Multiple gene evidence for parallel evolution and retention of ancestral morphological states in the shanks (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae)

Condor

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 514-526

  Pereira, Sérgio Luiz ^a   Baker, Allan J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Ancestral states; Divergence time; Parallel evolution; Plesiomorphy; Scolopacidae; Shanks; Systematics

Indexed keywords

ACTITIS; CATOPTROPHORUS; CHARADRIIFORMES; HETEROSCELUS; SCOLOPACIDAE; TRINGA; XENUS;

EID: 23744447511     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1650/0010-5422(2005)107[0514:MGEFPE]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. BÖHME, M. 2003. The Miocene climatic optimum: evidence from ectothermic vertebrates of Central Europe. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimateology, Palaeoecology 195:389-401.
2. CAO, Y., J. ADACHI, A. JANKE, S. PÄÄBO, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: instability of a tree based on a single gene. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39:519-527.
3. CHRISTIAN, P. D., L. CHRISTIDIS, AND R. SCHODDE. 1992. Biochemical systematics of the Charadriiformes (shorebirds): relationships between Charadrii, Scolopaci and Lari. Australian Journal of Zoology 40:291-302.
4. CHU, P. C. 1995. Phylogenetic reanalysis of Strauch's osteological data set for the Charadriiformes. Condor 97:174-196.
5. CLEMENTS, J. F. 2000. Birds of the World: a checklist. 5th ed. Ibis Publishing Company, Temecula, CA.
6. DAVID, N., AND M. GOSSELIN. 2002. Gender agreement of avian species names. Bulletin of the British Ornithogical Club 122:14-49.
7. DROVETSKI, S. V. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of grouse: individual and combined performance of W-linked, autosomal and mitochondrial loci. Systematic Biology 51:930-945.
8. FOSTER, P. G., AND D. A. HICKEY. 1999. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. Journal of Molecular Evolution 48:284-290.
9. FRIESEN, V. L., A. J. BAKER, AND J. F. PIATT. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships within the Alcidae (Charadriiformes: Aves) inferred from total molecular evidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13:359-367.
10. FRUMHOFF, P. C., AND H. H. REEVE. 1994. Using phylogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: a critique of some current proposals. Evolution 48:172-180.
11. GALLAGHER, S. J., A. J. SMITH, K. JONASSON, M. W. WALLACE, G. R. HOLDGATE, J. DANIELS, AND D. TAYLOR. 2001. The Miocene palaeoenvironmental and palaeoceanographic evolution of the Gippsland Basin, Southeast Australia: a record of Southern Ocean change. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimateology, Palaeoecology 172:53-80.
12. GROTH, J. G., AND G. F. BARROWCLOUGH. 1999. Basal divergence in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12:115-123.
13. HADDRATH, O., AND A. J. BAKER. 2001. Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences of extinct birds: ratite phylogenetics and the vicariance biogeography hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 268:939-945.
14. HAGELBERG, E. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA from ancient bones, p. 195-204. In B. Herrmann and S. Hummel [EDS.], Ancient DNA. Springer, New York.
15. HAYMAN, P., J. MARCHANT, AND T. PRATER. 1986. Shorebirds. An identification guide to the waders of the world. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.
16. HUELSENBECK, J. P., R. NIELSEN, AND J. P. BOLLBACK. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Systematic Biology 52:131-158.
17. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE. 1999. International code of zoological nomenclature. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, UK.
18. IVANOV, D., A. R. ASHRAF, V. MOSBRUGGER, AND E. PALAMAREV. 2002. Palynological evidence for Miocene climate change in the Forecarpathian Basin (Central Paratethys, NW Bulgaria). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimateology, Palaeoecology 178:19-37.
19. JEHL, J. R., JR. 1968. Relationships in the Charadrii (shorebirds): a taxonomic study based on color patterns of the downy young. Memoirs of the San Diego Society of Natural History 3:1-54.
20. JOHNSGARD, P. A. 1981. The plovers, sandpipers and snipes of the world. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.
21. LARSON, S. 1957. The suborder Charadrii in artic and boreal areas during the Tertiary and Pleistocene. Acta Vertebratica 1:1-84.
22. LEE, M. S. Y., AND A. F. HUGALL. 2003. Partitioned likelihood support and the evaluation of data set conflict. Systematic Biology 52:15-22.
23. LEWIS, P. O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50:913-925.
24. MADDISON, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated in certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44:539-557.
25. MADDISON, D. R., AND W. P. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA.
26. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON [ONLINE]. 2003. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 1.0 〈http://mesquiteproject. org〉 (17 January 2005).
27. MAYR, E., AND L. L. SHORT JR. 1970. Species taxa of North American birds: a contribution to comparative systematics. Nuttall Ornithological Club Publications 9, Cambridge, MA.
28. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND L. R. PARENTI. 1980. The phylogeny of the Charadriiformes (Aves): a new estimate using the method of character compatibility analysis by J. G. Strauch. Systematic Zoology 29:108-113.
29. MOOERS, A. O., AND E. C. HOLMES. 2000. The evolution of base composition and phylogenetic inference. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:365-369.
30. NICHOLS, J. T. 1923. Yellow-legs skeletons. Auk 40:593-595.
31. OMLAND, K. E. 1997. Examining two standard assumptions of ancestral reconstructions: repeated loss of dichromatism in dabbling ducks (Anatini). Evolution 51:1636-1646.
32. PAGEL, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral characters states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 48:612-622.
33. PATON, T. A., A. J. BAKER, J. G. GROTH, AND G. F. BARROWCLOUGH. 2003. RAG-1 sequences resolve phylogenetic relationships within Charadriform birds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29:268-278.
34. PEREIRA, S. L., AND A. J. BAKER. 2004a. A vicariant hypothesis for the speciation of curassows (Aves, Cracidae) based on mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. Auk 121:682-694.
35. PEREIRA, S. L., AND A. J. BAKER. 2004b. Low number of mitochondrial pseudogenes in the chicken (Callus gallus) nuclear genome: implications for molecular inference of population history and phylogenetics. BMC Evolutionary Biology 4:17.
36. PEREIRA, S. L., A. J. BAKER, AND A. WAJNTAL. 2002. Combined nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences resolve the generic relationships within the Cracidae (Galliformes, Aves). Systematic Biology 51:946-958.
37. PETERS, J. L. 1934. Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
39. RONQUIST, F. R., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
40. SAMBROOK, J., E. F. FRITSCH, AND T. MANIATIS. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
41. SANDERSON, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:101-109.
42. SCHLUTER, T. R., T. PRICE, A. O. MOOERS, AND D. LUDWIN. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptative radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711.
43. SCHULTZ, T. R., R. B. COCROFT, AND G. A. CHURCHILL. 1996. The reconstruction of character states. Evolution 50:504-511.
44. SHIMODAIRA, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Systematic Biology 51:492-508.
45. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17:1246-1247.
46. STRAUCH, J. G., JR. 1978. The phylogeny of the Charadriiformes (Aves): a new estimate using the method of character compatibility analysis. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 34:263-345.
47. STRIMMER, K., AND A. VON HAESELER. 1996. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13:964-969.
48. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
49. SYBLEY, C. G., AND B. L. MONROE JR. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the World. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
50. VAURIE, C. 1965. The birds of the Paleartic fauna: non-passeriformes. Witherby, London, UK