Reconsidering essentialism

Journal of Management Inquiry

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 186-192

  Krefting, Linda A ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044520890     PISSN: 10564926     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105649260092014     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Angler, N. (1999). Woman: An intimate geography. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2. Bannon, L. (1996, June 6). How a risky surgery became a profit center for some L.A. doctors. Wall Street Journal, pp. A1, 8.
3. Barash, D. P., & Lipton, J. E. (1997). Making sense of sex: How genes and gender influence our rektionships. Washington, DC: Island Press.
4. Barrett, F. J. (1996). The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the U.S. Navy. Gender, Work, and Organization, 3,129-142.
5. Beauvior, S. de. (1989). The second sex (H. Parshley, Ed., Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1953)
6. Billing, Y. D., & Alvesson, M. (1999, July). A critical perspective on the gender labeling of leadership. Paper presented at the 17th Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism, Edinburgh, Scotland.
7. Blum, D. (1997). Sex on the brain: The biological differences between men and women. New York: Viking.
8. Butler, J. (1998). Sex and gender in Simone de Beauvoir's Second Sex. In E. Failaize (Ed.), Simone de Beauvior: A critical reader (pp. 29-42). London: Routledge.
9. Calas, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1993). Dangerous liaisons: The feminine-in-management meets "globalization." Business Horizons, 36,71-81.
10. Clegg, S., & Hardy, C. (1996). Représentations. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizations studies (pp. 676-708). London: Sage.
11. Cole, J. (1999, Novembers). Airbus prepares to "bet the company" as it builds a huge new jet. Wall Street Journal, pp. Al, 10.
12. Conlin, M. (1999, November 22). The CEO still wears wingtips. Business Week, pp. 82-90.
13. Connell, R. W. (1998). Making gendered people: Bodies, identities, sexualities. In M. Ferrée, J. Lorber, & B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 449-472). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. de Waal, F. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Failaize, E. (1998). Introduction. In E. Failaize (Ed.), Simone de Beauvoir: A critical reader. London: Routledge.
16. Fletcher, J. (1998). Relational practice: A feminist reconstruction of work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7,163-186.
17. Geary, D. C. (1998). Male,female: Tlie evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Gherardi, S. (1995). Gender, symbolism, and organizational cultures. London: Sage.
19. Hirsch, P. M. & Andrews, J.A.Y. (1983). Ambushes, shootouts, and knights of the round table: The language of corporate takeovers. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, & T.C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational Symbolism (pp. 145-166). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
20. Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature: A history of motliers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon.
21. Kiernan, V. (1999, December 7). How egalitarian societies rein in potential despots. Chronicle of Higher Education, p.A22.
22. Kimball, R. (1997, November 5). A syllabus for sickos. Wall Street Journal, p. A22.
23. Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24. Kolb, D. M. (1992). Women's work: Peacemaking in organizations. In D. Kolb & J. Bartunek (Eds.), Hidden conflict in organizations (pp. 63-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26. Lewis, M. (1989). Liar's poker. New York: Norton.
27. Mansfield, H. (1997, November 3). Why a woman can't be more like a man. Wall Street Journal, p. A22.
28. Marshall, J. (1989). Revisioning career concepts: A feminist invitation. In M. Arthur, D. Hall, & B. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 275-291). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Marshall, J. (2000). Revisting Simone de Beauvior: Recognizing feminist contributions to pluralism in organizational studies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9,166-172.
30. Martin, J. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos. Organization Science, 1,339-359.
31. Martin, J., Knopoff, K., & Beckman, C. (1998). An alternative to bureaucratic impersonality and emotional labor: Bounded emotionality at The Body Shop. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43,429-469.
32. Martin, P. Y., & Collinson, D. L. (1998). Gender and sexuality in organizations. In M. Ferrée, J. Lorber, & B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 285-310). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. McDonald, K. A. (1999, April 2). Support from women minimizes stress. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A24.
34. Meyerson, D., & Fletcher, J. (2000, January-February). A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review, pp. 127-136.
35. Moi, T. (1985). Sexual/textual politics: Feminist literary theory. London: Routledge.
36. Morris, B. (1999, May 10). Addicted to sex. Fortune, pp. 68-80.
37. Nicholson, N. (1998, July-August). How hardwired is human behavior. Harvard Business Review, pp. 135-147.
38. Nord, W. R., & Connell, A. F. (1993). From quicksand to crossroads: An agnostic perspective on conversation. Organization Science, 4,108.
