Object-and location-based inhibition in goal-directed action: Inhibition of return reveals behavioural and anatomical dissociations and interactions with memory processes

Attention in Action: Advances from Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 171-210

  Grison, Sarah ^a   Kessler, Klaus ^b   Paul, Matthew A ^c   Jordan, Heather ^d   Tipper, Steven P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23244444435     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203449226     Document Type: Chapter

References (163)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1995). The gap effect and inhibition of return: interactive effects on eye movement latencies. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 483-487.
3. Abrams, R. A., & Jonides, J. (1988). Programming saccadic eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 428-443.
4. Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (2000). Oculocentric coding of inhibited eye movements to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 776-778.
5. Althoff, R. R., & Cohen, N. J. (1999). Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 997-1010.
6. Anderson, R. A. (1989). Visual and eye movement functions of the posterior parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 12, 377-403.
7. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
8. Bartolomeo, P., Chokron, S., & Siéroff, E. (1999). Facilitation instead of inhibition for repeated right-sided events in left negalect. Neuroreport, 10, 3353-3357.
9. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 451-470.
10. Becker, L., & Egeth, H. (2000). Mixed reference frames for dynamic inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1167-1177.
11. Berger, A., & Henik, A. (2000). The endogenous modulation of IOR is nasal-temporal asymmetric. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 421-428.
12. Berlucchi, G., Aglioti, S., & Tassinari, G. (1997). Rightward attentional bias and left hemisphere dominance in a cue-target light detection task in a callosotomy patient. Neuropsychologia, 35, 941-952.
13. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-145.
14. Bruce, C. J. (1990). Integration of sensory and motor signals for saccadic eye movements in the primate frontal eye fields. In G. M. Edelman, W. E. Gall, & W. M. Cowan (Eds.), Signal and sense, local and global order in perceptual maps (pp.261-314). New York: Wiley-Liss.
15. Bruce, V., & Humphreys, G. W. (1994). Recognizing objects and faces. In V. Bruce & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Object and face recognition. Special issue of Visual Cognition, 1, pp. 141-180.
16. Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., O'Donnell, C., & Pratt, J. (2002). Disengaging the negative priming mechanism in location tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 207-225.
17. Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., & Craik, F. I. M. (2002, November). The role of working memory in inhibition of return. Poster session presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO.
18. Christ, S. E., McCrae, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (2002). Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 80-85.
19. Clark, V P., & Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 387-402.
20. Clohessy, A. B., Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., & Vecera, S. P. (1991). The development of inhibition of return in early infancy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 345-350.
21. Cohen, J. D., Braver, T. S., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1998). A computational approach to prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, and schizophrenia: recent developments and current challenges. In A. C. Roberts & T. W. Robbins (Eds.), The prefrontal cortex: executive and cognitive functions (pp.195-220). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Connor, C. E., Preddie, D. C., Gallant, J. L., & Van Essen, D. C. (1997). Spatial attention effects in macaque area V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 3201-3214.
23. Costello, A. D., & Warrington, E. K. (1987). The dissociation of visuospatial neglect and neglect dyslexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 50, 1110-1116.
24. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-185.
25. Cubelli, R., Nichelli, P., Bonito, V., de Tanti, A., & Inzaghi, M. G. (1991). Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 15, 139-159.
26. Danziger, S., Fendrich, R., & Rafal, R. D. (1997). Inhibitory tagging of locations in the blind field of hemianopic patients. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 291-307.
27. Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., & Snyder, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1467-1475.
28. De Renzi, E., & Spinnler, H. (1966). Visual recognition in patients with unilateral cerebral disease. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 142, 515-525.
29. DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 27-47.
30. Dorris, M. C., Klein, R. M., Everling, S., & Munoz, D. P. (2001). Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return. Manuscript submitted for publication.
31. Dorris, M. C., & Munoz, D. P. (1995). A neural correlate for the gap effect on saccadic reaction times in monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2558-2562.
32. Dorris, M. C., Taylor, T. L., Klein, R. M., & Munoz, D. P. (1999). Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 2429-2436.
33. Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention, and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61-95.
34. Eimer, M. (1997). Attentional selection and attentional gradients: an alternative method for studying transient visual-spatial attention. Psychophysiology, 34, 365-376.
35. Fenske, M. J., Kessler, K., Raymond, J. E., & Tipper, S. P. (2003, May). Attentional inhibition determines emotional responses to unfamiliar faces. Poster presented at the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
36. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 145-173.
37. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
38. Gilbert, C., & Bakan, P. (1973). Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. Neuropsy-chologia, 11, 355-362.
39. Goldberg, M. E., & Wurtz, R. H. (1972). Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey: I. Visual receptive fields of single neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 542-559.
40. Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2001). Shedding light on brain function: the event-related optical signal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 357-363.
