Anhydrous Polyproline Helices and Globules

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 108, Issue 15, 2004, Pages 4885-4898

  Counterman, Anne E ^a,b   Clemmer, David E ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; CONFORMATIONS; ELECTRON MOBILITY; HYDROGEN BONDS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; SOLUTIONS;

ELECTROSPRAYING; POLYPROLINE; PROTONATION; TIME-OF-FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETERS;

POLYPEPTIDES;

EID: 2342622637     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp036454a     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Poly-α-amino Acids; Fasman, G. D., Ed.; M. Dekker; New York, 1967.
2. IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. Biochemistry 1970, 9, 3471.
3. Kim, H. D. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1997, 18, 922.
4. Zheng, N. J.; Rau, G.; Hazlewood, C. F.; Rau, C. Scanning Microsc. 1991, 5, 631; Rau, C.; Zheng, N. J.; Hazlewood, C.; Rau, G. Physiol. Chem. Phys. Med. NMR 1995, 27, 55.
5. Zheng, N. J.; Rau, G.; Hazlewood, C. F.; Rau, C. Scanning Microsc. 1991, 5, 631; Rau, C.; Zheng, N. J.; Hazlewood, C.; Rau, G. Physiol. Chem. Phys. Med. NMR 1995, 27, 55.
6. Bella, J.; Brodsky, B.; Berman, H. M. Structure 1995, 3, 893.
7. Stanley, J. A.; Peemoeller, H. J. Phys. II 1991, 1, 1491.
8. Dukor, R. K.; Keiderling, T. A. Biospectroscopy 1996, 2, 83.
9. Fenn, J. B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C. K.; Wong, S. F.; Whitehouse, C. M. Science 1989, 246, 64.
10. Martin, S. A.; Biemann, K. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1987, 78, 213.
11. Hunt, D. F.; Yates, J. R.; Shabanowitz, J.; Winston, S.; Hauer, C. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 83, 6233.
12. Loo, J. A.; Edmonds, C. G.; Smith, R. D. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 425.
13. He, M.; Reid, G. E.; Shang, H.; Lee, G. U.; McLuckey, S. A. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 4653.
14. Breci, L. A.; Tabb, D. L.; Yates, J. R., III; Wysocki, V. H. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1963.
15. Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 1946.
16. Hudgins, R. R.; Ratner, M. A.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12974.
17. Kinnear, B. S.; Kaleta, D. T.; Kontani. M.; Hudgins, R. R.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9243.
18. Kaleta, D. T.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 4436.
19. Kinnear, B. S.; Hartings, M. R.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5660.
20. Kinnear, B. S.; Hartings, M. R.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4422.
21. Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1490.
22. Srebalus-Barnes, C. A.; Clemmer, D. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 10566.
23. Kinnear, B. S.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7907.
24. Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 12045.
25. For recent reviews, see: (a) Clemmer, D. E.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 577. (b) Hoaglund Hyzer, C. S.; Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3037.
26. For recent reviews, see: (a) Clemmer, D. E.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 577. (b) Hoaglund Hyzer, C. S.; Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3037.
27. (a) Hoaglund, C. S.; Valentine, S. J.; Sporleder, C. R.; Reilly, J. P.; Clemmer, D. E. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2236. (b) Henderson, S. C.; Valentine, S. J.; Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 291.
28. (a) Hoaglund, C. S.; Valentine, S. J.; Sporleder, C. R.; Reilly, J. P.; Clemmer, D. E. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2236. (b) Henderson, S. C.; Valentine, S. J.; Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 291.
29. Li, J.; Taraszka, J. A.; Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 185/186/187, 37.
30. Hudgins, R. R.; Woenckhaus, J.; Jarrold, M. F. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 165/166, 497.
31. (a) von Helden, G.; Wyttenbach, T.; Bowers, M. T. Science, 1995, 267, 1483. (b) Wyttenbach, T.; von Helden, G.; Bowers, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8355.
32. (a) von Helden, G.; Wyttenbach, T.; Bowers, M. T. Science, 1995, 267, 1483. (b) Wyttenbach, T.; von Helden, G.; Bowers, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8355.
