pp. 1-3.
7. Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Environmental Law Enforcement. (1997a, Spring). The Massachusetts Watershed Initiative: Retooling and revenues. Massachusetts Riverways Newsletter, pp. 2-4.
8. Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Environmental Law Enforcement. (1997b, Spring). Partnership successes: Working with the watershed initiative. Massachusetts Riverways Newsletter, pp. 8-11.
9. Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Environmental Law Enforcement. (1997c, Spring). News from the watershed. Massachusetts Riverways Newsletter, pp. 12-17.
10. DeShazo, R. (1996, Spring). Subdividing a watershed for action. Watershed Events: What's Happening in the States?, pp. 2-3.
11. DeShazo, R., & Garrigan, P. (1996). Lessons learned in subwatersheds of the Merrimack River Watershed: The Nashua, Souhegan, and Stony Brook Watersheds. Boston, MA: Merrimack River Initiative.
12. Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F.,. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. The Columbia Law Review 98(2), 267-473.
13. Duane, T. P. (1997). Community participation in ecosystem management. Ecology Law Quarterly 24(4), 771-797.
14. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. (1996, June). Watershed approach framework. EPA840-S-96-001. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
15. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. (1997a). Watershed progress: Massachusetts' approach. EPA840-F-96-004. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
16. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. (1997b). Top 10 watershed lessons learned. EPA840-F-97-001. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
17. Executive Office of Environmental Affairs. (1993). Summary proceedings and consensus points of the December 7, 1993 Watershed Forum. Boston, MA: Executive Office of Environmental Affairs.
18. Executive Office of Environmental Affairs. (1997). The Massachusetts Watershed Initiative. Boston, MA: Executive Office of Environmental Affairs.
19. Flatt, V. B. (1997). A dirty river runs through it (the failure of enforcement in the Clean Water Act). Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 25(Fall), 1-45.
20. Flynn, K. C., & Williams, T. (1994). Watershed management enters the mainstream. Water Environment & Technology, 6(7), 36-40.
21. Geltman, E. G., & Skroback, A. E. (1998). Reinventing the EPA to conform with the new American environmentality. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 23(1), 1-56.
22. Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., & Light, S. S. (Eds.). (1995). Barriers & bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
23. Hays, S. P. (1996, Spring). The future of environmental regulation. The Journal of Law and Commerce, 15, 549-596.
24. Heclo, H. (1974). Social policy in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Hill, J. (1995). Effective implementation of watershed management. Thesis submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
26. John, D. (1994). Civic environmentalism. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
27. Kennedy, L. E., O'Shea, L. K., Dunn, W.H., Jr., & LeVangie, D. (1995). The Neponset River watershed 1994 resource assessment report. North Grafton, MA: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Watershed Management.
28. Kimball, J. C. (1996a). Adopt a stream shoreline survey: A stream team monitoring project leaders'' manual (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Riverways Program, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Environmental Law Enforcement.
29. Kimball, J. C. (1996b). Incorporating stewardship in your monitoring program. In Environmental Protection Agency, Proceedings of the Fifth National Volunteer Monitoring Conference: Promoting watershed stewardship (pp. 20-21). EPA 841-R-97-007. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
30. Kraft, M. E. (1996). Environmental policy and politics. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
31. Lazarus, R. J. (1992). Debunking environmental feudalism: Promoting the individual through the collective pursuit of environmental quality. Iowa Law Review, 77(July), 1739-1774.
32. Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and gyroscope. Washington, DC: Island Press.
33. Mantell, M. A., Harper, S. P., & Propst, L. (1990). Creating successful communities: A guidebook to growth management strategies. Washington, DC: Island Press.
34. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Massachusetts Clean Water Council. (1997). The state of the waters in Massachusetts: Assessing progress and setting priorities. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Clean Water Council.
36. Michaels, S., & Furuseth, O. J. (1997). Innovation in environmental policy: The National Environmental Policy Act of the U.S. and the Resource Management Act of New Zealand. The Environmentalist, 17(3), 181-190.
37. Nelson, B. (1984). Making an issue of child abuse. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
38. Neponset River Watershed Association. (1997, October-November). News from the Neponset. Canton, MA: Neponset River Watershed Association.
39. Neponset River Watershed Association & Executive Office of Environmental Affairs. (1997). Neponset River watershed basin-wide action plan. Boston, MA: Neponset River Watershed Association & Executive Office of Environmental Affairs.
40. Neponset Team. (1995). Neponset River watershed project: Phase one evaluation. Typewritten, 2 pp. 1-2.
41. Roberts, N. C. (1992). Public entrepreneurship and innovation. Policy Studies Review, 11(1), 55-74.
42. Stewart, K. (1997, October-November). NepRWA 1997 fund drive kicks off. News from the Neponset, p. 1.
43. Thomas, G. B. (1995). The politics of hope: An eclectic vision of the future. In J. P Lester (Ed.), Environmental politics & policy (2nd ed.) (pp. 347-364). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44. Walker, P. A. (1996, March 16). Business's role in the Massachusetts Watershed Initiative. Speech at the 1996 New England Environmental Conference, Boston.
45. Warriner, G. K., Madden, J. J., Lukasik, L., & McSpurren, K. (1996). Public participation in watershed management: A comparative analysis. Canadian Water Resources Journal 21(3) 253-273.
46. Watershed Initiative Steering Committee. (1995, October). The Massachusetts watershed approach and its implementation: Status report. Boston, MA: Watershed Initiative Steering Committee.
47. Williams, E. M., & Ellefson, P. V. (1996). Natural resource partnerships: Factors leading to cooperative success in the management of landscape level ecosystems involving mixed ownership. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.