41. Grison, S., Paul, M. A., Kessler, K., & Tipper, S. P. (in press). Inhibition of object identity in inhibition of return of attention: Implications for encoding and retrieving inhibitory processes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
42. Grison, S., Tipper, S. P., & Hewitt, O. (in press). Long-term negative priming: support for retrieval of prior attentional process. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology; Section A: Human Experimental Psychology.
43. Grison, S., Tipper, S. P., & Kramer, A. F. (2004). Long-term inhibition of return effects suggest episodic retrieval of attentional states. Manuscript submitted for publication.
44. Gross, C. G. (1991). Contribution of striate cortex and the superior colliculus to visual function in area MT, the superior temporal polysensory area and inferior temporal cortex. Special issue in honor of Karl H. Pribram: Localization and distribution of cognitive function. Neuropsychologia, 29, 497-515.
45. Handy, T. C., Jha, A. P., Kingstone, A., & Mangun, G. R. (1995, November). Attentional hemispheric asymmetries in chronometric analysis of inhibition of return. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA.
46. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577.
47. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp.53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48. Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Shore, D. I. (1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention: some tests of a neural network model. Visual Cognition, 3, 119-164.
49. Howard, L. A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Inhibition of return in a selective reaching task: an investigation of reference frames. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 421-442.
50. Howard, L. A., & Tipper, S. P. (2001). Frames-of-reference in inhibition of return: a selective reaching task. Unpublished raw data.
51. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1994). Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: multiple sites for visual selection. Special issue: The cognitive neuropsychology of attention. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 207-241.
52. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1995). Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 283-311.
53. Ingle, D. (1977). Detection of stationary objects by frogs (Rana pipiens) after ablation of optic tectum. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 91, 1359-1364.
54. Ingle, D., Cheal, M., & Dizio, P. (1979). Cine analysis of visual orientation and pursuit by the Mongolian gerbil. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 93, 919-928.
55. Jeannerod, M., Arbib, M. A., Rizzolatti, G., & Sakata, H. (1995). Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neuroscience, 18, 314-320.
56. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1998). Object-based inhibition of return in static displays. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 504-509.
57. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Spread of inhibition across an object's surface. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 495-507.
58. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (2001).Evidence for object-and location-based inhibition of return in static displays: visual field asymmetries. Unpublished raw data.
59. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
60. Kanwisher, N. (1998). The modular structure of human visual recognition: evidence from functional imaging. In M. Sabourin, F. Craik, & M. Robert (Eds.), Advances in psychological science, Vol. 2: Biological and cognitive aspects (pp.199-213). Hove: Psychology Press.
61. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
62. Kanwisher, N., Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1998). The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area. Cognition, 68, 1-11.
63. Kanwisher, N., Woods, R. P., Iacoboni, M., & Mazziotta, J. C. (1997). A locus in human extrastriate cortex for visual shape analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 133-142.
64. Kessler, K., Pfennig, H. E., & Rickheit, G. (2001, September). Visual chunking in a connectionist model: behavioral data and eye-movements. Poster presented at the Joint Meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology and the British Psychological Society, Cognitive Psychology Section, Edinburgh, UK.
65. Kessler, K., & Rickheit, G. (1999). Dynamische Konzeptgenerierung in kon-nektionistischen Netzen: Begriffsklaerung, Modellvorstellungen zur Szenenrekon-struktion und experimentelle Ergebnisse. Kognitionswissenschaft, 8, 74-96.
66. Kessler, K., & Rickheit, G. (2000). Dynamic binding and context influences during scene perception: simulations and experimental results. In N. Taatgen & J. Aasman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp.177-184). Veenendaal, Netherlands: Universal Press.
67. Kessler, K., & Tipper, S. P. (in press). Retrieval of implicit inhibitory attentional processes: the impact of visual field, object-identity, and memory dynamics. Visual Cognition.
68. Kingstone, A., & Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1046-1054.
69. Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
70. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
71. Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
72. Klein, R. M., & Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp.113-150). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
73. Leehey, S., Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Cahn, A. (1978). Upright and inverted faces: the right hemisphere knows the difference. Cortex, 14, 411-419.
74. Leek, E. C., Reppa, I., & Tipper, S. P. (2003). Inhibition-of-return for objects and locations in static displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 388-395.
75. Lepsien, J., & Pollman, S. (2002). Covert reorienting and inhibition of return: an event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 127-144.
76. Lesher, G. W. (1995). Illusory contours: towards a neurally based perceptual theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 279-321.
77. Lewis, T. L., Maurer, D., & Milewski, A. (1979). The development of nasal detection in young infants. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 18, 271.
78. List, A., & Robertson, L. C. (2001). Inhibition of return and object-based attention. Manuscript submitted for publication.
