Learning to critique in EAP

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 211-227

  Kiely, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classroom ethnography; Critical learning; EAP; Speaking skills in EAP; Task based learning; Teacher feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444453881     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2003.11.004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: theory, politics and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Canagarajah, S. (2002). Multilingual writers and the academic community: towards a critical relationship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 29-44.
3. Connor, U. (2002). New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 493-510.
4. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.
5. Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning.Bristol: CNAA Technical and Education Services.
6. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organisations: software of the mind. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
7. Holliday, A. (1997). Six lessons: cultural continuity in communicative language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 212-238.
8. Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1-12.
9. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity; the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. Kiely, R. (1998). Programme evaluation by teachers: issues of policy and practice. In P. Rea-Dickins, & K. Germaine (Eds.), Managing evaluation and innovation in language teaching (pp. 78-104). Harlow: Longman.
11. Kiely, R. (2001). Classroom evaluation - values, interests and teacher development. Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 241-261.
12. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
13. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.
14. McCarthy, T. (1989). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Polity (J. Habermas, Trans.) (Original work published 1968).
15. Reid, J. (1995). Teaching ESL writing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
16. Roberts, C., Davies, E., & Jupp, T. (1992). Language and discrimination. Harlow: Longman.
17. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Watson-Todd, R. (2003). EAP or TEAP?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), 147-156.
19. White, R. (1998). New ways in teaching writing. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
20. Young, R. (1992). Critical theory and classroom talk. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.