The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 39-59

  Hemais, Barbara ^a  

^a NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Discourse analysis; Grammar; Nonverbal text; Research article

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347034279     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00021-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bazerman, C. (1989). Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Carvalho de S, D., & Vergara, S. C. (1996). Refletindo sobre as possiveis consequências da análise organizacional apoiada em referências estrangeiras. Revista de Administração Pública, 30(6), 123-138.
3. Hyland, K. (1997). Persuasion and context: the pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Paper presented at the 11th European LSP Symposium on Language for Special Purposes, Copenhagen.
4. Lindeberg, A-C. (1994). Rhetorical conventions in the discussion/conclusion sections of research articles in finance, management and marketing. In M. Brekke, O. Andersen, T. Dahl, & J. Myking, Applications and Applications of Current LSP Research, vol. II. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
5. MacDonald, S. P. (1992). A method for analyzing sentence-level differences in disciplinary knowledge making. Written Communication, 9(4), 533-569.
6. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Myers, G. (1992). Textbooks and the sociology of scientific knowledge. English for Specific Purposes, 11(1), 3-17.
8. Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organization cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 570-581.
9. Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. Qualitative Research Methods Series (Vol. 21). Sage.
10. Samraj, B. T. R. (1995). The nature of academic writing in an interdisciplinary field. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Michigan.
11. Staelin, R. (1994). How to write readable papers for Marketing Science. Marketing Science, 25(3), 16-17.
12. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Swales, J. M. (1992). Discourse community and the evaluation of written text. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics.
14. Tadros, A. (1985). Prediction in text. Discourse Analysis Monograph 10, University of Birmingham.
15. Tadros, A. (1994). Predictive categories in expository text. In M. Coulthard, Advances in written text analysis. London: Routledge.
16. Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. P. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 129-148.
17. Thompson, G., & Yiyun, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365-382.
18. Ventola, E. (1996). Packing and unpacking of information in academic texts. In E. Ventola, & A. Mauranen, Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.