Estimating intensity variance due to noise in registered images

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 5747, Issue I, 2005, Pages 655-666

  Rohde, Gustavo K ^a,b   Barnett, Alan S ^c   Basser, Peter J ^a   Pierpaoli, Carlo ^a  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Image registration; Interpolation; Noise; Parameter estimation; Variance

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; INTERPOLATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NOISE ABATEMENT; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; IMAGE REGISTRATION; SPATIAL TRANSFORMATIONS; VARIANCE;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

EID: 23844456295     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.593635     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Pluim, J.P., J.B. Maintz, and M.A. Viergever, Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2003. 22(8): p. 986-1004.
2. Maintz, J.B. and M.A. Viergever, A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal, 1998. 2(1): p. 1-36.
3. Ashburner, J. and K.J. Fristen, Voxel-based morphometry-the methods. Neuroimage, 2000.11(6 Pt 1): p. 805-21.
4. Friston, K.J., et al., Statistical Parametric Maps in Functional Imaging: A General Linear Approach. Human Brain Mapping, 1995. 2: p. 189-210.
5. Henkelman, R.M., Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. Med Phys, 1985. 12(2): p. 232-3.
6. Gudbjartsson, H. and S. Patz, The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med, 1995. 34(6): p. 910-4.
7. Sijbers, J., et al., Estimation of the noise in magnitude MR images. Magn Reson Imaging, 1998. 16(1): p. 87-90.
8. Friston, K.J., et al., Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med, 1996. 35(3): p. 346-55.
9. Thacker, N.A., et al., Improved quality of re-sliced MR images using re-normalized sinc interpolation. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1999.10(4): p. 582-8.
10. Grootoonk, S., et al., Characterization and correction of interpolation effects in the realignment of fMRI time series. Neuroimage, 2000. 11(1): p. 49-57.
11. Maas, L.C. and P.F. Renshaw, Post-registration spatial filtering to reduce noise in functional MRI data sets. Magn Reson Imaging, 1999. 17(9): p. 1371-82.
12. Pluim, J.P., J.B. Maintz, and M.A. Viergever, Interpolation artefacts in mutual information-based image registration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2000. 77: p. 211-232.
13. Nickerson, L.D., et al., Estimation of the local statistical noise in positron emission tomography revisited: practical implementation. Neuroimage, 2003. 19(2 Pt 1): p. 442-56.
14. Andersson, J.L. and S. Skare, A Model-Based Method for Retrospective Correction of Geometric Distortions in Diffusion-Weighted EPI. Neuroimage, 2002.16(1): p. 177-99.
15. Haselgrove, J.C. and J.R. Moore, Correction for distortion of echo-planar images used to calculate the apparent diffusion coefficient. Magn Reson Med, 1996. 36(6): p. 960-4.
16. Horsfield, M.A., Mapping eddy current induced fields for the correction of diffusion-weighted echo planar images. Magn Reson Imaging, 1999. 17(9): p. 1335-45.
17. Mangin, J.F., et al., Distortion correction and robust tensor estimation for MR diffusion imaging. Med Image Anal, 2002. 6(3): p. 191-8.
18. Bastin, M.E., Correction of eddy current-induced artefacts in diffusion tensor imaging using iterative cross-correlation. Magn Reson Imaging, 1999. 17(7): p. 1011-24.
19. Rohde, G.K., et al., Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2004. 51(1): p. 103-14.
20. Basser, P.J., J. Mattiello, and D. LeBihan, Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B, 1994. 103(3): p. 247-54.
21. Studholme, C., R.T. Constable, and J.S. Duncan, Accurate alignment of functional EPI data to anatomical MRI using a physics-based distortion model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2000. 19(11): p. 1115-27.
22. Meijering, E.H., W.J. Niessen, and M.A. Viergever, Quantitative evaluation of convolution-based methods for medical image interpolation. Med Image Anal, 2001. 5(2): p. 111-26.
23. Hogg, R.V. and A.T. Craig, Expectations of Functions of Random Variables, in Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, R.W. Pirtle, Editor. 1995, Prentice-Hall, Inc: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
24. Pierpaoli, C., et al., Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology, 1996. 201(3): p. 637-48.
25. Haacke, E.M., et al., Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. 1999, New York: Wiley-Liss.
26. Behrens, T.E., et al., Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2003. 50(5): p. 1077-88.
27. Shrager, R., et al. When is a Gaussian displacement distribution adequate to describe water diffusion in tissues? in Workshop on Diffusion MRI: Biophysical Issues. 2002. Saint-Malo, France: ISMRM.
28. Alexander, D.C., G.J. Barker, and S.R. Arridge, Detection and modeling of non-Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data. Magn Reson Med, 2002. 48(2): p. 331-40.
29. Chang, L.-C., et al. RESTORE: Robust Estimation of Tensors by Outlier Rejection. in 12th annual meeting of ISMRM. 2004. Kyoto, Japan.
30. Maier, S.E., H. Mamata, and R.V. Mulkern, Characterization of normal brain and brain tumor pathology by chisquares parameter maps of diffusion-weighted image data. Eur J Radiol, 2003. 45(3): p. 199-207.