Rheological evaluation of the influence of sterilisation on ocular gels using an experimental design

Pharmazie

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 121-125

  Weyenberg, W ^a   Todorov, V ^a   Ludwig, Annick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBOPOL 974P; MANNITOL; PHOSPHATE; POLYACRYLIC ACID; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; DRUG PURITY; DRUG STERILITY; ELASTICITY; FLOW KINETICS; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; OSCILLATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; SHEAR FLOW;

BUFFERS; ELASTICITY; ELECTROLYTES; GELS; MANNITOL; RHEOLOGY; STERILIZATION; VISCOSITY;

EID: 1242314318     PISSN: 00317144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baudouin C (1996) Side effects of antiglaucomatous drugs on the ocular surface. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 7: 80-86.
2. Berry M, Ellingham RB, Corfeld AP (2000) Membrane-associated mucins in normal human conjunctiva. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 398-403.
3. Ceulemans J, Vinckier I, Ludwig A (2002a) The use of xanthan gum in an ophthalmic liquid dosage form: rheological characterization of the interaction with mucin. J Pharm Sci 91: 1117-1127.
4. Ceulemans J, Ludwig A (2002b) Optimisation of carbomer viscous eye drops: an in vitro experimental design approach using rheological techniques. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 54: 41-50.
5. Ceulemans J, Ludwig A (2002c) Development of a rheometric method to measure the mucoadhesive capacity of a dry powder formulation. Pharmazie 57: 181-185.
6. Felt O, Furrer P, Mayer JM, Plazonnet B, Buri P, Gamy R. (1999) Topical use of chitosan in ophthalmology: tolerance assessment and evaluation of precorneal retention. Int J Pharm 180: 185-193.
7. Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic Propeties of Polymers, Wiley, New York.
8. Hui HW, Robinson JR (1985) Ocular drug delivery of progesterone using a bioadhesive polymer. Int J Pharm 26: 203-213.
9. Krishnamoorthy R, Mitra AK (1993) Mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery. In: Mitra (Ed) Ophthalmic drug delivery systems, Marcel Dekker, New York (USA) 199-221.
10. Ludwig A, Van Ooteghem M (1992) Influence of viscolysers on the residence of ophthalmic solutions evaluated by slit lamp fluorophotometry. STP Pharma Sciences 2: 81-87.
11. Morgan PB, Tullo AB, Efron N (1995) Infrared thermography of the tear film in dry eye. Eye 9: 615-618.
12. Saettone MF, Salminen L (1995) Ocular inserts for topical delivery. Adv Drug Del Rev 16: 94-106.
13. Topalkara A, Güler C, Arici DS, Arici MK (2000) Adverse effects of topical antiglaucoma drugs on the ocular surface. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 28: 113-117.
14. Vadnere M, Amidon G, Lindenbaum S, Haslam JL (1984) Thermodynamic studies on the gel-sol transition of some pluronic polyols. Int J Pharm 22: 207-218.
15. Van Santvliet L, Ludwig A (1998) The influence of penetration enhancers on the volume instilled of eye drops. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 45: 189-198.
16. Weyenberg W, Ludwig A (2002) In vitro assessment of the interaction mechanisms between mucin and a cationic cellulosic derivative by rheological methods using an experimental design. Pharmazie 57: 628-631.
17. Wiley J (1987) Measuring the effects of variables, Wiley, New York 291.