39. Pereira, J. (1999, February 4). Sixty goofy-looking little figures spark toy craze. Wall Street Journal, pp. Bl, 4.
40. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
41. Pussey, A., Williams, J., & Goodall, J. (1997). The influence of dominance rank on the reproductive success of female chimpanzees. Science, 277,828-830.
42. Salter, F. K. (1995) Emotions in command: A naturalistic study of institutional dominance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Satel, S. (1997, July 11). NOW's time is past. Wall Street Journal, p. A14.
44. Schor, N., & Weed, E. (1994). The essential difference. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
45. Schräge, M. (1999, August 16). It's all in your brain: Why can't a woman be more like a man? Fortune, p. 184.
46. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47. Tiger, L. (1999). The decline of males. New York: Golden Books.
48. Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38,628-652.
49. Wiley, J. (2000, January 7). Non sequitur. Lubbock Avalanche Journal, p. B6.
50. Wrangham, R. W, & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
51. Zuckerman, G. (1999, November 28). Woman on a bond desk deals with slights and rises to the top. Wall Street Journal, pp. Al,10.
52. Ignored for "Good Reason" Beauvoir's Philosophy as a Revision of Social Identity Approaches MARIA B. CALAS LINDA SMIRCICH University of Massachusetts-Amherst
53. Alexander, A. (1997). The eclipse of gender: Simone de Beauvoir and the "difference" of translation. Philosophy Today, 41,112-122.
54. Antonopoulos, A. (1994). Simone de Beauvoir and the difference of translation. Bulletin of the Simone de Beauvoir Institute, U, 93-106.
55. Bair, D. (1989). Introduction. The second sex. New York: Vintage.
56. Bartky, S. L. (1975). Toward a phenomenology of feminist consciousness. Social Theory and Practice, 3,425-439.
57. Bergoffen, D. B. (1998). The philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir. New York: State University of New York Press.
58. Billig, M. (1996). Remembering the particular background of social identity theory. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.) Social groups and identities (pp. 336-357). Oxford, UK: ButterworthHeinemann.
59. Butler, J. (1992). Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy. New York: Routledge
60. Calas, M., & Smircich, L. (1992). Re-writing gender into organizational theorizing: Directions from feminist per-spectives. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organization (pp. 227-253). London: Sage.
61. Calas, M., & Smircich, L. (1996). Not ahead of her time: Reflections on Mary Parker Follett as prophet of management. Organization, 3,147-152.
62. Chodorow, N. (1978). Hie reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63. Condor, S. (1996). Social identity and time. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities (pp. 285-315). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
64. Beauvoir, S. de (1989). Tiie second sex. New York: Vintage.
65. Dietz, M. G. (1992, Autumn). Introduction: Debating Simone the Beauvoir. Signs, pp. 74-88.
66. Firestone, S. (1970). Tlie dialectic of sex. New York: Bantam.
67. Friedan, B.(1963). Hie feminine mystique. New York: Dell.
68. Fullbrook, K., & Fullbrook, E. (1998). The philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Gendered phénoménologies, erotic generosities. Hypathia, 23(3), 181-188.
69. Heller, S. (1998, September 4). Scholars seek to rank Simone de Beauvoir among leading 20th-century philosophers. Tlie Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A22.
70. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
71. Lobel, S. A., & St. Clair, L. (1992). Effects of family responsibilities, gender, and career identity salience on performance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 1057.
72. Lundgren-Gothlin, E. (1996). Sex and existence: Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
73. Pilardi, J.-A. (1993). The changing critical fortunes of Hie Second Sex. History and Theory, 32,51-93.
74. Reicher, S. (1996). Social identity and social change: Rethinking the context of social psychology. In W. P. Robin-son (Ed.), Social groups and identities (pp. 317-336). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
75. Robinson, W. P. (1996). Postscript. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities (pp. 359-362). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
76. Simons, M. A. (1983). The silencing of Simone de Beauvoir: Guess what is missing from The Second Sex. Women's Studies International Forum, 6,559-564.
77. Simons, M. A. (Ed.) (1995). Feminist interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir. University Park: Pennsyvania State University Press.
78. Skevington, S., & Baker, D. (1989). Introduction. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 1-14). London: Sage.
79. Soady, V., & Wisharr, H. (1999, April). 50th anniversary of The Second Sex celebrated, off our backs, 29(4), 1.
80. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
81. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Tlie social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
82. Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83. Turner, J. C. (1996). Henri Tajfel: An introduction. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 1-23). Oxford, UK: ButterworthHeinemann.
84. Vintges, K. (1996). Philosophy as passion: The thinking of Simone de Beauvoir. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.