33. Clemmer, D. E.; Hudgins, R. R.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10141.
34. Valentine, S. J.; Counterman, A. E.; Hoaglund, C. S.; Reilly, J. P.; Clemmer, D. E. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 1213.
35. Wu, C.; Siems, W. F.; Asbury, G. R.; Hill, H. H. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 4929.
36. von Helden, G.; Hsu, M.-T.; Kemper, P. R.; Bowers, M. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 3835.
37. Jarrold, M. F.; Constant, V. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 67, 2994.
38. For recent reviews of ion mobility studies of biomolecules see: (a) Clemmer, D. E.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 577. (b) Hoaglund Hyzer, C. S.; Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3037.
39. For recent reviews of ion mobility studies of biomolecules see: (a) Clemmer, D. E.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 577. (b) Hoaglund Hyzer, C. S.; Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3037.
40. linear = 25.95n + 27.75. as determined from a fit to calculated cross sections (as described in ref 19) for linear structures.
41. Ewing, N. P.; Zhang, X.; Cassady, C. J. J. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 31, 1345.
42. Because of limitations in our modeling software, we chose to place protons on imide nitrogens of the proline residues rather than at the more basic carbonyl oxygens [for measurements of proton affinities, see, for instance, the following: (a) Zhang, K.; Cassady, C. J.; Chung-Phillips, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11512. (b) Addario, V.; Guo, Y.; Chu, I. K.; Ling, Y.; Ruggerio, G.; Rodriguez, C. F.; Hopkinson, A. C.; Siu, K. W. M. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 219, 1011. Our justification for placing the protons is that for these large systems. Coulombic repulsion between charges is the dominant driving force (as observed in our work on large, multiply protonated polyalanine systems; see, for instance, refs 20 and 23). Our measurement allows us to discriminate between different conformer types (such as different types of helices or globules) but does not provide the ability to resolve structures at atomic resolution. In modeling the large polymer systems examined here, the exact placement of protonation sites should not significantly affect the results.
43. Because of limitations in our modeling software, we chose to place protons on imide nitrogens of the proline residues rather than at the more basic carbonyl oxygens [for measurements of proton affinities, see, for instance, the following: (a) Zhang, K.; Cassady, C. J.; Chung-Phillips, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11512. (b) Addario, V.; Guo, Y.; Chu, I. K.; Ling, Y.; Ruggerio, G.; Rodriguez, C. F.; Hopkinson, A. C.; Siu, K. W. M. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 219, 1011. Our justification for placing the protons is that for these large systems. Coulombic repulsion between charges is the dominant driving force (as observed in our work on large, multiply protonated polyalanine systems; see, for instance, refs 20 and 23). Our measurement allows us to discriminate between different conformer types (such as different types of helices or globules) but does not provide the ability to resolve structures at atomic resolution. In modeling the large polymer systems examined here, the exact placement of protonation sites should not significantly affect the results.
44. Drakenberg, T.; Forsen, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 1.
45. Roques, B. P.; Garbay-Jaureguiberry, C.; Combrisson, S.; Oberlin, R. Biopolymers 1977, 16, 937.
46. Cheng, H. N.; Bovey, F. A. Biopolymers 1977, 16, 1465.
47. Albers, M. W.; Walsh, C. T.; Schruber, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4984.
48. Shvartsburg, A. A.; Jarrold, M. F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 261, 86.
49. Mesleh, M. F.; Hunter, J. M.; Shvartsburg, A. A.; Schatz, G. C.; Jarrold, M. F. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16082.
50. calc = (97.1n + z)/z.
51. Henderson, S. C.; Li, J.; Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 8780.
52. Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4031.