Rheological evaluation of dispersions, prepared with different non- and gamma-irradiated bioadhesive cospray dried powder mixtures

Pharmazie

Volumn 60, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 593-597

  Bozdag, S ^a,b   Weyenberg, W ^a   Ludwig, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMIOCA; CARBOPOL 974P; EYE DROPS; MAIZE STARCH; POLYMER; STARCH;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DESICCATION; DISPERSION; DRUG BIOAVAILABILITY; DRY POWDER; FLOW KINETICS; FREEZE DRYING; GAMMA IRRADIATION; VISCOELASTICITY;

ADHESIVES; BUFFERS; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; ELASTICITY; FREEZE DRYING; GAMMA RAYS; PHOSPHATES; POLYVINYLS; POWDERS; RHEOLOGY; STARCH; VISCOSITY;

EID: 23844471535     PISSN: 00317144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adriaens E, Ameye D, Dhondt M, Foreman P, Remon JP (2003) Evaluation of the mucosal irritation potency of co-spray dried Amioca®/poly(acrylic acid) and Amioca®/Carbopol® 974P mixtures. J Control Rel 88: 393-399.
2. Ameye D, Voorspoels J, Foreman P, Tsai J, Richardson P, Geresh S, Remon JP (2002) Ex vivo bioadhesion and in vivo testosterone bioavailability study of different bioadhesive formulations based on starch-g-poly(acrylic acid) copolymers and starch/poly(acrylic acid) mixtures. J Control Rel 79: 173-182.
3. Bonferoni MC, Chetoni P, Giunchedi P, Rossi S, Ferrari F, Burgalassi S, Caramella C (2004) Carrageenan-gelatin mucoadhesive systems for ion-exchange based ophthalmic delivery: in vitro and preliminary in vivo studies. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 57: 465-472.
4. Callens C, Pringels E, Remon JP (2003) Influence of multiple nasal administrations of bioadhesive powders on the insulin bioavailability. Int J Pharm 250: 415-422.
5. Ceulemans J, Ludwig A (2002a) Optimisation of carbomer viscous eye drops: an in vitro experimental design approach using rheological techniques. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 54: 41-50.
6. Ceulemans J, Ludwig A (2002b) Development of a rheometric technique to measure the mucoadhesive capacity of a dry powder formulation. Pharmazie 57: 181-185.
7. Ceulemans J, Vermeire A, Adriaens E, Remon JP, Ludwig A (2001) Evaluation of a mucoadhesive tablet for ocular use. J Control Rel 77: 333-344.
8. Deschrieder AS (1960) Changes in starch and its degradation products on irradiating wheat flour with gamma rays. Starch/Stärke 12: 197-198.
9. Deshpande SG, Shirolkar S (1989) Sustained release ophthalmic formulations of pilocarpine. J Pharm Pharmacol 41: 197-200.
10. Edsman K, Carlfors J, Harju K (1996) Rheological evaluation and ocular contact time of some carbomer gels for ophthalmic use. Int J Pharm 137: 233-241.
11. Ferry JD (1970) Viscoelastic properties of polymers, Wiley, New York, NY, 1970.
12. Greaves JL, Wilson CG (1993) Treatment of diseases of the eye with mucoadhesive delivery system. Adv Drug Del Rev 11: 349-383.
13. Hornof M, Weyenberg W, Ludwig A, Bernkop-Schnürch A (2003) Mucoadhesive ocular insert based on thiolated poly(acrylic acid): development and in vivo evaluation in humans. J Control Rel 89: 419-428.
14. Kaur IP, Smitha R (2002) Penetration enhancers and ocular bioadhesives: neo new avenues for ophthalmic drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 28: 353-369.
15. Le Bourlais C, Acar L, Zia H, Sado PA, Needham T, Leverge R (1998) Ophthalmic drug delivery systems-recent advances. Prog Retinal Eye Res 17: 33-58.
16. Lee VHL, Robinson JR (1986) Review: topical ocular drug delivery: recent developments and futures challenges. J Ocul Pharmacol 2: 67-108.
17. Lee JW, Park JH, Robinson JR (2000) Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J Pharm Sci 89: 850-866.
18. Ludwig A, Van Ooteghem M (1992) Influence of viscolysers on the residence of ophthalmic solutions evaluated by slit lamp fluorophotometry. STP Pharma Sci 2: 81-87.
19. Morgan PB, Tullo AB, Efron N (1995) Infrared thermography of the tear film in the dry eye. Eye 9: 615-618.
20. Robinson JR, Mlynek GM (1995) Bioadhesive and phase-change polymer for ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Del Rev 16: 45-50.
21. Saettone MF, Giannaccini B, Teneggi A, Savigni P, Tellini N (1982) Vehicle effect on ophthalmic bioavailability: the influence of different polymers on the activity of pilocarpine in rabbit and man. J Pharm Pharmacol 34: 464-466.
22. Salminen L (1990) Review: systemic absorption of topically applied ocular drugs in humans. J Ocul Pharmacol 6: 243-249.
23. Sintzel MB, Bernatchez SF, Tabatabay C, Gurny R (1996) Biomaterials in ophthalmic drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 42: 358-374.
24. Swan KL (1945) Use of methylcellulose in ophthalmology. Arch Ophthalmol 33: 378-380.
25. Tamburic S, Craig D (1995) An investigation into the rheological, dielectric and mucoadhesive properties of poly (acrylic) acid gel systems. J Control Rel 37: 59-68.
26. Weyenberg W, Ludwig A (2002) In vitro assessment of the interaction mechanisms between mucin and a cationic cellulosic derivative by rheological methods using an experimental design. Pharmazie 57: 628-631.
27. Weyenberg W, Vermeire A, Remon JP, Ludwig A (2003) Characterization and in vivo evaluation of ocular bioadhesive minitablets compressed at different forces. J. Control Rel 89: 329-340.
28. Weyenberg W, Todorov V, Ludwig A (2004) Rheological evaluation of the influence of sterilisation on ocular gels using an experimental design. Pharmazie 59: 121-125.
29. Zaki T, Fitzgerald P, Hardy JG, Wilson CG (1986) A comparison of the effects of viscosity on the precorneal residence of solutions in rabbit and man. J Pharm Pharmacol 38: 463-466.