Efficient complexation of N-acetyl amino acid carboxylates in water by an artificial receptor: Unexpected cooperativity in the binding of glutamate but not aspartate

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 30, 2005, Pages 10486-10487

  Schmuck, Carsten ^a   Geiger, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; AMINO ACID DERIVATIVE; ASPARTIC ACID; CARBOXYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; GLUTAMIC ACID; RECEPTOR; WATER;

AMINATION; ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; DEPROTECTION REACTION; HYDROGEN BOND; ION EXCHANGE; IONIC STRENGTH; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR STABILITY; REDUCTION; STEREOSPECIFICITY; SYNTHESIS;

ASPARTIC ACID; CATIONS; GLUTAMATES; KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; RECEPTORS, AMINO ACID; WATER;

EID: 23044458518     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja052699k     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. For selected examples on the complexation of amino acids in aqueous solvents, see: (a) Escuder, B.; Rowan, A. E.; Feiters, M. C.; Nolte, R. J. M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 291-300.
2. (b) Hernández, J. V.; Muñiz, F. M.; Oliva, A. I.; Simón, L.; Pérez, E.; Morán, J. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6983-6985.
3. (c) Arena, G.; Contino, A.; Gulino, F. G.; Magrì, A.; Sansone, F.; Sciotto, D.; Ungaro, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 40, 1597-1600.
4. (d) Higashi, N.; Koga, T.; Niwa, M. ChemBioChem 2002, 3, 448-454.
5. (e) Grawe, T.; Schrader, T.; Finocchiaro, P.; Consiglio, G.; Failla, S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1597-1600.
6. (f) Ait-Haddou, H.; Wiskur, S. L.; Lynch, V. M.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11296-11297.
7. (g) Mizutani, T.; Wada, K.; Kitagawa, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11425-11431.
8. Severin, K.; Bergs, R.; Beck, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1634-1654.
9. (a) Schmuck, C.; Graupner, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 40, 1295-1298.
10. (b) Schmuck, C.; Bickert, V. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4579-4581.
11. (c) Schmuck, C. Chem.-Eur. J. 2000, 6, 709-718.
12. (d) Schmuck, C. Chem. Commun. 1999, 843-844.
13. (e) For a review, see: Schmuck, C.; Geiger, L. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 1485-1502.
14. (a) Schug, K. A.; Lindner, W. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 67-113.
15. (b) Best, M. D.; Tobey, S. L.; Anslyn, E. V. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 3-15.
16. (c) Gale, P. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 191-221.
17. (d) Fitzmaurice, R. J.; Kyne, G. M.; Douheret, D.; Kilburn, J. D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 841-864.
18. (a) Connors, K. A. Binding Constants; Wiley: New York, 1987.
19. (b) Fielding, L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6151-6170.
20. 3a
21. Macromodel V8.0, Amber* force field, GB/SA water solvation, MC conformational search with 100.000 step and subsequent MD run at 300 K for 100 ps. Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G. J.; Guida, W. C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.; Still, W. C. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440-467.
22. The weaker binding compared to that of alanine is probably due to the more extensive solvation of dianions in water: Minofar, B.; Mucha, M.; Jungwirth, P.; Yang, X.; Fu, Y. J.; Wang, X.-B.; Wang, L.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11698-11691.
23. For reviews on cooperativity, see: (a) Williams, D. H.; Stephens, E.; O'Brien, D. P.; Zhou, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6596-6616.
24. (b) Hunter, C. A.; Tomas, S. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 1023-1032.
25. (c) Ercolani, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16097-16103.
26. (d) Tobey, S. L.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10963-10970.
27. Selected examples of supramolecular systems exhibiting cooperativity: (a) Kawai, H.; Katoono, R.; Nishimura, K.; Matsuda, S.; Fujiwara, K.; Tsuji, T.; Suzuki, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5034-5036.
28. (b) Mazika, M.; Sicking, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3117-3121.
29. (c) Raker, J.; Glass, T. E. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6505-6512.
30. Wiskur, S. L.; Ait-Haddou, H.; Lavinge, J. J.; Anslyn, E. V. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 963-972.