79. Logothetis, N. K., & Pauls, J. (1995). Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Cerebral Cortex, 3, 270-288.
80. Lowe, D. (1998). Long-term positive and negative identity priming: evidence for episodic retrieval. Memory and Cognition, 26, 435-443.
81. Lupiáñez, J., & Solano, C. (1997). Inhibition of return in a colour discrimination task: no interaction with the Simon effect. Cognitiva, 9, 195-205.
82. Lupiáñez, J., Tudela, P., & Rueda, C. (1999). Inhibitory control in attentional orientation: a review about inhibition of return. Cognitiva, 11, 23-44.
83. Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A. et al. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 92, 8135-8139.
84. Mangun, G. R., Hillyard, S. A., & Luck, S. J. (1993). Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. In D. E. Meyers & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp.219-243). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: W. H. Freeman.
86. May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54.
87. Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. Marin (Eds.), Attention and perfomance XI (pp.189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
88. McAuliffe, J., Pratt, J., & O'Donnell, C. (2001). Examining location-based and object-based components of inhibition of return in static displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 1072-1082.
89. McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Gore, J. C., & Allison, T. (1997). Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 605-610.
90. McCrae, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (2001). Age-related differences in object-and location-based inhibition of return of attention. Psychology and Aging, 16, 437-449.
91. McDonald, J. W., Ward, L. M., & Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1411-1423.
92. McDowd, J. M., Filion, D. L., Tipper, S. P., & Weaver, B. (1995, November). Object-and environment-based IOR in young and old adults. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
93. Mertens, I., Siegmund, H., & Grüsser, O. J. (1993). Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task. Neuropsychologia, 31, 989-998.
94. Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupiáñez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: on the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1280-1296.
95. Milner, B. (1968). Visual recognition and recall after right temporal-lobe excision in man. Neuropsychologia, 6, 191-209.
96. Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (1996). Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 224-249.
97. Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
98. Munoz, D. P., & Wurtz, R. H. (1993a). Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus: I. Characteristics of cell discharge. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 559-575.
99. Munoz, D. P., & Wurtz, R. H. (1993b). Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus: II. Reversible activation and deactivation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 576-589.
100. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp.207-261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
101. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 993-1000.
102. Nelson, E., Early, T. S., & Haller, J. W. (1993). Visual attention in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 49, 183-196.
103. Neumann, E., Iwahara, A., & Tajika, H. (1999, October). Long-term negative priming for once ignored semantically meaningful shapes. Poster session presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Psychological Society, Hobart, Tasmania.
104. Neumann, E., & Russell, P. N. (2000, November). Persistence of token resistance: once-unattended words produce long-term negative priming. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.
105. Ogawa, H., Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. (2002). Inhibitory tagging on randomly moving objects. Psychological Science, 13, 125-129.
106. Olson, C. R., & Gettner, S. N. (1995). Object-centered direction selectivity in the macaque supplementary eye field. Science, 269, 985-988.
107. Oonk, H. M., & Abrams, R. A. (1998). New perceptual objects that capture attention produce inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 510-515.
108. Paul, M., & Tipper, S. P. (2003). Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 283-289.
109. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1980). Attention and the control of movements. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp.243-258). New York: Elsevier.
110. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp.531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
111. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: neural basis and function. Journal of Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
112. Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1343-1353.
113. Rafal, R. D. (1998). The neurology of visual orienting: a pathological disintegration of development. In J. Richards (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention: a developmental perspective (pp.181-219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
114. Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P., Brennan, C., & Sciolto, T. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 673-685.
115. Rafal, R., Henik, A., & Smith, J. (1991). Extrageniculate contributions to reflex visual orienting in normal humans: a temporal hemifield advantage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 322-328.
116. Rafal, R. D., Posner, M. I., Friedman, J. H., Inhoff, A. W., & Bernstein, E. (1988). Orienting of visual attention in progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain, 111, 267-280.
117. Rafal, R. D., Smith, J., Krantz, J., Cohen, A., & Brennan, C. (1990). Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field. Science, 250, 118-121.
118. Reppa, I., & Leek, E. C. (2003). The modulation of inhibition-of-return by object-internal structure: implications for theories of object-based attentional selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 493-502.
119. Ricciardelli, P., Ro, T., & Driver, J. (2002). A left visual field advantage in perception of gaze direction. Neuropsychologia, 40, 769-777.
120. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Lockhurst, L., Burroughs, E., & Bateman, A. (1995). "Paradoxical neglect": spatial representations, hemisphere-specific activation, and spatial cuing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 569-604.
121. Ro, T., Farnè, A., & Chang, E. (2003). Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields. Experimental Brain Research, DOI 10.1007/s00221-003-1470-0 http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00221/contents/03/01470/paper/s00221-003-1470-0ch000.html
122. Ro, T., & Rafal, R. D. (1999). Components of reflexive visual orienting to moving objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 826-836.
