Differentiating instruction for disabled students in inclusive classrooms

Theory into Practice

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 194-202

  Broderick, Alicia ^a   Mehta Parekh, Heeral ^a   Reid, D Kim ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844489194     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4403_3     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Adelman, H. S., Reyna, C., Collins, R., Onghai, J., & Taylor, S. (1999). Fundamental concerns about policy for addressing barriers to student learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15, 327-349.
2. Aronson, E. (1978). Interdependent interactions and prosocial behavior. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 16-27.
3. Berry, R. A., & Englert, C. S. (1998). Book discussion in the primary grades: Transforming the participation of students with disabilities in inclusion context. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Biklen, D. (1993). Communication unbound: How facilitated communication is challenging traditional views of autism and ability/disability. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Biklen, D. (1999). The metaphor of mental retardation: Rethinking ability and disability. In H. Bersani, Jr., (Ed.), Responding to the challenge: Current trends and international issues in developmental disabilities: Essays in honor of Gunnar Dybwad (pp. 35-52). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
6. Biklen, D. (2000). Lessons from the margins, narrating mental retardation: A review essay. Mental Retardation, 38(5), 444-456.
7. Biklen, D., & Cardinal, D. (Eds.). (1997). Contested words, contested science: Unraveling the facilitated communication, controversy. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Borthwick, C., & Crossley, R. (1999). Language and retardation. Psycoloquy, 10(38). Retrieved October 25, 1999 from http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?10.38
9. Brown v. Board of Education (1954). 347 U. S. 483
10. Collins, K. M. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child's struggle to be seen as competent. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Introduction: Multiliteracies: The beginnings of an idea. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 3-8). South Yarra, Australia: Macmillan.
12. Crossley, R. (1994). Facilitated communication training. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Donnellan, A. M. (1984). The criterion of the least dangerous assumption. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 141-150.
14. Dyck, N., & Pemberton, J. B. (2002). A model for making decisions about text adaptations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38(1), 28-35.
15. Fulk, B. M., & King, K. (2001). Classwide peer tutoring at work. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(2), 49-53.
16. Gallagher, D. J. (2004). The importance of constructivism and constructivist pedagogy for disability studies in education. Disability Studies Quarterly, 24(2), 1-15.
17. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P.L. 105-117, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
18. Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1995). A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience, and antiscience. American Psychologist, 50, 750-765.
19. Kalyanpur, M., & Harry, B. (1999). Culture in special, education. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
20. Martin, J. (1998). Literature circles. Thresholds in Education, 24(3), 15-19.
21. Moll, L. C., Diaz, E., Estrada, E., & Lopes, L. M. (1992). Making context: The social construction of lessons in two languages. In M. Saravia-Shore & S. F. Arvizu (Eds.), Cross-cultural literacy: Ethnographies of communication in multiethnic classrooms (pp. 339-363). New York: New Garland.
22. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301-6578.
23. Oliver, M. (1986). Social policy and disability studies: Some theoretical issues. Disability, Handicap, and Society, 1(1), 5-17.
24. Reid, D. K., & Valle, J. W. (2005). A constructivist perspective from the emerging field of disability studies. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Rubin, S., Biklen, D., Kasa-Hendrickson, C., Kluth, P., Cardinal, D., & Broderick, A. (2001). Independence, participation, and the meaning of intellectual ability. Disability and Society, 16, 415-429.
26. Rueda, R., Gallego, M. A., & Moll, L. C. (2000). The least restrictive environment: A place or a context? Remedial and Special Education, 21, 70-78.
27. Salend, S. J. (2004). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices for all students (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
28. Shapiro, A. (2000). Everybody belongs: Changing negative attitudes toward classmates with disabilities (Vol. 14). New York: Routledge.
29. Stiker, H. (2002). A history of disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30. Thomas, G., & Loxley, A. (2001). Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
31. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
32. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
33. Tomlinson, C. A., Callahan, C. M., Tomchin, E. M., & Eiss, N. (1997). Becoming architects of communities of learning: Addressing academic diversity in contemporary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 269-282.
34. Tomlinson, C. A., & Eidson, C. C. (2003). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, Grades 5-9. Alexandria, WV: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
35. Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., & Burns, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
36. Van der Klift, E., & Kunc, N. (1994). Beyond benevolence: Friendship and the politics of help. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa, & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 391-401). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
37. Ware, L. (2001). Writing, identity, and the other: Dare we do disability studies? Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 107-123.
38. Ware, L. (Ed.). (2004). Ideology and the politics of (in)exclusion. New York: Peter Lang.