123. Robertson, L. C., & Ivry, R. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetries: attention to visual and auditory primitives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 59-63.
124. Rosen, A. C., Rao, S. M., Caffarra, P., Scaglioni, A., Bobholz, J. A., Woodley, S. J. et al. (1999). Neural basis of endogenous and exogenous spatial orienting: a functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 135-152.
125. Rossion, B., Dricot, L., Devolder, A., Bodart, J., Crommelinck, M., de Gelder, B. et al. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 793-802.
126. Sapir, A., Rafal, R., & Henik, A. (2002). Attending to the thalamus: inhibition of return and nasal-temporal asymmetry in the pulvinar. NeuroReport, 13, 1-5.
127. Sapir, A., Soroker, N., Berger, A., & Henik, A. (1999). Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1053-1054.
128. Schendel, K. L., Robertson, L. C., & Treisman, A. (2001). Objects and their locations in exogenous cuing. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 577-594.
129. Schiller, P. H., & Stryker, M. (1972). Single-unit recording and stimulation in superior colliculus of the alert rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 915-924.
130. Schlag, J., & Schlag-Rey, M. (1987). Evidence for a supplementary eye field. Journal of Neurophysiology, 57, 179-200.
131. Shah, N. J., Marshall, J. C., Zafiris, O., Schwab, A., Zilles, K., Markowitsch, H. J. et al. (2001). The neural correlates of person familiarity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study with clinical implications. Brain, 124, 804-815 (special issue).
132. Simion, F., Valenza, E., Umiltà, C., & Dalla Barba, B. (1995). Inhibition of return in newborns is temporo-nasal asymmetrical. Infant Behavior and Development, 18, 189-194.
133. Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: how many separate loci are inhibited? Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
134. Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (2001). Inhibition of return at multiple locations: when you see it and when you don't. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1221-1237.
135. Sparks, D. L., & Mays, L. E. (1983). Spatial localization of saccade targets: I. Compensation for stimulation-induced perturbations in eye position. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 45-63.
136. Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 927-934.
137. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. Neuropsychologia, 25, 55-72.
138. Tassinari, G., Biscaldi, M., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1989). Ipsilateral inhibition and contralateral facilitation of simple reaction time to non-foveal visual targets from non-informative visual cues. Acta Psychologica, 70, 267-291.
139. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 625-643.
140. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379-385.
141. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
142. Tipper, S. P., & Behrmann, M. (1996). Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1261-1278.
143. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991a). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
144. Tipper, S. P., Grison, S., & Kessler, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14, 19-25.
145. Tipper, S. P., Howard, L., & Jackson, S. (1997a). Selective reaching to grasp: evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition, 4, 1-38.
146. Tipper, S. P., Jordan, H., & Weaver, B. (1999). Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 50-60.
147. Tipper, S. P., & Kessler, K. (2002).Implicit retrieval of inhibitory states from memory. Unpublished raw data.
148. Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: evidence for action centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905.
149. Tipper, S. P., & Weaver, B. (1998). The medium of attention: location-based, object-centered, or scene-based? In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention: Vancouver studies in cognitive science (Vol. 8, pp. 77-107). New York: Oxford University Press.
150. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J., & Bastedo, J. (1991b). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localisation tasks: time course and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 681-692.
151. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499.
152. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Rafal, R., Starrveldt, Y., Egly, R., Danziger, S. et al. (1997b). Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1522-1532.
153. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Watson, F. L. (1996). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1289-1293.
154. Treisman, A., & DeSchepper, B. (1995). Object tokens, attention, and visual memory. In T. Inui & J. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI (pp.16-46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
155. Valenza, E., Simion, F., & Umiltà, C. (1994). Inhibition of return in newborn infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 293-302.
156. Van Opstal, A. J., Hepp, K., Suzuki, Y., & Henn, V. (1995). Influence of eye position on activity in monkey superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 1593-1610.
157. Vivas, A. B., Humphreys, G. W., & Fuentes, L. J. (2003). Inhibitory processing following damage to the parietal lobe. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1531-1540.
158. Weaver, B., Lupiáñez, J., & Watson, F. L. (1998). The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 993-1003.
159. White, H., Marks, W., & Wilkinson, G. (2001, November). Spatial and semantic inhibition of return: individual differences related to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Poster session presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
160. Wolfe, J. M., & Pokorny, C. W. (1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: a failure to replicate. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 357-362.
161. Wurtz, R. H., & Goldberg, M. E. (1972). Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkeys. III. Cells discharging before movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 575-586.
162. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141.
163. Zarate, M. A., Sanders, J. D., & Garza, A. A. (2000). Neurological dissociations of social perception processes. Social Cognition, 18, 223-251.